Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,


My wife had a very frightening experience this morning walking down Crystal Palace Rd to take our son to nursery. He stopped to look at a cement mixer (Bob the Builder fixated!) in a front garden and whilst he was standing there a very strong gust of wind lifted up a large section of metal grille fencing (6ft x 6ft)on the edge of the property high into the air - completely by chance it fell down sideways and landed across the pavement behind him but could just have easily hit him. My very shaken wife spoke to the builders (who saw it all from inside the house but then ducked down when seen) later on but they werent native English speakers and feigned ignorance of what she was trying to explain.


Long intro, but what I want to know is who can we contact within the Council to try and ensure they secure the site properly? We were lucky this morning but when my wife walked back after nursery the fence had been put back (again very insecurely) into its concrete stand. We'd hate to have it happen again with worse consequences. She's contacted Building Regs people at council but they have made it clear it's not their responsibility re H&S on private properties. Any advice would be good.


Thanks


Dave

Sounds horrible, but to be fair if the sheet was lying down on the ground flat no-one could reasonably expect it to be lifted up and moved through the air by the wind. Having seen it though, the builders should definitely secure remaining items which could be lifted by strong wind.
Would suggest no one was harmed, and people stop thinking H&S only applies to things that could've happend to a kid,but didn't. Just 'cos you got a kid/s doesn't mean everything is a risk-just means YOU have extra responsibilty and YOU need to look after kid-not everyone else.

unlurked Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would suggest no one was harmed, and people stop

> thinking H&S only applies to things that could've

> happend to a kid,but didn't. Just 'cos you got a

> kid/s doesn't mean everything is a risk-just means

> YOU have extra responsibilty and YOU need to look

> after kid-not everyone else.



Good grief. Why dont you lurk off.

unlurked Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would suggest no one was harmed, and people stop

> thinking H&S only applies to things that could've

> happend to a kid,but didn't. Just 'cos you got a

> kid/s doesn't mean everything is a risk-just means

> YOU have extra responsibilty and YOU need to look

> after kid-not everyone else.


xxxxxx


And you prevent a loose fence which is not obviously loose from blowing onto your kid by looking after the kid - how exactly?


What a load of b******s.

I'm a (Union) Health and Safety Rep for my workplace. I'm surprised the council don't want to know - perhaps it's a matter of getting the right number... I would have though Southwark 'Building Control' would be the place to start. Their website says:


Dangerous structures


A dangerous structure is any structure which could endanger somebody because of its condition. This includes buildings; parts of buildings i.e. loose slates, tiles, garden walls, fences and hoardings.

How to report a dangerous structure

Please call 020 7525 5397/5582/5596 Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm or 0845 600 1285 outside normal working hours.

Email: building.control@southwark.gov.uk


Please tell us

Address of the danger

Description of what you consider to be dangerous and it's location

Any information known about the site ownership or access

Your name and contact number so that we can advise you of the action taken (optional)

The council has statutory duties to deal with dangerous structures under the London Local Authorities Act 2000 and the London Building Acts (Amendment) Act, 1939, to ensure that all structures within the borough which are considered dangerous are made safe with the shortest possible delay.

Buildings can become dangerous at any time and for a variety of reasons ranging from settlement or old age, vehicle impact, vandalism or design defects, to more dramatic causes such as fire, explosion or storm damage.

We work closely with the Police, London Fire Brigade and other emergency services as well as external government agencies such as the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the Environmental Agency to ensure buildings in Southwark are safe.



Sounds like a small site - see here if you're interested in the builder's responsibilities re risk management etc: http://www.hse.gov.uk/construction/areyou/builder.htm


Good luck.

Helen

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Aria did a good job fixing a leak in our bathroom. He was very thorough and made two extra visits to make sure the job was done well. Highly recommended.
    • As a diminutive (5ft 1) woman who regularly attends the park with her four children - all under 5; two of them (twins) in a push-chair - the thread caught my eye. If there identifiable troublemakers likely to be there I want to know what they look like so I can avoid them. Isn't that "strange" of me, wishing to avoid harm coming to my children?? 😲 I have been discussing the ludicrous responses to this thread 🧵 (which I bet £100 exclusively emanate from bourgeois native Brits) with work colleagues (you would be hard pressed to find a more 'diverse' bunch in terms of age and ethnicity - except we are all female). One colleague (a Ukranian lady) made a perceptive observation that everyone seemed to agree with. When British newspapers and news websites mention an offender (e.g. 'police are asking the general public for assistance in seeking the alleged offender who is a middle-aged male'), she always assumes the offender is not of white British heritage since, if the offender is white this is usually mentioned, but seldom the other way around. Until recently racial prejudice was a thing of the past (unless in the most hardcore of families), now it is creeping back and one important factor is the perception that the indigenous general public are not being treated fairly with this sort of dishonest - some would say activist - reportage. An attitude that clearly informed the bizarre claim that my concerned inquiry was  "strange". Fact is it was anything but strange. What is strange is people denying the evidence of their own eyes and - in this case - casting aspersions on a concerned parent. 
    • Yesterday we received about 3 weeks worth of post. This included duplicate documents where we'd had to ask for another copy since the first copy never arrived, bank papers, my new driving licence and one mis-delivery.  We'd spent ages in the last few weeks either on the phone or convoluted websites trying to chase these things. I'd rally like to co,plain but have a feeling I'd be wasting my time.
    • sad news one of the few shops offering good value
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...