Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So,s he,s been aquitted and thats the law of the land, but I still can,t make my mind up on this one, espicially following on from todays comments that he couldn,t have shot Ms Dando, as he was stalking another woman at that time. I know a lot has been made of his low intellect but it just makes one wonder that he,s doing himself no favours in trying to alleviate any lingering suspicion by comments such as these. Any views?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/
Share on other sites

Seems a perfectly reasonable alibi.Surely no self-respecting Stalker can do a Professional job on 2 people at the same time..and as he was busy stalking a "person unknown" that would exonerate him as far as I'm concerned.

In fact he could approach the person who he is really stalking and ask them if they would not mind terribly veryifying his story.Sure they won't mind.

Case Dismissed! Next!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122867
Share on other sites

I can't believe he did it, not proven is as good as guilty, it assumes you have committed the crime but there is not enough evidence against you for a conviction. Mind you all Scots are guilty in my opinion.


I think this is another case of the Police taking the easy way out. A clearly very inadequate individual with little ability to challenge them and their authority. Look at all the other cases, Birmingham six, that poor woman accused of killing her babies, when they were cot deaths and subsequently killed herself after she was freed. Christ, if we still had the death penalty, what then?


All you read about it points to a professional killing, the question is why, and of course who. There are loads of rumours, but unless the Police actually investigate the crime properly we?ll never know.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122873
Share on other sites

What do peopel think about Scotland Yard's head of homicide statement:


"Commander Simon Foy, head of Scotland Yard's homicide and serious crime command, said: "We are disappointed by today's verdict but especially disappointed for Jill's family and friends. However, we respect the decision of the court." "


Sounded a bit defensive and inappropriate to me. Why didn't he just say "Barry George is still guilty in my eyes. Bloody do-gooders. It's political correctness gone MAD I tell thee!"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122874
Share on other sites

I agree with you Oldie, I don't think he did it either given the information about him. He was an easy target.

Professional hit from the way it was done. Maybe something to do with Crimewatch although why? Also I read she had received critical letters regarding her support for the Kosovans at the time but again, why bother with her?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122877
Share on other sites

His convition always seemed iffy. This was a ruthless and seemingly planned execution style murder which took place in daylight. Given George's health and alleged general inability to organise his life it never seemed likely he would have the nous to pull it off.

A weird bloke and a nuisance, certainly but a killer, I don't think so.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-122881
Share on other sites

I agree with tony.suburbs the alibi of "it couldnt of been me gov, i was stalking someone else at the time" hardly makes me want to have this bloke back in society although take on board that this individual is rather complex etc etc... how do people feel about his compensation claim? i accept the man has lost 8 years of his life and there has been a miscarriage of justice but possibly half million? i read somewhere that the formula takes into account loss of earnings and emotional distress etc... i'd like to know what he did for a living....
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123015
Share on other sites

Dunno what he did for a living but if I had done 8 years inside for murder that I did not do I would want a darn site more than ?500k. Have you ever been inside a prison? Dunno which one he was in but I have been in Pentonville and the Scrubs (professionally, not as an inmate) and they are fooking horrible places!


I always thought it a little too convenient that they arrested the local weirdo for this one. I guess we will never know the truth though.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123036
Share on other sites

lordship_bod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with tony.suburbs the alibi of "it couldnt

> of been me gov, i was stalking someone else at the

> time" hardly makes me want to have this bloke back

> in society although take on board that this

> individual is rather complex etc etc... how do

> people feel about his compensation claim? i accept

> the man has lost 8 years of his life and there has

> been a miscarriage of justice but possibly half

> million? i read somewhere that the formula takes

> into account loss of earnings and emotional

> distress etc... i'd like to know what he did for a

> living....



how much would it take for you to spend the next 8 years in prison?


i wouldn't do it for half a million

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123039
Share on other sites

There was also ?250,000 being talked about. The final figure may well be in between the two. Or it may not. Speculating about it at this stage seems pointless. Doing 8 years inside for a crime you've not done must be unimaginable.

Regardless of what he might have earned in the time, he deserves compensation for what he went through.

Still he's obviously started to seek charitable donations from the News Of The World and Sky TV.

Good to see Rupert Murdoch doing his bit.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123052
Share on other sites

In the trade it is called, being framed, fitted up, put any sap in to release us to nick motorists and cigar butt droppers.

I remember having a conversation about this case when they stated they had found 'a loner' and Barry George fell into the hands of the police and from that moment he was gonna be 'it'.

Conveniently forgetting that one third of the population live alone, and are 'loners'.


He was a simple mark who had no help from any source except his solicitor, but he is not mentioned, why(?)

Is this another case where the solicitor and/or court is unfit for purpose(?)


British justice in this case, and most of the cases that Charles Dickens wrote about

from Pickwick Papers to Bleak House, just stinks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3910-barry-george/#findComment-123115
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And the Sainsbury’s own brand chocolate mini rolls have gone from £1.15 to £1.40 overnight, so 22%-ish. I prefer them them to the Cadbury original because they have a lot more chocolate on them, presumably because they’re made in a less advanced factory. I would think that getting the Rizla thin coating of chocolate that Cadbury’s accountants demand onto a piece of sponge is quite a sophisticated operation. Discuss.
    • Another recommendation for Leon. He was able to come out to our electrical elergency within 24 hours of me contacting him. His communication was great and whilst he could not solve our problem, he was able to perform tests to identify this and did so quickly and efficiently. He charging  is very fair and his manner very pleasant. Both of these in contrast to some experiences I have had elsewhere.    happy to put my name to recommending Leon. His number is  07707 925039.
    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...