Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry lemerson, I don't think your objection is founded. If the problem can be solved by building as little new infrastructure as possible, that saves public money and minimises the impact to the environment of the new construction.


The soft defences will co-exist alongside the park. From what I can see on the council website it looks like none of the existing park facilities will be lost - they will only be temporarily out of order if this 1 in 75 year event (which sounds like a fairly extreme case to me) does happen. So, it's statistically likely that this will happen only once every 75 years - but it could even be less often than that.


As for Tellytubbies, the images published by the council don't look like anything of the sort - these are gentle and quite small slopes, not large hills. The flood meadows are new areas of planting within existing parkland which will add visual interest and help biodiversity, while again taking away none of the park facilities.


You suggest that the floodwaters should be diverted to open fields elsewhere in the area. Obviously I don't know the exact details but it's probably safe to assume that if this is even technically possible it will be significantly more costly, complex and disruptive to build, and the new construction will have a greater impact on the environment. It's just not worth all of that to avoid closing the park for what is statistically likely to be a matter of days in a 75 year period.



lemerson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jomou Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > These proposals sound perfectly sensible, not

> to

> > mention being much more environmentally

> friendly,

> >

>

> > In fact, the proposals do contain new drainage

> in

> > the form of flood meadows etc which hold more

> > water than a flat lawn -

>

> Hang on - so the plans include losing a large

> grass area where local people play, eat picnics,

> and relax all year round, over many years, and

> replace that permanently with a "flood meadow"

> scheme for the 1 in 75 year storm?! Sorry it

> doesn't add up. Nor do I want the park turned into

> Telly Tubby Land with these eyesores built. 'Soft

> drainage' sounds like a friendly phrase by

> engineers charged with solving a problem with no

> money. Surely clever engineers can divert the

> waters to the other side of the South Circular -

> the Dutch manage it?!

"I think that's unfair, lemerson made a reasonable request in a polite manner."


I read it differently - instead of responding to the substance of the post (which contradicted his/her assertions about lack of consultation) lemerson immediately responded in a way that, albeit politely, sought to undermine the credibility of the information via the implication that the poster (a) had an interest and (b) could therefore not be trusted to report accurately. Classic paranoid/obsessive/comspiracy theorist stuff, and consistent with the other posts.


It is notable that all the other posts on the topic come across as pretty rational and considered, especially by comparison.


FWIW, I'm in favour of the proposal for all the reasons set out sensibly above.

lemerson Wrote:

...... Surely clever engineers can divert the

> waters to the other side of the South Circular -

> the Dutch manage it?!



Are you referring to the Dutch polder system? This is for reclamation of land from the sea not emergency flood relief. In any event, they use banks (dykes) and open channels. I can't really see that working across the South Circular. The soft drainage proposed is very clever, sustainable, and how many people picnic in the middle of winter (when the flooding may prevent use of the park)?

Hi all


I should have made it clear in my earlier post that I am a longstanding Dulwich resident, but not a councillor, contractor nor Southwark employee, nor am I a candidate in the forthcoming local elections, and my interest in the flood management is apolitical. I am active in local residents' issues and amenity societies such as the Dulwich Society. In this case, I have attended Southwark's meetings and workshops on the proposed flood measures over the past few months and contributed my thoughts on the proposals particularly in the Village area. I am not a member of the Friends of Park groups but they have also been very active in attending workshops. There is a Consultation Summary Report document on the planning application document list which details all the meetings and groups involved, and issues raised during the workshops.


This is a big proposal affecting three large green spaces in the centre of Dulwich and it is important that everyone contributes so I encourage everyone to respond to the planning applications.


The consultation closing date has moved out to 5th February so there is plenty of time to review the documents. If I hear of any updates or meetings about the proposals I will post them on here.


Kind regards

All

Further to last post, I checked the Southwark web site again and the closing dates for the flood planning applications are:

Dulwich Park - 12th Feb 2014

Belair Park - 10th Feb 2014

Southwark Community Sports Trust (Dulwich Sports Ground in Turney Road) - 5th Feb 2014

Hi all,


I am on the Dulwich Park Friends committee. I or my colleagues have attended all of the meetings. The plans have gone through many iterations. One of the aims of the technical team has been to use gravity where possible, which in large part dictates where the holding areas need to be.


I know the technical team have answered individual enquiries, so if you have questions do ask them. John Kissi at Southwark is leading, with external consultants on board. And of course you can respond in the formal planning process.


Why not join the Friends and get our regular monthly email newsletter that would have alerted you to the public meetings and the chance to input? You can download an application form here (sorry, no online applications yet): http://www.dulwichparkfriends.org.uk/index.php/friends-info/join-us

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...