Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The one (still empty long after completion) at the

> junction of Overhill & Underhill Roads.


Yes - top prize to this one. It has absolutely no merit whatsoever, either to look at or (see above) to live in.

That sprawling collection of nonsense called GV15 by ED railway station. Unimaginative and depressing.


DKH is pretty good; the wood and dark grey look modern and well-coordinated. Ditto the block opposite - Mary Seacow Court or something - especially when the sun hits the bright brick-red staircase in the evening.


NB: 3-bed flat in Overhill/Underhill block: ?390k.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

>

> > They could fill it with water and fish - it

> might

> > make a nice aquarium.

>

> Swapping the fish for Foxtons employees would be a

> better idea.


yes, the swap would be good, but keep some hungry sharks in there too, for the sport!

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nancysmum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > yes, the swap would be good, but keep some

> hungry

> > sharks in there too, for the sport!

>

> Might not need any


I love the way this forum can turn almost any conversation into estate agent genocide. Keep it up folks it?s far more entertaining than racism and homophobia which seem to be the flavour of the week at the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
    • I see. But as I read it, Tesco would still need the agreement of the owners/ leaseholder to submit proposals, so would need Poundland’s cooperation? I suppose we’ll have to wait while this plays out. There’s applications re this site on the Southwark planning portal dating back over 70 years. In 1954, Woolworth’s applied to convert the original 4 shops here (Nos 29-35) into one Woolies but the council refused because the flats above the shops would be lost and there was a local housing shortage following the war. Small businesses being displaced by big chains on Lordship Lane was already a trend back then.  
    • I see what you mean.  Perhaps the "alcohol licensing flyer for Tesco Express on the Poundland site" confirmed by the OP has been removed then.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...