Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ultimately we were quieter for the last few days simply because the wind is from the North East/East rather than from the West & so the Heathrow planes are not approaching to land via East London.


The lower stuff, which is relatively quiet, is from London City & has to stay under the Heathrow flightpath. Unfortunately, even when It's not being used. But they seems to come over ED whatever the wind is doing!


Agree about the noise though, noticing it got noticeably worse after 7/11 when the flight paths over London were changed leaving one of the main stacks to feed into the final approach right over us.

I'm in Berkshire, not ED, so at the other end of the flight paths. We get the noise, especially landings when the wind is easterly and they change the approach, starting about 4:40am. We close windows, and I sometimes use ear plugs, it doesn't prevent me waking up - they often go right over our house - it's loud and making me ill. We've been here for years and it didn't used to be this bad but I can't get BAA to admit anything has changed. We are affected by more flights and I'm sure they are flying lower. The EU limits are useless and their averaging is absurd it must have been designed for the airlines, not for people. We should be curtailing expansion AND reducing noise, for everyone. I wonder how many of the decision makers suffer from this, I think I know.
  • 2 weeks later...
i don't want to hear this! we are moving to ED from Oval, where the planes are so bloody noisy and constant and i wake every morning at 4:30, even with ear plugs. have also noticed the very late night ones lately, after 11pm. sounds like i am just moving a little further east along the same flight path(s). had hoped maybe we'd get lucky and get off the paths. :(

Might sound stupid but I've managed to deal with the plane issue for me.

I used to get really annoyed and would wake up at 4.30am and stay awake fuming.

I'd the impression that all the Heathrow planes were going over our house.

After complaining to Heathrow on their website, I got an excellent pack of information showing all the flight paths and where all the Heathrow flights go on their way in.


So after realising that all of South London (with the exception of Balham and Tooting it seems!!!) is plagued by flights going to Heathrow, I stopped getting worked up about it and don't notice them that often any more. And not getting worked up has meant that I ignore them at 4.30am.


I'm not saying it is great having flights over the house all the time, especially when we're in the garden and a noisy twin engine plane goes over but it's a lot easier to deal with since I stopped getting annoyed about it (particularly since there's nothing we can do about it!!!).


If you want more information about flights over S London, there's a flight tracker on the Heathrow website or just send an email complaint saying "why do all the planes go over my house" and you might feel easier about the whole thing.

From wikipedia


The aircraft was initially referred to in Britain as "Concorde," with the French spelling, but was officially changed to "Concord" by Harold Macmillan in response to a perceived slight by Charles de Gaulle. In 1967, at the French roll-out in Toulouse the British Government Minister for Technology, Tony Benn announced that he would change the spelling back to "Concorde."[7] This created a nationalist uproar that died down when Benn stated that the suffixed "e" represented "Excellence, England, Europe and Entente (Cordiale)." In his memoirs, he recounts a tale of a letter from an irate Scotsman claiming: "you talk about 'E' for England, but part of it is made in Scotland." Given Scotland's contribution of providing the nose cone for the aircraft, Benn replied "it was also 'E' for '?cosse' (the French name for Scotland) ? and I might have added 'e' for extravagance and 'e' for escalation as well!"

[quote name=So after realising that all of South London (with the exception of Balham and Tooting it seems!!!) is plagued by flights going to Heathrow' date=' I stopped getting worked up about it and don't notice them that often any more. And not getting worked up has meant that I ignore them at 4.30am.

]



does not being annoyed with the planes mean you slepp through them... I am always woken by them and have to get up and close all the window so I can get back to sleep...

pain in the arsse, I say

> closed threadRe: air traffic new

> Posted by: Miss Tipsy Topple Yesterday, 04:16PM


> I agree, just seen a bright red helicopter fly by my window, it looks as though it was landing in Peckham Rye.

> A helicopter (or what sounded like one) also woke me up in the early hours this morning.


That's most likely the air ambulance from the Royal London Hospital. See www.londonsairambulance.com


Ruth

  • 1 month later...

Have the flight paths around ED changed of late? Throughout July we've had a constant stream of jumbos looping over our house to join the main heathrow landing queue, which also seems much closer. Up to July, we mainly had the smaller and much less noisy City airport planes.


Is it permanent? Anyone know?

  • 8 months later...
I am loving it, especially the fact that small children do not wake up at 4.20 at the moment. I am amazed that the media coverage is all so negative, have not heard or read a single item about the benefits of there being a no fly zone. I know it is unrealistic to have it permanently, but having one Sunday a month flight free would be lovely.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That explains why no-one was there when I went yesterday. Something else to complain about this evening then, and given that at least one adjacent ward is having their Labour Party branch AGM this evening (the one Renata Hamvas belongs to), may well be raised in passing conversation there😉 . 
    • Why do the street  tree people turn up on the day they are going to actually do  work on a tree, say they need to park their large  vehicle in three adjacent free car spaces, and then expect to be able to immediately find the owners of every nearby car??? And then if they do by luck manage to find one, expect them to move their car somewhere else even though every other space  in the road is taken? And even if that would  leave only one car space, which they can't actually use anyway because they can't find the owners of the other two cars parked next to it? Is it beyond the wit of the tree department to put a communication through the door of nearby houses a week (say)  in advance asking them to save three  spaces on the day?  And even providing cones to do so? I hate to think how much time must be wasted on this. And now, the tree people have come back on another day and seem to be managing to do the work anyway even though there are still no parking spaces near the tree 🙄 
    • Looks as if you are right https://jobs.honestburgers.co.uk/locations/dulwich  
    • GBK has gone next to Farmers, showing as permanently closed on Google maps. Could be one of the sites being replaced by an Honest Burgers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...