Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help, please?!


I'm looking for a night nurse who can help get my 12 week old baby girl to take a bottle.


She was a great sleeper and feeder until 3 weeks ago. She took a bottle at 2 weeks but we were advised to stop util breastfeeding was established at 4-5 weeks. What a mistake! Now she won't take it at all. Her sleep pattern has regressed so much so that last night she woke up every hour after 2am until I gave up at 6.45. My milk supply is now pitiful and she's not getting enough food, so the cycle is getting worse. For the last two days she has been refusing day time breastfeeds and I'm at the end of my tether...


Any suggestions very gratefully received.


H

Have you tried all different kinds of bottles? When I was transitioning my son from breast to bottle we had to try a few - Madela (he did like these), Avent anti colic (hated these) and then we settled on doctor brown which are excellent. Sometimes I think the teat can make a big difference. I know it is hard especially with not sleeping (my son has only just started selling through at 2) but persistence is key. If you are worried though she isn't getting enough can you call your health visitor and get them to pop around to see if they can help or know the details of someone who can? X

Thanks Strawbs.


Yes, we've tried 4 bottle teats now. The nuk is showing the most promise so I'll stick with that and a gently gently approach for a few days.


Tried my mum and my partner feeding. I've had the best success so far though, annoyingly! She hasn't taken a proper feed at all today. Argh!


I feel I meed someone to help break the 'making up for it at night' cycle!


x

Huge sympathies! I'm afraid I don't know any night nannies, and you have probably already thought of this, but it is worth trying different types of formula too. My daughter really hated the expensive Hipp Organic I wanted her to have when I was moving her on to bottle feeding, but guzzled down a full bottle of lowly Cow & Gate, for example.

I know this not quite what you asked but increased number of feeds doesn't have to mean a problem with supply rather this age is prime time for a growth spurt with increased night feeds to dial up more milk...

Oh and I second Nuk bottles with the brown teats as the only ones that worked for my bottle refusers!

Good luck!

I used a Night Nanny (www.nightnannies.com) to help with my daughters sleep at 4 months and to try and get her onto the bottle. The nanny we got was brilliant and she really helped improve my confidence and we sorted the sleep in a few days. However my daughter held out on the bottle and the nanny gave up in the end, saying she was just strong willed and would only do it when she was ready.


I would say that it's worth calling them to talk to them - I found them quite willing to talk before committing to coming out / payment. They will probably help you to get things back on some kind of track - but it probably will still be a bit of playing with different bottles and pitting your will against your little girl's and won't be a magic solution. But then, your daughter may be more compliant and they'll be able to do more. Worth calling for a chat. They'll make you feel better even if they don't solve your problem 100%.

My 5 month old wasn't keen on taking a bottle but my husband used a NUK teat on the NUK cup, without handles, as the shorter length made it easier to feed him in a position close to breastfeeding. He now takes the NUK teat with the cup and likes it facing outwards in the sling holding the handles himself. So may be worth experimenting with positions as well as bottles.


Also an obvious one for supply which I'm sure you're already doing but make sure you're eating and drinking enough. I often forget to drink enough water, which can effect things. I'm also ravenous, far more so than when pregnant.


Good luck with it all!! I know what hell it is when you're not getting any sleep so hope things get better soon.

Thank you so much everyone.


I called nightnannies and managed to get a lady to come the next day who used the NUK bottles and managed to train Cora within a couple of hours. It has changed my life. Cora is now putting on weight before my eyes and we are all sleeping better. It was sxpensive, but well worth every penny.


Feeling the forum love big time.


xx

Really pleased they were able to help. Can I ask how expensive is expensive?! I get the impression from the website you're talking around ?200 but is that what you actually end up paying (ie not loads more for various fees etc?) Also, I'm thinking of enlisting the help of a night nanny to get my 8mo to sleep through, is that realistic? Be great to hear anyone's experiences. Thanks in advance.

Mrs N - so glad to hear that it worked so well. Life is so much easier with sleep and a happy baby!


Jenc - it was a few years ago we did it but it cost around ?100 a night and we paid for 2 nights but got quite a bit of extra support via the phone included. That may have been down to the individual nanny wanting to help. But we felt it was the best money we spent over all the baby related expenses we'd incurred - it helped with the problem and gave us a lot more confidence in our skills.

For sleep training, my NCT group had a seminar with Nicola Watson at Child Sleep Solutions. Our little ones were all around 2-3 months, so a lot of it was future theory but we got practical information and I certainly found it really useful over the last year. I know another person who used her for sleep training (I can't remember if over the phone or actually staying overnight) and said it was an immense help and included continuing phone support. Not as expensive as nightnannies, but definitely expensive, of course.


As stanswithfist says, if you can generally get a decent nights sleep on a regular basis and learn how to deal with any changing patterns, then it definitely pays for itself!

We used night nannies when my oldest son was 11m old, and I was going totally out of my mind with tiredness. Yes, expensive, but he has slept all night ever since (now nearly 5!). We had a great nanny who stayed over for two nights, all sorted within a week, and naps gradually over the next month. Basically it totally changed my life!
That is what I like to hear Snowboarder! Did the nanny "sort" your son out as it were, or did she get you involved through the night and explain what to do? I guess I don't mind paying if I know it's going to have the desired effect and I'll be able to carry it through after the nanny's gone.

Jenc - she involved me throughout. After an initial chat on the phone and at our house, she basically introduced herself to my little boy when she arrived at 6pm, sat and chatted while he had his bath and milk, and just told me what she thought we should do. He cried a bit when I put him to bed (previously bf him to sleep) but not too much, and she just reassured me that it was ok, he was fine, just a bit cross and confused. He then went to sleep, and woke at about 11pm, cried - again she just told me what she thought would work - go in, reassure, leave and wait.....and again at 5am. It was hard because leaving a baby to cry was something I swore I would never do, but actually he never got too upset, and there was about a max of 1 hr crying in total. We then flew solo the following night and he only woke once, and then she stayed the third night and he didn't wake at all. Naps took a bit longer and she actually came back a couple of days later in the middle of the day to help, and I cracked it with her advice (via text/pcall) over the following month. I was absolutely determined to follow through with the advice or it would have felt like a real waste of money, so I became totally fixated on nap times for a while!! I kind of felt afterwards a bit pathetic for needing someone to help me with this but I don't think I could have let him cry on my own....


So anyway - a success story. And this was now 3 years ago so things might have changed....

Oh - the other thing I was going to mention was that this was with my first baby and when I had my younger son I was determined that I was not going to ever let things get that bad - and much of what I did second time round stemmed from the night nanny experience - so with my youngest from about 12 weeks I tried to gently encourage him to go to sleep lying in his crib, with me there....and actually by 8m he was great at sleeping. So we never had any crying really with him. So all good and when I hear about some toddlers and even school aged children having sleep issues I think def worth the cash!
Haha, this is my third so you'd think I'd know what I'm doing by now! The other two are great sleepers and by 8m (age of number 3 now) were settling themselves to sleep etc. Not sure where I've gone wrong with this one, maybe he's just more highly strung... Or maybe I'm just more tired so take the easy option!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...