Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I phoned the same friend once and had a rather

> strange conversation as she had called me at the

> same time and our calls met in the middle, with

> neither phone actually ringing.

>

> Not sure I see this stuff as necessarily

> spiritual, though. Physicists can prove that

> everything is composed of energy, that everything

> that has lived has an energy field, and apparently

> that time is non-linear outside our day-to-day

> experience (don't ask me for references as I'm not

> that bothered) so it seems reasonable that in some

> circumstances some people might unwittingly tap

> into this somehow.

>

> Science isn't always black and white: when you

> hold hands with someone, you know which is your

> hand and which is theirs, but at the simplest

> molecular level you can't see where one person

> stops and the other begins. I find that rather

> beautiful.



What utter rubbish.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Never mind what he got out of it, what did you?

>

> Hadn't done it before and not since? If it was

> genuinely powerful or, god forbid, useful, why not

> pursue this fantastic avenue


Can't say I got anything much out of it at the time, just find it interesting to try things out for myself sometimes. Hadn't thought about it for years till I saw this thread.


Retelling it here has allowed me the amusement of witnessing some enjoyably ego-driven chest-beating though. Does that count?

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was involved in a group psychometry exercise

> once, years ago - not something I've done before

> or since. The leader gave everyone a photo related

> to his personal life in an envelope and you had to

> blurt out the first images that came into your

> head. I saw a woman with dark hair, a curve in a

> wide, brown river with a muddy shoreline and the

> sun on the water, then a sort of industrial

> interior with small metal things going through the

> air on a belt. They were just flashes but clear,

> so I described them, feeling like a total idiot.

> When I opened it, the picture was of his mother,

> who was originally from Sheffield, who lost

> another son when he drowned in the river.

>

> Maybe the guy was a charlatan but I can't see what

> he got out of it if so.


Interesting.

Many years ago, six of us went to the Spiritualist Association of GB HQ to 'check it out' and were very surprised by a very accurate psychometry reading, using a wristwatch belonging to a member of our party. He was a medical student and had gone in a confirmed cynic but came a confused cynic!

He said that she had revealed (worldly) things that even his brother (also an attendee) didn't know. He was clearly in shock and we all had to accept that something 'weird' had happened.

I remain convinced that psychometry is really telepathy (with the aid of an object).

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What does that even mean Aquarius ?

>

> I read your post. You claimed your cat was put to

> sleep, but like Stephen kings per semetary it came

> back?

>

> And I'm defensive aind impatient?



I don't know if she came back, I just felt her and it had never happened to me before.


All I'm saying is don't be so disbelieving just because you haven't experienced it yet. Doesn't mean you never will.


Keep an open mind as you may one day be proved wrong, as I was, because until it happened to me, I didn't believe it either.

MagMag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Co-incidence or synchronicity? Accident or

> connectivity? Watch out Burbage..... we might be

> quantum entangled!!!


It's possible. Although it would usually require a bicycle, second-hand or otherwise, to be common to both our lives, the shocking state of modern enamelling, and the general disregard of bicycle-training, suggests parking-stands and lampposts may also be powerful vectors for the atomic mingling.


But as I can't be sure (unless Louisa can find the time to consult the late Mr O'Brien on our behalf), I'm tempted to put it down to the fact that we might have happened to read books by the same author. And that's neither synchronicity nor coincidence. That's publishing.

  • 2 weeks later...

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Santa. Not real

> Yeti. Not real

> UFO. Not real

> Ghosts. Not real



Santa. Not real

Yeti. Not real

UFO. PROBABLY Not real in terms of reported sightings, but surely possible given how tiny we are in the universe...

Ghosts. PROBABLY Not real



I bet you can't wait to ruin Christmas for your kids and put them right! ;-)

of course once we identify a flying object, it's no longer a UFO


But I take your point - and I would be well up for ghosts being real


But being realistic and weighing up the balance of probability - just sifting through all the reported sightings (particularly of UFOs) there seems to be a pattern of dimmness/gullibility. And given how much time/money as been spent on trying to find ANYTHING to do with them, the chances of them existing are miniscule. I'm happy to be proved wrong but no point telling lot's of people they are REAL either (you haven't done that but some people will insist!)


As for my kids.. well, there's the rub. I'm loving playing along with the whole Santa/Easter thing but if I have to compare grown ups posting on a public forum with them, I know who comes off worst ;-)

Ha :)


Although strictly speaking UFO. Not real still stands


just


No such thing as life elsewhere = massively unlikely.


That said, we're in a pretty isolated bit of space, why anyone would use the enormous energies/thousands of years involved in supralight/sublight travel to get here and potter about concerning themselves with our sensibilities of truthes we may or may not be able to cope with, whilst obssessing with cow/field vandalism and probing anuses, is anyone's guess.

on the subject of Santa and "finding out" I remember being traumatised by the revelation. I don't think my parents told me, it was just the steady accretion of facts


Can't remember how old I was - pretty young but I suspect kids these days will all have found out via the internet before they hit 4

"dimmness/gullibility" is rather harsh.

"Heart over head" is how I'd put it.


Just for a while I truly believed that stevenage could get a result over everton. Turned out the evidence was lacking, but this is the sort of situation when you can prove the negative that there's no such thing as a stevenage cup defeat to everton.


As the alleys for ghost enthusiasts to use scientific techniques to prove their existence diminish, so the noises about how science doesnt understand and they're only perceptible to those willing to believe (and by some non physical facet that our occular/tactile/aural senses somehow have over and above other ways of recording photons and pressure changes) accrete.

They're looking for musicians. They're thousands of years ahead of us in most things, but for some reason they've not moved past plain chant, and they're desperate to rock out.


They picked up Ziggy Stardust on SJ's frequency, and thought he was real.

"The evidence for your Stevenage hope wasn't lacking - it just showed an extremely small chance of it happening"


It's all about how you *want* to interpret things.


The evidence of Stevenage getting a result in the 4th round of the FA Cup is about 50% so heart was at least no well placed than a contrary position. Of course sitting bottom with a terrible run of form, against Martinez's effective side suggested otherwise, but it was at least plausible.


But you make a valid point about heart over head, given the balance of possibilities I chose to believe a contrary position. Had we never reached the 4th round I would still have gone for it because that's what I wanted to believe.......


I'm sure there's a parabolic point to be made in there somewhere if someone can just spot the subtle clues.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guys there is no argument, we are just human

> beings and we only know what we know and can prove

> to date. I'm sure there is a lot more beyond our

> understanding, even the ability to which our

> understanding can stretch. So all the nay sayers

> arrogantly using logic to dismiss another's belief

> can carry on doing so. It bothers me not. I still

> believe whether you do or not.


Of course there's only so much we know.


Which is why we take a step back and ask ourselves, "what are we trying to explain?", or "how does this work?" or "how do I solve this problem?".


Then we scrach our heads, go through the knowledge we have accumulated to date and make educated guesses here and there and come up with a hypothesis. Then we build models and make predictions and device experiments to test those hypothesis. We test, observe and collect data, refine our methods and analyse all that data we've collected. If our results tally with our hypothesis we throw a party and if not we scratch our heads, see what what we have learnt, revise our hypothesis and start all over.


What we don't do is start with an absolute truth and holding onto it when it flies straight into the face of observation and reason. Since I moved to ED I have lost count of how many times I have been stopped by assorted god bothereres all of whom wanted to share their version of absolute truth with me. About how I am a sinner but someone dies for the sins I had yet to commit a couple of millenia ago because he loved me. Others wanted me to go to some metaphisical hospital where they cure illnesses science cannot explain. Others even left pamphlets in my mail saying how evolution and cosmology are just a hoax and the world is just 10000 years old.

Who revived this thread!?


Or has it, indeed, been revived?


Perhaps this is no longer a live thread but the shadow of a thread that 'passed over'. A thread essence that lives on in our collective consciousness and all those posting on it are giving it form and/or suffering (and contributing to) an emotionally generated mass hallucination.


Or perhaps they're asleep at their keyboards and it's all automatic writing.


Am I really posting this - or have I been ghost written?


wooooooo...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...