Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Saw a fight last night (Sat c.7.15) in Sainsbury's - group of Black youths were hanging around the front, looking for someone, then after I went in (with my toddler), they saw the guy they were looking for and set about him just past the security guard's station (a large group with dogs).


I have seen odd things in the park next to Sainsbury's, and my wife has seen trouble before at the Sainsbury's entrance.


Does anyone know the basis for this? It seems a recurring problem?


And does anyone know why the small park remains unlit at night-time even though the gates are open and many people use it as a shortcut after dark?


Best


Zaardvark

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3859-fight-in-sainsburys-dkh-lounged/
Share on other sites

apparently sainsbury's is a hotbed of nastiness at the moment...

recent handbag snatchings from "right under the woman's nose"

and also an accident involving a child and a trolley.


i was encouraged today to be "vigilant" whilst shopping there

(by a staff member).


you certainly don't hear about these sorts of things happening at iceland.

Hi,

Skin colour was reported to decribe the youths, not for any other reasons, as MitchK pointed out. Indeed I thought that reporting this might be a good reason and generating the reason for a group of us to talk with the manager of Sainsbury's to encourage him/her to beef up the security - ban dogs from the general area and put a kiosk or similar in the park that is open along with lighting.


Best


Zaardvark

What has their skin colour got to do with it?


Trust someone to play the race card. The skin colour was a description. Would anyone have protested if you'd said a gang of white guys? I doubt it. FFS.


Anyway, this Sainsburys is the most lucrative in the country. It makes more money than any of the others. Rich pickings for unsavoury types who want to rob someone I'd have thought. I'll stick to Morrisons.

NatashaD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would anyone have protested if you'd said a gang of white guys? I doubt it. FFS.

>

xxxxxxxxxx


Not very likely anyone would have mentioned their skin colour if they'd all been white, is it, NatashaD. That's the point. FFS


:-S

It seems to be offensive to someone, no matter how the description is written:-S


Surely a hurried description is better than none:(


Perhaps you should patronise a black forum Sue, as you are forever pulling the race card.


Why wouldn't people use an all white description anyway, I would.FFS

jesus, enough. there were a gang of intimidating kids and the person chose to describe them. before wading in with an argument about whether this person was right or wrong for what they saw or, before it's decided that it's this or that to state colour of what they saw or, whether you chose to trust them and their views you can check their previous posts to see what kind of opinions that person has previously expressed.


in this case zaardvark seems a well balanced poster who maybe wanted to let people know what they witnessed and if anyone knew what happened. they have also highlighted a very important issue that everyone seems to be ignoring and that is when is the park going to be properly lit?

taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was verbally abused in Sainsbury's car park

> once: by a smug middle class couple who thought

> I'd taken a child parking spot. Imagine the

> trembling joy when mother and child returned to

> the car, killing dead their self-righteous rant.

> Be careful out there.

...My answer is that I DO have a child(I don't btw) he/she just happens not to be with me on this particular occassion:))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
    • Rather than have a go at Southwark,  contact them, they will employ at least one arborist who will know far more than most people on this site. Here's one: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shaun-murphy-morris-03b7b665/?originalSubdomain=uk
    • I would look in the surrounding area as once they realise it has nothing they could sell or of obvious monatary value in it they'll dump the bag and contents.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...