Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Am asking a query on behalf of a friend. She received a letter at the end of September informing her that a very small (maybe 3/4 space) car park was going to be re tarmaced in 7 days. This 'car park' is permit only and serves a couple of hundred properties. No one especially uses it as all the local streets, including right outside her house, are free parking. Then she got a letter dated 3 days earlier informing her that there will be 'a moderate increase to your service charge to reflect this work' but 'I am unable to confirm what the increase to your bill will be at this time'. Is this allowed???? Is there any way to challenge it realistically or does she just have to pay whatever they demand without having any opportunity to challenge the works??

sunshine sky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this allowed????


Up to a point. In general a landlord would be allowed to make an estimate at the start of the year and then adjust afterwards. However, if the value of the job was over ?250 per resident charged, they would be required to carry out separate consultation. As this doesn't always happen then in practice, as not all repairs are planned that far in advance, the repair recharge for that particular job would be capped at ?250 per resident.


> Is there any way to

> challenge it realistically or does she just have

> to pay whatever they demand without having any

> opportunity to challenge the works??


If the works haven't started yet she can demand to see surveys, quotes, estimates etc. It's where the works have already begun that you get problems!


Its also a good idea to get the name of the person in charge of the actual work ASAP and contact them. In my experience the person dealing with the actual bill will be helpful and possibly sympathetic but they have no say in what gets spent. Better to speak to the works manager and if she is very concerned about the projected cost then it can do no harm to copy a ward councillor in.

  • 1 month later...

So, Southwark Council's comedy cowboy builders are still active and creating havoc. Recently one morning, a scaffolder turned up at my flat, which unfortunately has Southwark as a freeholder, to my despair. It was only luck that I was in, so was able to turf him off, otherwise I'd have come back from work to find scaffolding put up - for no reason. I was not due for major works, and this was confirmed by the council, despite the scaffolder insisting he had the right address. No doubt I will be charged by these scaffolders for the 'work' in my next bill, as I always am for bogus jobs, which I will fight and win, yet again.


And not only that, several of my poor neighbours who were scheduled for major works are now complaining that their windows have been painted shut! They're unable to open them - just as previous posters have mentioned in other areas in East Dulwich. You could not make this up! What kind of painter paints windows shut?! Is Mears recruiting people off the streets? And where are Southwark's managers of works overseeing all this? Southwark Council housing department is not fit for purpose and a major investigation needs to be instigated.

fredbear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is worth a listen "You and Yours" Radio 4

> Friday 6th nov about Southwark and the problem of

> Major works of two people



thanks for the tip, fredbear, I just rang You & yours, spoke to a producer who has sent me the links tot he programme and another similar story about leaseholder issues. If anyone wants me to share this with them I can

  • 2 weeks later...

exactly the same happened to us, we told them that they must have the wrong house so they said that they will return later on once we have spoken to a council but 2-3 weeks no response form council, the person who is dealing with it is not even responding to any of our calls or voicemails and no sign of scaffolders either. It is a joke as the works are estimated to cost over 3k which is not cheap!!!


Anywhere else when you spend 3k or over would provide you with at least some sort of a good customer service but no... Southwark council do not, they just expect you to pay and pay quickly and if you question it or just make general enquiries they charge you extra for delays and are unresponsive and just ignore you! They are an absolute joke!!

just managed to get back the cost of scaffolding that was supposed to have been used for a minor repair.Because we could prove that the contractors did not use scaffolding we got our money back.If there had been tenants in both flats no one would have known and southwark would have just paid the bill because they do not check what has been done
yes that is correct... in my last property on Ivanhoe Road council had a scaffolding on the house next door for almost a year, it was just sitting there and nothing was done... us as a leaseholders were most likely paying for this in and in our service charges it most likely noted as " street repair" or " block repairs" ....they only took it down because we were complaining and James had to get involved!!

fredbear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> just managed to get back the cost of scaffolding

> that was supposed to have been used for a minor

> repair.Because we could prove that the contractors

> did not use scaffolding we got our money back.If

> there had been tenants in both flats no one would

> have known and southwark would have just paid the

> bill because they do not check what has been done


Is this fraud that needs to be reported to the police?


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...