Jump to content

Recommended Posts

it is all a huge hassle, but perhaps if james had collected the right info in the first place before spreading genuine alarm and outrage we would not have anything like as much wasted fury. 3 mini-closures a day is about the same as they had already pinched. this just makes their greedy intrusion legal and screw the tax-payers. in the meantime james, check things out more thoroughly.

Is three mini closures really that bad? Certainly on my street, builders regularly block the street to load and unload materials, and to crane things into sites. It's an unfortunate annoyance about living in London but inevitable.


If the guy wants to build a swimming pool under his house - which incidentally seems to being built on a piece of brownfield land with, presumably, the necessary planning permissions - why is it so outrageous? As long as it's built properly and with the necessary precautions it shouldn't create any structural issues for anyone else. Much easier to put a basement on a new build property (and much less risky) than tunnelling under an old Victorian or Edwardian house - which happens much more frequently.


Personally the idea of it all offends me an awful lot less than the demolition of the house on the corner of Elsie Road and East Dulwich Grove - which has looked terribly sad as a lovely Victorian villa has been stripped to the ground piece by piece to be replaced by a mock Victoriana block of flats.

What offends me Jimmyraj is the fact that it will have been going for 2 years by the time they finish this.


It's a tiny plot with virtually no access from the road (it's like a wedge shape, with the narrow point on the road) which means all their kit & debris just lives on the street and has done for 12 months already. A pool on a site like this is crazy - yeah good for the owner, sure it adds a lot of value - but the complexity of the project has subjected a lot of people to some major inconvenience.

What a typical James storm in a tea cup Barber post. Some people might believe that a swimming pool is excessive (I do) but I really don't see what relevance it to this discussion. Would the road closures have been less bad if they were building something else?


Also at a time when police should be focusing their resources on tackling crime, to advice people to call the police to deal with *intermittent* road closures three times a day is downright irresponsible.

bloodyjon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a typical James storm in a tea cup Barber

> post. Some people might believe that a swimming

> pool is excessive (I do) but I really don't see

> what relevance it to this discussion. Would the

> road closures have been less bad if they were

> building something else?


xxxxxxx


That is unfair to James.


And yes in my view the road closures would be less bad if they were building something else - something of use to the wider community, for example.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bloodyjon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What a typical James storm in a tea cup Barber

> > post. Some people might believe that a swimming

> > pool is excessive (I do) but I really don't see

> > what relevance it to this discussion. Would the

> > road closures have been less bad if they were

> > building something else?

>

> xxxxxxx

>

> That is unfair to James.

>

> And yes in my view the road closures would be less

> bad if they were building something else -

> something of use to the wider community, for

> example.


Like using the patch and toasted etc as soup kitchens for the needy


why should they not build what has been approved legally by the council

Just for information, the Construction Management Plan that the applicant was required to submit as one of the conditions attached to the granting of his main application (12/AP/1700), was approved on 19 March and can be downloaded from http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeDocs&TheSystemkey=9548409.


Another of the conditions (#9) was the submission of a Contaminated Land Assessment. That was submitted as application 13/APP/0337 http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeDocs&TheSystemkey=9548404. Also there is a Planning Statement which includes mention of safe removal of contaminated earth. For some reason that application is still flagged as pending, though I suspect that might be an adminstrative oversight due to the proliferation of the subsidiary re-applications.

How can you, James Barber, name and shame somebody in public for having a house extension?

What they do is legal, they have permission and you are creating a storm

against people, giving their full address and name here.

I can see it is disturbing to the neighbours, inconvenient for a

lot of people in the area. But this bashing in public is just

over the top and not justified.

Ok, let's see then. Let us see if it only amounts to 3 x daily 30 minute slots over a 6 month period. Seems that the project is relying on very patient,very tolerant neighbours. James is just looking out for the residents it affects, in my opinion, of course. These projects always overun, and yes it pays to be passive, for the sake of ones mental health, but these contractors do take advantage somewhat.


Dialing 101 is a stretch too far though, I must admit!

That's a little harsh Falklands.

I was sent an email by council officials telling me Crawthew Grove would be closed for 18 months. I alerted people to this. Those officials have since said it wont be closed for 18 months and only up to 3 times a day for 30mins. They've not explained why so much of the road has been handed over to the builders for offices, huge skips, lavatories.


Hi EDLove, That looks great. I just wish they could put a little more thought into planning how to achieve this desgin being thoughtful about impact on other residents.

enjoy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How can you, James Barber, name and shame somebody

> in public for having a house extension?


xxxxxxxx


The information re the person's name and full address was already in the public domain.


Anybody can have access to it quite easily.


And this issue is not about "having a house extension". It's about considerable inconvenience being caused to neighbours and other users of a quite narrow backstreet by somebody wanting to build a basement swimming pool and - apparently - cinema (!!!!) in a relatively small space with - apparently - restricted access.


I think people round here should be over the moon to have such a proactive councillor who looks out for the community's best interests, not be constantly slagging him off at every opportunity, often getting their facts wrong.


Many councillors attend a few meetings a year and - er - that's it.

Hi rahrahrah,

I must say I feel relieved the original statement and advertisement by council officials is apparently wrong. They stated closure for 18months. They've done nothing to correct or readvertise that it's upto 18 months or to get the street name correct! Some have been told up to 3 street closures a day each of 15mins. Others have been told 30mins.

Baffled how something so simple could have been made so complicated.

Crawthew Grove has basically been closed at least the last two months anyway. The sightlines round that corner have now been so reduced by the near-permanent plant, machinery and debris, anyone would have to be suicidal to try and go around it. I am utterly stupefied by what this owner is getting away with - in any other part of London he'd be paying a gargantuan fee for taking up so much public parking space. My views have nothing to do with the ambition of the development - it's the utter chaos the owner is causing to realise it. AND there is no incentive of any kind to get them to proceed at a pace which is commensurate with the public interest. Will they be paying anything for the baron-like power to close a public street at will??


I note, James, that you haven't come back to my earlier request on another thread re. the incredible damage the contractors have done to the road in recent months. Can you press for full professional reinstatement of the entire road surface at their cost please.

Hi worldwiser,

Sorry I've not come back before.

I don't have an answer yet but have asked.


As you say I'm also agog at how they've been allowed to undertake their works. It sets a terrible precendence.

With London house prices predicted to rise by 50% by 2018 we can expect to see a lot more of these types of basement works.

ah! so Scott strikes again!


He cleverly uses the EDF to drum up publicity and business for his pub. He then sells it to a chain, and not at a loss, I expect. Funnily enough it's a lot better behaved as a neighbour to us queiter folk since Scott left. So no tears there.


But sad to see that he's got into the habit of helping himself at the expense of his neighbours.

Thanks to James for doing his job and highlighting this blatant disregard for their convenience.

EDmummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh my,I have major house envy. Love modern design

> and the plans look amazing. On the flip side my

> thoughts go out to the poor neighbours during the

> build phase.


xxxxxx


The whole corner of the road is full of skips, building materials and a huge toilet block.


Cars can scarcely get through.


Why do they need more than one bog? Have all the builders got dodgy bladders or something?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...