Jump to content

Ale in the bishop/actress


jackoaky

Recommended Posts

Related but not strictly bishop issue. Ignorance on part of the bar staff is also the problem, In order to get a decent pint it must be pulled in big drafts to create a head, this settles to add flavour, most pubs draw it in small tugs and measure it to the half/ pint line if you're have a light ale mix, not only is this tight fisted, it leaves a flat tasteless pint, they should always serve over the half way mark to ensure a head and happy customer! It's a false economy to eek out a meagre serving as said previously the stuff goes off.

Try the Dulwich Woodhouse, new management served me a 1st class real ale, Mines a Ram and Special!!

  • 8 months later...

Any pub that cannot even get the Lager right is going to struggle with any real ale.


The Bishop simply does not sell enough ale so if you go there in the evening, the first

pint is likely to of been in the pipe all day.


The Bishop is only interested in selling bottled beers and Jaeger-Bombs.


The EDT sells a lot of real ale so there is a constant flow through the pipes.


DulwichFox

Sounds like they are not keeping it properly and maybe not cleaning the lines regularly. Also some of the craft beers from small brewers will have a limited shelf life. If they stock local beer i'm sure one of the brewers would be happy to explain to the staff how to keep and serve it, no producer wants customers to think their stock is poor because it has been kept or served badly.


Proper beer, like all decent food and drink, needs to be served by someone who knows how to treat it. If you keep real ale badly then it will show.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...