Jump to content

Recommended Posts

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fabfor Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Re. "clear evidence for telepathy", after the

> dialogues I've had with forum members, I take that

> back.

> > I would now say "some evidence for telepathy".

>

> Ok, fair enough - which of Sheldrake's studies (or

> any others for that matter) do you think

> demonstrate "some evidence for

> telepathy" ?

>

> I'm only asking because the Sheldrake studies you

> linked to could be ripped apart by schoolchildren

> - literally 15/16yr olds studying GCSE psychology

> would take issue with his methodology.

>

> As said earlier, he seems to have no idea how to

> actually test for telepathy (or presumably any

> other parapsychological phenomena). It's

> impossible to tell if he is just observing known

> psychological effects (such as the effects of

> demand characteristics/participant bias) because

> his approach is so flawed.

>

> He should probably take some time to properly

> eliminate psychological effects before attributing

> his results as parapsychological 'evidence' for

> telepathy.


What can I say, other than I note your opinion?

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having recently been visited by a local psychic

> due to some unexplained activity in my home, I

> wondered of anyone else had seen or heard of any

> local ghostly activities? I found a few articles

> online regarding tales of spiritual activity, and

> this one in particular caught my eye regarding the

> old Kings Arms pub which was destroyed during the

> blitz.

>

> http://www.mysteriousbritain.co.uk/england/greater

> -london/hauntings/the-kings-arms-peckham-rye.html

>

> Louisa.


Firstly, I'd like to thank you, Louisa, for starting this lively! thread. It's actually helped me to resolve a dilemma I've been living with for more than 18 years.


Your invitation was for tales of the paranormal - how many of those have we had?


The scarcity is not surprising when anyone who dares to give any credibility to the paranormal here is almost guaranteed to be attacked with surprising religious fervour.


The thread has effectively become an intellectual battleground rather than a place for people to sympathetically relate what they've heard or experienced.


I'm as guilty as anyone for hijacking the thread even though I'd really love to hear others' experiences. Sorry.


I said earlier that I'd never seen a ghost but that's not strictly true. Aged about 9 or 10, I was visited by the ghost of a recently deceased member of a steel Orchestra that used to rehearse next to where I lived. Lovely memory- the orchestral goings on, not the ghost!

The bedtime visit was really scary but I long ago put it down to the over-active imagination of a child.

I've had a handful of paranormal experiences in adulthood but no ghosts.

fabfor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would now say "some evidence for telepathy".


binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok, fair enough - which of Sheldrake's studies (or any others for that matter) do you think demonstrate "some evidence for telepathy"


fabfor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What can I say, other than I note your opinion?


I don't know how else to phrase it, I thought it was a pretty direct question.


Either you think there is evidence for telepathy or not. If your conclusion is now that there isn't then ok, none (as yet) exists. If you think you have found evidence (even "some") then where is it? It's a genuine question, I had a look at the first two studies, neither of which were evidence by any stretch of the imagination (and by his own admission) but maybe you can pinpoint some other research?

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's already been a thread on actual

> experiences, the tone this thread took may have

> inhibited further sharing of experiences. If I

> have time I'll find the previous thread if your

> after actual stories.


If I have contributed to the 'tone' inhibiting further sharing, that it wasn't my intention. I do however think its important to remember the distinction between recalled experiences (anecdotal) and scientific evidence. That's not to say that scientific evidence won't be found, but I hope we can agree we're not there yet.

fabfor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And thanks for the truly fascinating article in

> Nature. I'm time-impoverished at the moment but

> can hardly wait to study it properly. For the

> moment, it looks like exactly the kind of research

> that could be used to support Dr. Sheldrake's

> Morphic Resonance proposal - or is it unreasonable

> to suggest this??


Fairly unreasonable. The evidence suggests a learned behavioural trait can be inherited through material in the gametes (they gave the mice to foster parents who weren't frightened of the same things). We know learned behaviour is not passed along through the genetic code as such, but there is a possible mechanism in the epigenetic (i.e. the mechanisms that regulate which genes are expressed or suppressed), and there's evidence of unexpected epigenetic changes in the offspring. We're not clear on how that happens, or how those changes are related to the behaviour. Or whether the initial experiment was dodgy. But the clues we have now suggest the answer is more likely to be found by repeating versions of the experiment, and looking for epigenetic clues, than by trying to look at fields we can't detect and which may not exist at all.


> "If I were a proper scientist, I'd note that idea

> down, design an experiment to test it and publish

> my results if I got any."


> Come on, be fair! It's also legitimate to collate

> others' research to support a new theory

> (actually, the idea behind Morphic Resonance

> predates Sheldrake).


It is perfectly legitimate to look for evidence to support a new theory, but you have to have a theory first. At the moment Sheldrake's got a hunch about some hypothetical, poorly-described and undetectable fields with a non-existent origin or mechanism and suggests that they might explain everything we can't explain, from deja-vu to who shot Kennedy. But so could aliens. So could the spirits that live in things. So could the blasted Easter Bunny. It's unfounded, copper-bottomed, rubber-stamped, unadulterated, utter, gibbering, woo.


> Anyhow, I like old Rupert and admire his

> intellectual honesty and courage but we'll have to

> disagree on that, eh?


That's nice. And as it would be very churlish of me to point out that's the one thing we don't disagree on, I won't.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm all for some good old ghost stories.


So am I, to be honest. There's nothing I like better than meeting up with the coven in Dulwich Woods, where after a bit of bat-charming, we'll share spooky stories and toasted crumpets. But perhaps that's because it's about the only time I allow myself to wear anything floaty. One of the best stories is the Tale of the Haunted Outfitters, which I can't give justice to on this forum, mostly because it's not mine, but which would surely strike a plangent chord in the heart of any gent who's experienced the back room of a provincial shirtsmiths.


Sadly, local spooklore is very deficient on all counts. The Ghoul of G****C*** Lane rarely gets beyond the title, the same dimensionless salesperson seems to hang out in every shop on the Lane and almost everything else turns out to be the council. There might have been potential in the sportive genres of clowns and scarecrows, which might easily have stolen what spectral thunder there is, but it's all died a depressingly unsuspicious death. A few more noises from the Grove Tavern, though, and we might have something to work with.

"Morphic Resonance"


What happens when you try to replicate his studies?


This: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ruperts-resonance


Of course I'll never get to know what being telepathic is really like because according to Sheldrake:

"Skeptics dampen the morphic field, whereas believers enhance it."


Which basically boils down to only being able to experience something if you believe in it which also boils down to something everyone else calls faith.


Which is fine, but faith sure as sh!t ain't science.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Binary - no i wasn't digging at anybody, just

> saying why (probably why) Louisa didn't get what

> she originally asked for as OP, i.e. "I wondered

> if anyone else had seen or heard of any local

> ghostly activities?"


Yes it has gone a bit awry but that was bound to happen when people started citing bogus papers and referencing random university departments as if to validate any of this stuff at the expense of any real evidence...you can't do that without expecting a response.


And since someone mentioned the Scole Experiments, here's one for the road:


http://skeptoid.com/mobile/4179

In typical EDF style a thread goes a million miles off-topic. This was not meant to be a debate about the existence of life itself, it was about sharing stories and sightings for those interested. I may as well have gone out in the middle of a gale and whistled in the hope someone could hear me.


Louisa.

Hi Louisa - I hear you, loud clear......


I used to know someone who was regularly visited by an old man, in the middle of the night; he would sit by the edge of her bed for a while and then disappear. What amazed me is that she was never freaked out by this visitation.

MagMag I've heard about these night visitations. I've been informed by a psychic that activity tends to be greatest in the early hours. It sounds as though he was just visiting to say hello or to reassure perhaps? These are my favourite visitations. Full of love and not at all intended to frighten.


Louisa.

MagMag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Louisa - I hear you, loud clear......

>

> I used to know someone who was regularly visited

> by an old man, in the middle of the night; he

> would sit by the edge of her bed for a while and

> then disappear. What amazed me is that she was

> never freaked out by this visitation.


Sounds like she was dreaming.

A friend of mine when she was little looked out through her bedroom window one day and saw her aunt walking around the side of the house to the back door, as she often did. A bit later that day she was told her aunt had died.

"A friend. A family member. I was told."


Over and over again


A lot less "I was there and I definitely saw/recorded/was with someone else who saw same thing"


And instead of "hmmm good point" it's all " some people don't want to believe and are just plain rude bwah hah hah"


Grow the fuck up people


Santa. Not real

Yeti. Not real

UFO. Not real

Ghosts. Not real

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Farmers groups say 35% of farms will be affected while the Treasury reckons its 27% - neither figure is a tiny portion. The problem is farming is often asset rich but cash poor meaning that those who inherit farms and have to pay the tax will likely need to sell land to pay for it and could well further impact the cash poor nature and productivity of that farm. I would have thought those who align on the left would be welcoming farmers protesting on the streets against a government making their lives more difficult. Good on them. Makes a change from tube and rail strikes at least! I was shocked to read that the average weekly earnings for agricultural workers was significantly lower than the national average.  Clearly Labour doesn't consider these working people.
    • A tax change that affects a tiny portion of farmers livelihoods and income - mass protest and wild accusations on forums like this    Brexit which impacted farmers income and uk food security far far far more ? Crickets. Absolutely nothing. “Price worth paying mate “   Don’t  be fooled about what this is about - it’s isn’t IHT.  
    • In deed, doesn't matter if he is a talented presenter he is, in my view, an rrrrrrsss.  Interestingly Farage was pronounced with a hard g.  But he affected the continental soft g.  Similar to the UK and US pronunciations of garage.  I've worked with people who were at school with him
    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...