Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Morning everyone


The summary slides from the Haberdashers? consultation evening on 10th July are attached here. Thanks for your patience in waiting for these. Hopefully they are a useful reminder for those of you who were there and give an idea of what was discussed for those who couldn?t make it.


The feedback forms so far are telling us that most of you are worried about the admissions policy and the fact that the hospital site (where we hope the school will be located ? the only site that?s big enough locally) is not where we really need the school to be, since most of the families who need a new co-ed secondary school live to the East of Lordship Lane. We know that there are secondary school ?black holes? (many of the parent steering group members live in one of these) and many of you are keen to make sure that the proposed new school allows those families to be in catchment.


So that the steering group can support Habs to resolve the issues around catchment please can as many of you as possible fill out the feedback form here:


http://www.haaf.org.uk/New-East-Dulwich-Secondary-School-1


It doesn?t matter how many times you fill out the feedback form ? Habs will pick out any duplicate names and group the feedback under areas of concern. Under the admissions section can we ask you to consider:


? Do you live in an admissions ?black hole? for a co-ed secondary school? If so where is it? Where are the other parts of ED which are not served by a local co-ed secondary?


? Do you support the idea of a nodal point that would allow distance to be measured (for admissions purposes) from a location other than the school?


If you have any questions or concerns please post them here (constructive posts are appreciated) or you can email Haberdashers directly at [email protected]


Thanks again, we appreciate your support and input.

It was also on BBC news last week.

Shocking that they seemingly tried to keep it quiet.



Just out of interest, I noticed on the leaflet that came through our door that the planned new school is being referred to as 'Hatcham East Dulwich', no sign of 'Haberdashers' or 'Askes'.

Is there a reason for this?

Hi Vik,

Not really. The Police told them to not make it public and don't talk about it for fear of scuppering the Police investigations. I can't imagine anyone thinking the Police would take over two years and still no court case.

I hope that all the publicity won't get in the way of real prosecutions.


With respect to the name I/we requested a shorter name after consulting a couple of months ago with supporters. It was being talked about as Haberdashers' Aske's East Dulwich College or Academy or Hospital School. Hatcham East Dulwich is much easier. Hence moving towards the name. Which makes me realise I've not correct this thread title and will do that now. Useful prod. Thank you.

I just wish we could get the Harris people to be this flexible. Harris Girls East Dulwich Academy, etc. is too much.

Yeah I thought the press were scraping the barrel a bit trying to suggest there was an effort to cover something up. It was sinsible to ask parents to keep it quiet whilst investigations were ongoing.


Pretty crazy that the guy was able to do what he's done though, and is still a free man.

Hi Otta,

I couldn't agree more. Even though it was a lot of money the offences were caught over two years ago.


I'm still hopeful whoever committed the crime will be prosecuted successfully. It is reported to have been found with the change of systems brought in by the federation with a new CEO and new team. So the current team found it. The improvement in systems and procedures is such that Haberdashers' are now viewed as role models by EFA and DfE.

Civil proceedings have found for the federation and they're in the process of recovering as much money as possible. I'm hopeful some of that recovered money can be used for our new secondary school build.

http://www.reeves.co/academies-news-updates/


The problem with keeping it quiet, it is then hard to see how big the problem is.

Link above, scroll down to 23rd June. Are you reporting all incidents of fraud? Is your internet

security software up to date.


It seems fraud is a concern for the EFA amongst the academy sector.

James Can you tell me if it was the EFA that tried to recover this money, as in the case of the special needs

school, earlier this year. Where again people were asked not to comment.


http://m.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/crime/police-bail-the-three-people-arrested-in-fraud-probe-at-east-durham-school-1-6538900

Hi TE44,

Habs are damned if they do and damned if they don't. If they keep things quiet as directed by the Police others say why did you keep it quiet. If they'd publicised it and risked scuppering a court case we'd all damn them for being irresponsible.


But I can assure you the risk of fraud is a huge concern for all responsible public sector organisations and their leadership. I sit on Southwark Council Audit & Governance committee - since it was first started in 2007 - we've seen huge strides in detecting fraud - http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2014/07/20/southwark-council-fraud/

One of my key actions has been to push to invite directors of departments to attend committee meetings if they didnt ensure audit actions were completed in a timely. This appears to have helped give this the focus required with audits actions now being regularly completed on time.


The EFA highligting risks is perfectly normal activity that responsible councils will also be doing to their schools. It's just the EFA does it more publicly.


My understanding is that the Habs Federation have been trying to recover its money. Fingers crossed they succeed and that sufficient assets such as houses make this possible.

The Durham School story you've linked to the school management appears to have been the culprits and hence why EFA pursuing them. Totally different context.


Ironic that whichever provider open our new secondary school will be strongly encouraged by the EFA to adopt Habs Federation financial management practices - which after being beefed up are considered best practice..

Hi Otta,

Yes, this point has been made but it is certainly more manageable name than Haberdashers' Aske's East Dulwich College/Acamedy School.

But I'm open to suggestions...


Hospital school was cosndiered but have real schools in local hospitals for sick children so I don't like that despite it picking up on using the hospital site.

I think the Federation refer to the Telegraph Hill school as "Hatcham college" (because it's "close" to Hatcham), so if the new school was part of the bit of the Federation they'd want to keep Hatcham to differentiate from Knights Academy etc. See the snappily named "Hatcham Temple Grove Free Schoo, Haberdasher Askes Hatcham College"

but doesn't HADS end up to similar to HAED which is what we don't want at all?! So Charter would be a lot less confusing.

Where is Hatcham anyway? What about Aske's School ED. This whole 'Academy' thing will probably be a flash in the pan so we might as well stick with the long established English norms of either 'School' or 'College'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...