Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fabfor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just for the record, not one but 10+ scientific

> studies that prove consciousness can alter our

> material world:

>

> http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/03/08/10-

> scientific-studies-that-prove-consciousness-can-al

> ter-our-physical-material-world/

>

> I find the first one particularly shocking.


Awesome yes, intriguing yes, shocking ... not really.


Observation does not mean a person looking at something. You can take the human or the cat out of the experiment and you'd still get the same. You can get an education in physics and mathematics and help understand the reality or take a more comforting short cut and just make sh*t up. The latter is the fascinating world of the pseudoscience which includes the ghost hunters, the homeopaths of Lordship Lane and the chichi reiki quacks of east dulwich.

fabfor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @root. The vitriol I'll leave with you but I'll

> take awesome every time. I thank you for that.


Not vitriol ... pity and disdain maybe ... after years of dealing with stupid I don't have it in me to suffer fools gladly

Anyhow, on the more important subject of whether there is more to this world than meets the eye, examples 1 and 3 in the link above demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that "mind over matter" is scientific fact.


As pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: ?The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual.? (R.C. Henry, ?The Mental Universe? ; Nature 436:29,2005) (source)

The problem is as well as the human mind perhaps being able to alter reality - it can also perhaps alter perception of reality - so how can you ever know.


Then again nobody knows - unfortunately never seen anything even though I look and my dead mother was a spiritualist. Maybe ghosts avoid me.

  • 1 year later...
I think one of the problem with East Duwich and surrounding areas is that there's simply too much crazy around. From homeopathy, to reiki, to all kinds of chi chi and a above all too many god botherers. Get over it, there's no evidence of mind over matter (yes there are still some things we have to explain but just because we don't fully understand some mechanism doesn't mean we can draw any conclusion that we fancy), there's no evidence that water has memory, and above all there is no evidence that there is some god (or many) or that he's the one you choose to believe in. And yes, there is no evidence or reasons to believe that our departed are in a better place, watching over us, or some other rubbish. Get over it, your beloved dead ones are just dead. Gone. Ceased to exist. Forgotten in a few years' time, and one day, before you even know it you all will face that same fate, some more horribly than others. Have a good weekend.
While you are happy root to disbelieve some people's notions of various things, you can't actually prove anything can you? Oh it's just because we don't understand everything yet. Really? YOU have no chance of understanding everything anytime soon with an attitude full of so many preconceived ideas. They say ignorance is bliss. You must be very happy indeed.

The catch is that I don't have to prove anything because I'm not making any claims.


You want to believe homeopathy has memory when there is no solid argument in favour and no good quality evidence and reproducible results? Actually on the contrary it's been discredited over and over again. You can still believe in it, but don't expect more sensible people to consider you anything more than plain bonkers.


Or are you saying that I don't beliueve god or any other some other east dulwich ghost because I have preconceived ideas?

Unfortunately beloved do get forgotten because we all die do you have to be realistic - how can you be beloved of you great great great grandfather when your parents never knew him ?!


However true the "you're just dead" bit is, there's probably less harsh ways that could be said !

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately beloved do get forgotten because we

> all die do you have to be realistic - how can you

> be beloved of you great great great grandfather

> when your parents never knew him ?!

>

> However true the "you're just dead" bit is,

> there's probably less harsh ways that could be

> said !


How 'bout Victor Landa - "In our tradition, people die three deaths. The first death is when our bodies cease to function; when our hearts no longer beat of their own accord, when our gaze no longer has depth or weight, when the space we occupy slowly loses its meaning.


The second death comes when the body is lowered into the ground, returned to mother earth, out of sight.


The third death, the most definitive death, is when there is no one left alive to remember us."

You made loads of claims root which mostly were that people who believe in certain things are basically nuts. Explain for example how you know that those whose bodies have died are dead? They may well be if you think a human if simply a body and all its parts. But can you prove it, as you are certainly claiming all elements of a dead person are gone forever?


Your ideas are as small minded as those who you choose to ridicule for the same reason, as you can't prove a thing. I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm saying you can't prove it.

That pretty much sums it up. (Maxxi's post)


We are remembered by what we leave behind, so great musicians, artists, scientists, discoverers are immortalised by their work. But if like the vast majority of people, you leave no significant mark on the world, then eventually you'll be forgotten. We're all just insignificant specs really.

Is it important to be remembered? I don't think so as you're gone. Though it was quite interesting on leaving here for a while, to read my own 'obituary' in a thread even though I wasn't dead. We are insignificant in the greater scheme of things, but while you have a life it is anything but insignificant to you and others close to you.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You made loads of claims root which mostly were

> that people who believe in certain things are

> basically nuts. Explain for example how you know


well, deluded at best


> that those whose bodies have died are dead? They

> may well be if you think a human if simply a body

> and all its parts. But can you prove it, as you

> are certainly claiming all elements of a dead

> person are gone forever?


I am saying there is no evidence that points to anything beyond so it's not reasonable to live with the expectation or belief that there is.


>

> Your ideas are as small minded as those who you

> choose to ridicule for the same reason, as you

> can't prove a thing. I'm not saying you are wrong,

> I'm saying you can't prove it.


It doesn't make much sense trying to disprove something there is no reason to suspect in the first place.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it important to be remembered?



No, as you say, you won't know whether you are or not.


The point is simply that being remembered is probably the only way you'll "live on" in some sort of way.

root, just because there isn't any evidence doesn't mean something might not be true. It may not be but you can't prove any of what you have disputed so far. You have an opinion. you're welcome to it and it's your right. But if I tell you that I have come back from the dead, what would you say?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> root, just because there isn't any evidence

> doesn't mean something might not be true. It may


I just want to see the evidence, if there is no evidence and reason behind a claim then it's 'cute' at best, hilarious (like ghosts), or cringeworthy (like god) at worst.


> not be but you can't prove any of what you have

> disputed so far. You have an opinion. you're

> welcome to it and it's your right. But if I tell

> you that I have come back from the dead, what

> would you say?


Show me the evidence, otherwise I can recommend you to mental health professionals who can help with your psychosis.

Ermm root do you mind not rehashing one of my favourite threads to ridicule and demoralise those who believe in it, and indeed those who may well be i. The middle of the grieving process at present. It's crass and achieves sweet FA in the grand scheme of things. Trolling at its worst.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ermm root do you mind not rehashing one of my

> favourite threads to ridicule and demoralise those

> who believe in it, and indeed those who may well

> be i. The middle of the grieving process at

> present. It's crass and achieves sweet FA in the

> grand scheme of things. Trolling at its worst.

>

> Louisa.



Exactly. Whether you agree with something or not, it's HOW you say things.


If you disagree, show a bit of empathy and humanity and THINK...............


About how your post might affect others.

root Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > root, just because there isn't any evidence

> > doesn't mean something might not be true. It

> may

>

> I just want to see the evidence, if there is no

> evidence and reason behind a claim then it's

> 'cute' at best, hilarious (like ghosts), or

> cringeworthy (like god) at worst.


I'm not saying I have evidence, but neither do you. If you haven't experienced something it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just doesn't exist for you.

>

> > not be but you can't prove any of what you have

> > disputed so far. You have an opinion. you're

> > welcome to it and it's your right. But if I

> tell

> > you that I have come back from the dead, what

> > would you say?

>

> Show me the evidence, otherwise I can recommend

> you to mental health professionals who can help

> with your psychosis.


Hang on, show you the evidence of what? I don't have any evidence for you but neither have you evidence to say people/souls do not exist after death.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...