Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ultimately we were quieter for the last few days simply because the wind is from the North East/East rather than from the West & so the Heathrow planes are not approaching to land via East London.


The lower stuff, which is relatively quiet, is from London City & has to stay under the Heathrow flightpath. Unfortunately, even when It's not being used. But they seems to come over ED whatever the wind is doing!


Agree about the noise though, noticing it got noticeably worse after 7/11 when the flight paths over London were changed leaving one of the main stacks to feed into the final approach right over us.

I'm in Berkshire, not ED, so at the other end of the flight paths. We get the noise, especially landings when the wind is easterly and they change the approach, starting about 4:40am. We close windows, and I sometimes use ear plugs, it doesn't prevent me waking up - they often go right over our house - it's loud and making me ill. We've been here for years and it didn't used to be this bad but I can't get BAA to admit anything has changed. We are affected by more flights and I'm sure they are flying lower. The EU limits are useless and their averaging is absurd it must have been designed for the airlines, not for people. We should be curtailing expansion AND reducing noise, for everyone. I wonder how many of the decision makers suffer from this, I think I know.
  • 2 weeks later...
i don't want to hear this! we are moving to ED from Oval, where the planes are so bloody noisy and constant and i wake every morning at 4:30, even with ear plugs. have also noticed the very late night ones lately, after 11pm. sounds like i am just moving a little further east along the same flight path(s). had hoped maybe we'd get lucky and get off the paths. :(

Might sound stupid but I've managed to deal with the plane issue for me.

I used to get really annoyed and would wake up at 4.30am and stay awake fuming.

I'd the impression that all the Heathrow planes were going over our house.

After complaining to Heathrow on their website, I got an excellent pack of information showing all the flight paths and where all the Heathrow flights go on their way in.


So after realising that all of South London (with the exception of Balham and Tooting it seems!!!) is plagued by flights going to Heathrow, I stopped getting worked up about it and don't notice them that often any more. And not getting worked up has meant that I ignore them at 4.30am.


I'm not saying it is great having flights over the house all the time, especially when we're in the garden and a noisy twin engine plane goes over but it's a lot easier to deal with since I stopped getting annoyed about it (particularly since there's nothing we can do about it!!!).


If you want more information about flights over S London, there's a flight tracker on the Heathrow website or just send an email complaint saying "why do all the planes go over my house" and you might feel easier about the whole thing.

From wikipedia


The aircraft was initially referred to in Britain as "Concorde," with the French spelling, but was officially changed to "Concord" by Harold Macmillan in response to a perceived slight by Charles de Gaulle. In 1967, at the French roll-out in Toulouse the British Government Minister for Technology, Tony Benn announced that he would change the spelling back to "Concorde."[7] This created a nationalist uproar that died down when Benn stated that the suffixed "e" represented "Excellence, England, Europe and Entente (Cordiale)." In his memoirs, he recounts a tale of a letter from an irate Scotsman claiming: "you talk about 'E' for England, but part of it is made in Scotland." Given Scotland's contribution of providing the nose cone for the aircraft, Benn replied "it was also 'E' for '?cosse' (the French name for Scotland) ? and I might have added 'e' for extravagance and 'e' for escalation as well!"

[quote name=So after realising that all of South London (with the exception of Balham and Tooting it seems!!!) is plagued by flights going to Heathrow' date=' I stopped getting worked up about it and don't notice them that often any more. And not getting worked up has meant that I ignore them at 4.30am.

]



does not being annoyed with the planes mean you slepp through them... I am always woken by them and have to get up and close all the window so I can get back to sleep...

pain in the arsse, I say

> closed threadRe: air traffic new

> Posted by: Miss Tipsy Topple Yesterday, 04:16PM


> I agree, just seen a bright red helicopter fly by my window, it looks as though it was landing in Peckham Rye.

> A helicopter (or what sounded like one) also woke me up in the early hours this morning.


That's most likely the air ambulance from the Royal London Hospital. See www.londonsairambulance.com


Ruth

  • 1 month later...

Have the flight paths around ED changed of late? Throughout July we've had a constant stream of jumbos looping over our house to join the main heathrow landing queue, which also seems much closer. Up to July, we mainly had the smaller and much less noisy City airport planes.


Is it permanent? Anyone know?

  • 8 months later...
I am loving it, especially the fact that small children do not wake up at 4.20 at the moment. I am amazed that the media coverage is all so negative, have not heard or read a single item about the benefits of there being a no fly zone. I know it is unrealistic to have it permanently, but having one Sunday a month flight free would be lovely.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
    • That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’.        Brexit happened Sue.  Boring graphs!  Calling Nigel Farage a plastic patriot is also very insulting seeing as he and the Reform Party have had a landslide victory all over England.
    • These charity collectors are often classed as chuggers.  It can be scandalous that the charity/admin may keep a huge percentage of your donations and a tiny percentage is  actually given to the charity.   I can not speak for individual collectors - but it common practice.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...