Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not nitpicking. Spouting that stuff on social media might well be a sackable offence. Being an ignorant racist isn't. You might find the difference trivial, but I'd rather avoid the prospect of witch-hunting. Do you think teachers who support the BNP should be sacked?

Facebook has its uses. I think this sort of thing trends to happen less often because, perversely, broadcasting to the world involves less forethought than knowing your mum/son/girl at the office you fancy, is going to read it.


Plus I quite like the weird, slightly voyeuristic intimacy of all these kids with food on their faces, it gives you the illusion of being in touch with people you genuinely miss.

Obviously I'd rather see them for real, but it rarely works out that way.

Plus the annoying ones you block.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BrandNewGuy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Do you think teachers

> > who support the BNP should be sacked?

>

>

> If it's reflected in the things they are teaching

> the kids, then yes.


Agreed, but what if it isn't?

If it doesn't affect their job, then I don't think anyone should be policing people's views.


I think the issue is probably more worrying when someone's job involves power over others, especially if your views are racist and you have power over those groups who are the object of your racism.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BrandNewGuy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Do you think teachers who support the BNP should be sacked?

>

> If it's reflected in the things they are teaching the kids, then yes.


But that was never the question, was it? It was, "should we sack teachers who support the BNP". And that is a dangerous line to tread. Should we sack all teachers who support communist or socialist parties? Should we sack all teachers are sexist/radical feminist? Should we sack all teachers who strike?


Should we sack all teachers who disagree with my or your world views?

Er, I'm pretty sure I said no to that already Loz. If someone's personal political/religious/prejucial views don't impact on the way they do their job, then it's nobody's business.


For people in a position of power, I'd say it is just more important to check their impact more thoroughly.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The usefulness of Facebook has an inverse correlation to the number of your friends with

> babies less than four years old. No, your baby sleeping is not news, even on Facebook's low

> scale.


A new one today - a posting of a child's pic with the caption '22 months old today'.


Which begs the question... when do parents cease 'celebrating' monthly birthdays? I would have hoped somewhere in the 6 to 12 month old period, but it seems not.

I'm not on FB or Twitter, but can I ask why you look at (or have a feed from) someone who you clearly have no respect for?


Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The usefulness of Facebook has an inverse

> correlation to the number of your friends with

> > babies less than four years old. No, your baby

> sleeping is not news, even on Facebook's low

> > scale.

>

> A new one today - a posting of a child's pic with

> the caption '22 months old today'.

>

> Which begs the question... when do parents cease

> 'celebrating' monthly birthdays? I would have

> hoped somewhere in the 6 to 12 month old period,

> but it seems not.

Tr? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not on FB or Twitter, but can I ask why you

> look at (or have a feed from) someone who you

> clearly have no respect for?


There is a pretty major difference between being a bit tired of a stream of baby pictures and 'clearly having no respect for' someone. Well, at least it is in my world.


I'm guessing you are a reasonably recent parent, so you probably have absolutely no idea that people aren't as enamoured with your kids as you want them to be. But, trust me, they're not.

Anyone who has followed the HIV/AIDS epidemic since the '80s would have an awareness of the issues surrounding sub-Saharan Africa. At the end of 2011 0.8% of adults(15-49 years) were living with HIV/AIDS but in sub-Saharan Africa 4.9% of adults are affected. And it has been said before that the methods of sexual activity in Africa leads to the HIV being transmitted more readily.

In essence identical.

uncleglen seems to think it was an an intelligent assessment of Africa. I was trying to rephrase it in a way he might see why it's offensive.

So no doubt he'll quote the prevalence of HIV among Scottish drug users due to unsafe practices.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And it has been said before that the methods of sexual activity in Africa

> leads to the HIV being transmitted more readily.



What methods of suxual activity? I'm intrigued by what these African people are doing differently in the sack.

Nothing differen in the sack....


More partners, men more likely to be unfaithfull in marriage, less willingness to use condoms (in marrage it's a sign of 'guilt'/out of marrage prostitues paid a premium for unsafe sex), heavy use of prostititues in transient communities such as truck drivers and miners (without using condoms).


Added to that idiots such as catholic priests saying that condoms don't prevent AIDS and the last SA PM denying aids was a problem


*source; recent article in the Observer before anyone jumps down my throat- believe it or don't

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ever heard of GOOGLE



Yes I have funnily enough, but as you'd posted, I just thought I'd ask you to expland. It was just the term "methods of sexual activity" that got me wondering. I know all the stuff Quids has pointed out, but that term just sounded far more interesting.

Exactly, taken at face value it basically says that black Africans are destined for it (rather than it being a product of poverty, ignorance and evil propaganda), and that white people are immune.

In fact, all it really does is expose her ignorance and stupidity so bravo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...