Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sean, you may not be knowingly defending the rights of the criminal in your eyes, you may well think you are actually standing up for democracy and what you believe to be right in a democracy - but you fail to accept that by doing so you are immediately giving the original criminal back the emphasis to stand up on their high horse and view society with contempt for letting them get away with it - which based on my understanding and experience of the courts is exactly what will happen. I agree with James, the middle classes do take some sort of pride in standing up for rule of law (quite rightly), but nowadays they go a step too far by completely ignoring the causes of the incident in the first place, which was a shop lifter entering a shop and stealing. I cannot continue this conversation because it makes me angry, do-gooders never see things from another point of view hence why this country is ruled by a bunch of middle class liberals who do not take basic reasoning into account.


Louisa.

In Russia and I expect in other countries too, the shop staff (including the security staff) have any losses from shoplifting taken from their wages - this installs in them a good reason for watching out for shoplifters and being rather heavy-handed if apprehending them. I am sure that this policy does not apply to Somerfield.

In a local 'Spar', when I was about ten years old, the shopkeeper rapped the back of my hand with a tube of Smarties (smartly). I was trying to steal a Mars Bar at the time. I never tried to steal anything from that shop again.


Who knows, if I'd received a brace of slaps and perhaps a cracked rib or two instead of being lightly admonished with a tube of sweets, I might not have gone on to pinch Rolos from the other newsagent and handfuls of pick n mix from Woolies? Or they could have held me down and stabbed me in the eye, which would certainly have put me off stealing sweets for life, I assure you.


Nobody knows if the bloke was even shoplifting.

Nobody knows if the bloke was shoplifting and threw a punch before alleged 'aaht of ordaa' restraint by staff.


As usual, nobody knows anything. But it's comforting to see that the usual pointlessly polarised battlelines have already been drawn.

It sounds that the staff stepped out of line and it would be interesting to hear the other side of the story. There are plenty of people who believe criminals are able to use the system to their advantage.


Without hopefully sounding like a facist, doesn't it come down to people not caring for authority, whether it's staff in a shop or staff at hospitals or the police. I absolutely believe the rule of law, but if it leaves everybody unable to deal with somebody committing a crime, what do you do? Just to spend your time seething at people appearing to 'get away with it'.


A while ago, I watched the police take a chap who was causing unrest at a tube station and bundled him away. There were people taking photos, as they wanted to believe that they were watching police brutality, rather than them just doing their job.


Perhaps, he said something about their Mums.

elipie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My mum always told me that two wrongs don't make a

> right. My brother would steal my toys, I'd hit

> him, he'd go crying to Mum and we'd both get a

> telling-off.

...and if you did hurt him,how many times did this re-occur?..Even if it did in your example,my long experience tells me that people are infinitely more likely to continue with something if they get away with it.Indeed they push the boundaries even more.A thief will steal,say ?25, then ?50 and will "up the ante" if there is little or no comeback....

seamusmac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How many of the good people posting here can say

> that they have never shoplifted, even a sweetie as

> a kid. Nicked the apples from an orchard or grazed

> on grapes in the supermarket.I am not condoning

> crime but Snorky makes a good point and some

> people are just a little too quick to point the

> finger.


I was just about to say that myself. I for one will hold my hands up and admit to a bit of pilfering in the past, certainly don't think I deserve a good kicking for it and it hasn't led to a descent into a life of crime either.

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...and if you did hurt him,how many times did this

> re-occur?..Even if it did in your example,my long

> experience tells me that people are infinitely

> more likely to continue with something if they get

> away with it.Indeed they push the boundaries even

> more.A thief will steal,say ?25, then ?50 and will

> "up the ante" if there is little or no

> comeback....


The point I was making, which someone else made earlier, is that it wasn't up to me to dole out the punishment and in doing so, I got myself into trouble as well.


And to answer your question, it made no difference at all whether I retaliated with brother or not - he still nicked my toys!

Absolutely! If I'm ever burgled and apprehend the culprits,I shall ask them if they wouldn't mind awfully waiting for the local constabulory to arrive,while naturally apologising for any inconvenience caused all round.I shall then hand them over and wave them off with a cheery smile.Violence never solved anything.I'm sure a consoling arm round the shoulder will do the trick in this potentially awkward situation.

I think that this argument has become terribly predictable and obviously polarised. I note that working class people know what scum are and they know how devious they can be. I never stole as a child and my circumstances were far from perfect I can assure you, but I had a sense of pride installed from an early age that you have to work bloody hard for whatever you get, especially in a country so fixated with keeping the class system going, never allowing the lower classes to progress however hard they work, never quite being allowed into 'the club', unless you happen to be born into it of course. With the greatest deal of respect, I do appreciate what some people on here are saying about the rule of law and how violence breeds violence, but in my opinion this 'underclass' of people who have developed out of the welfare nanny state society we have been living in post 1945 have been given a free ride by the very people who want to install a sense of democracy and social cohesion in our 21st century society. The middle classes do not recognise the damage that they have done to our society as a whole through the legal system and cultural liberalism which has penetrated every aspect life.


Louisa.

Tony.London Suburbs - if you look out the window and find someone who looks like Mike Tyson's bigger brother trying to break into you car. What do you do first? a) punch him in the mouth or b) kick him in the goolies??


Summary justice only 'works' (and I use the term lightly) when you are a lot bigger and/or outnumber the person in question, really, doesn't it? When that doesn't apply, the bravado ain't so strong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...