Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ultimately we were quieter for the last few days simply because the wind is from the North East/East rather than from the West & so the Heathrow planes are not approaching to land via East London.


The lower stuff, which is relatively quiet, is from London City & has to stay under the Heathrow flightpath. Unfortunately, even when It's not being used. But they seems to come over ED whatever the wind is doing!


Agree about the noise though, noticing it got noticeably worse after 7/11 when the flight paths over London were changed leaving one of the main stacks to feed into the final approach right over us.

I'm in Berkshire, not ED, so at the other end of the flight paths. We get the noise, especially landings when the wind is easterly and they change the approach, starting about 4:40am. We close windows, and I sometimes use ear plugs, it doesn't prevent me waking up - they often go right over our house - it's loud and making me ill. We've been here for years and it didn't used to be this bad but I can't get BAA to admit anything has changed. We are affected by more flights and I'm sure they are flying lower. The EU limits are useless and their averaging is absurd it must have been designed for the airlines, not for people. We should be curtailing expansion AND reducing noise, for everyone. I wonder how many of the decision makers suffer from this, I think I know.
  • 2 weeks later...
i don't want to hear this! we are moving to ED from Oval, where the planes are so bloody noisy and constant and i wake every morning at 4:30, even with ear plugs. have also noticed the very late night ones lately, after 11pm. sounds like i am just moving a little further east along the same flight path(s). had hoped maybe we'd get lucky and get off the paths. :(

Might sound stupid but I've managed to deal with the plane issue for me.

I used to get really annoyed and would wake up at 4.30am and stay awake fuming.

I'd the impression that all the Heathrow planes were going over our house.

After complaining to Heathrow on their website, I got an excellent pack of information showing all the flight paths and where all the Heathrow flights go on their way in.


So after realising that all of South London (with the exception of Balham and Tooting it seems!!!) is plagued by flights going to Heathrow, I stopped getting worked up about it and don't notice them that often any more. And not getting worked up has meant that I ignore them at 4.30am.


I'm not saying it is great having flights over the house all the time, especially when we're in the garden and a noisy twin engine plane goes over but it's a lot easier to deal with since I stopped getting annoyed about it (particularly since there's nothing we can do about it!!!).


If you want more information about flights over S London, there's a flight tracker on the Heathrow website or just send an email complaint saying "why do all the planes go over my house" and you might feel easier about the whole thing.

From wikipedia


The aircraft was initially referred to in Britain as "Concorde," with the French spelling, but was officially changed to "Concord" by Harold Macmillan in response to a perceived slight by Charles de Gaulle. In 1967, at the French roll-out in Toulouse the British Government Minister for Technology, Tony Benn announced that he would change the spelling back to "Concorde."[7] This created a nationalist uproar that died down when Benn stated that the suffixed "e" represented "Excellence, England, Europe and Entente (Cordiale)." In his memoirs, he recounts a tale of a letter from an irate Scotsman claiming: "you talk about 'E' for England, but part of it is made in Scotland." Given Scotland's contribution of providing the nose cone for the aircraft, Benn replied "it was also 'E' for '?cosse' (the French name for Scotland) ? and I might have added 'e' for extravagance and 'e' for escalation as well!"

[quote name=So after realising that all of South London (with the exception of Balham and Tooting it seems!!!) is plagued by flights going to Heathrow' date=' I stopped getting worked up about it and don't notice them that often any more. And not getting worked up has meant that I ignore them at 4.30am.

]



does not being annoyed with the planes mean you slepp through them... I am always woken by them and have to get up and close all the window so I can get back to sleep...

pain in the arsse, I say

> closed threadRe: air traffic new

> Posted by: Miss Tipsy Topple Yesterday, 04:16PM


> I agree, just seen a bright red helicopter fly by my window, it looks as though it was landing in Peckham Rye.

> A helicopter (or what sounded like one) also woke me up in the early hours this morning.


That's most likely the air ambulance from the Royal London Hospital. See www.londonsairambulance.com


Ruth

  • 1 month later...

Have the flight paths around ED changed of late? Throughout July we've had a constant stream of jumbos looping over our house to join the main heathrow landing queue, which also seems much closer. Up to July, we mainly had the smaller and much less noisy City airport planes.


Is it permanent? Anyone know?

  • 8 months later...
I am loving it, especially the fact that small children do not wake up at 4.20 at the moment. I am amazed that the media coverage is all so negative, have not heard or read a single item about the benefits of there being a no fly zone. I know it is unrealistic to have it permanently, but having one Sunday a month flight free would be lovely.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would have thought Oru/ Trinco would be noisy… certainly is at mid afternoon. Do let us know when you have been what is was like and where you finally settled on.sure we are all interested  as your requirements are quite specific and good to know or have reviews on places, especially from you with different needs and requirements. Actually, given the numbers involved and as you say a special occasion, assuming £20/30  head, you really should have a chat with Suzanne. Maybe your kids could chip in a bit more as they are working.. You could always provide a cake yourself for after. Her food is special and well cooked.. know what you are getting..!    Italian place is also good as well and would cater for your needs except of  course the toilet aspect which is a steep climb down stairs… even I struggle. Yes, , know you are not a fan of Vietnamese place after tea incident… Owner now does all the cooking and so nice and accommodating but you won’t go there.. Wish she got more support… had a bereavement recently…       
    • Depends on your definition of idiot.  I use the term to describe someone of low intellectual capacity.  But understand that this is now not used as seen to be offensive. In that respect he makes decisions that are good for him, and his close followers.  Whether they are in the interests of the US that is open to debate (in the same way that history will debate all major leaders eg was Thatcher/Reagan good for the UK/US). On line definitions: An idiot is most commonly a term for a stupid, foolish, or senseless person, often used as an insult or to express frustration with someone's silly behavior, but historically it was a clinical term for profound intellectual disability, which is now considered offensive and obsolete. The word comes from Greek roots meaning a "private person" or layman, evolving to signify ignorance and lack of skill before becoming a derogatory label for low mental capacity.  Modern Usage Self-deprecation: Used to describe one's own silly mistakes ("I felt like an idiot when I tripped").  Insult/Exclamation: A very foolish person or someone acting stupidly ("Don't be such an idiot!").  Historical/Obsolete Meaning Medical Classification: Once a technical term for someone with extreme intellectual disability (IQ below 25), a usage now rejected as offensive.  Origin Greek (idiōtēs😞 A private citizen, layman, or someone lacking professional knowledge. Latin (idiota😞 An uneducated or ignorant person.  The notable recent  'idiot' was Johnson who of course played the fool (lovable rogue) but that served him well So ultimately not a good word as it can be used in many ways. Ignorant is another good example - can be stupid, unaware, or simply rude.
    • Are you still needing this?
    • I couldn’t disagree more - Trump is an idiot and he was voted for by a combination of idiots, racists and arrogance  you can complain about weak opponents all you like - but when the alternative is a “strong” thug then the problem is those who favour the thug.  All we face was predicted  - and he doesn’t have widespread support across many parts of America. So that leaves parts of America responsible for this  oh and in the list of things you call him you forgot the bit about being a p(that’s enough! Ed)  Vance might be worse in many ways - but he doesn’t have the “glam” that Trump has. Once Trump is exposed properly or dies, nowhere near as many people will vote for his successor see also his embarrassing fanboy: Farage 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...