Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I created this map using ward level data from the Metropolitan Police. Similar to the Met's own map, but they only show two-year changes. I thought it was interesting to look at a longer-term trend. It shows that compared to the rest of London, crime rates in this area are fairly low. The Lane ward is higher, but has seen one of the fastest rates of decline over the past 5 and 10 years.


Overall crime rate for London is 91 crimes per 1000 population, and Southwark is 110.


Of the 624 London wards, these are the rankings of selected wards...


The Lane, 51st highest rate (150 crimes per 1000 population). 105th highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-28%).

Village, 331st highest rate (74 crimes per 1000 population). 167th highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-24%).

East Dulwich, 375th highest rate (70 crimes per 1000 population). 353rd highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-14%).

South Camberwell, 451st highest rate (63 crimes per 1000 population). 256th highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-19%).

Peckham Rye, 455th highest rate (62 crimes per 1000 population). 219th highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-21%).



http://datacollator.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/london-crime-statistics-by-ward.html

very interesting - but as rates are given per 1000 of the population which sounds totally fair

wouldn't that result in skewing results against areas where the population may be low but actual numbers of people physically in the streets high. eg places where many people congregate for transport, entertainment or shopping

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow. This backs up what the police tell us every

> time we attend the Police Ward Panel! Love living

> here!


That's because these figures are invented by Plod itself (see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25022680), allegedly according to whatever gets targets met or makes a good case for more funding.


The British Crime Survey is regarded (by government and others, when it suits them) as being more reliable. However, the BCS is done through interviews with about 50,000 randomly-selected people, so won't be directly comparable at ward level, and won't be fine-grained enough to base strategies on. It's also probable that the victims of nastier crimes, such as murder, would be less likely than average to respond.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looking for A2 Brockwell Park & Lido limited edition by the illustrator Peter Forsyth. Please let me know if you have any for sale!
    • Hey fellow cat owners! Was hoping that you would consider putting collars with bells on your outside cats? I’ve wee fledglings in a nest and at the moment I’m defending them against an orange and white dude (I call him Trump) and his nemesis, a lovely Tuxedo cat (I call Elon)… they are quite the double act in my back garden!!!! It would give the wee ones a bit of a better chance if a bell could announce their approach. And as a feline owner myself, I know cats will be cats, but every little helps even the odds. many thanks.
    • hallo, Do you have a suitcase for a student going to Ghana to teach sports? Taking a parachute, cones, mini hurdles, batons and dodge balls and a pump, then leaving it there for the school If I could have any old suitcase please it would be amazing! Thank you
    • Looking to borrow a gazebo for birthday party this Saturday, can you help? Julian - 07961463111
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...