Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the advice.... What is LVT?


Now got the responsive repairs summary and there are two charges for ?521.83 marked as high performance back door?? My property does not have a back door and the flat downstairs has not had a door replaced. Then there is a charge of 196.58 for reglaze? And lastly ?212.58 for annual repairs overhead allocation to the block but no repairs were untaken.


Can anyone advise how I challenge this?


Thanks M

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I haven't read through all the pages here but just

> wanted to say that I took Southwark to the LVT

> over service charges and now pay none.

> The council fought me all the way and were

> incredibly obstructive and as a result it was a

> tedious and time consuming process but for me had

> a good outcome.

> during the process all sorts of ridiculous charges

> that the council couldn't back up at all were

> discovered so it is worth keeping on it and

> insisting for clarity and information - not

> something they were willing to give..


Was it because you were a freeholder? not on any estate but a street property.

MirandaS Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for the advice.... What is LVT?

>

> Now got the responsive repairs summary and there

> are two charges for ?521.83 marked as high

> performance back door?? My property does not have

> a back door and the flat downstairs has not had a

> door replaced. Then there is a charge of 196.58

> for reglaze? And lastly ?212.58 for annual repairs

> overhead allocation to the block but no repairs

> were untaken.

>

> Can anyone advise how I challenge this?

>

> Thanks M


First put in a stage one compliant to the council


Second. Get your Cllr and Local MP to put in a members equiry.


Copy all correspondence to eleanor kelly and peter.john @southwark.gov.uk


They should be able to get the ball rolling before you think of the LVT. Not called the LVT but another body, easy to look up.


They will probably threaten you with speaking with your mortgage lender if they do just tell them and instruct them not to pay as there is a dispute.

MirandaS Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for the advice.... What is LVT?

>

> Now got the responsive repairs summary and there

> are two charges for ?521.83 marked as high

> performance back door?? My property does not have

> a back door and the flat downstairs has not had a

> door replaced. Then there is a charge of 196.58

> for reglaze? And lastly ?212.58 for annual repairs

> overhead allocation to the block but no repairs

> were untaken.

>

> Can anyone advise how I challenge this?

>

> Thanks M


Report it to the police.


John K

Thanks for the advice Charles. Found my local council who has a surgery this Thursday so will go and see her. Emailed the Southwark team for a further explanation of the charges but no response. Right in the processing of remortgaging and need to declare any arrears so may need to have to pay and then fight to get the money back!!!

Thanks again for all your helpful advice.

we are having the same problem MirandaS.I started this thread some time ago because of problems we have had with service charges in the past, this time its for window handle repaires in the downstairs tenents flat and to pay for scaffolding to repair the roof they did not use scaffolding.We are also having to complain about major repairs that are taking place.

@ Charles Notice.

I'm a lease holder and it is a 'street property' that the council insisted was an 'estate property'. I am aware it is a different case from the usual however the point was more about the process of tribunal and the obstructiveness of the council during that process and that it uncovered quite a bit of mis-management that I'm sure could be extrapolated to other Southwark properties.

  • 3 weeks later...

Asset Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I haven't read through all the pages here but just

> wanted to say that I took Southwark to the LVT

> over service charges and now pay none.

> The council fought me all the way and were

> incredibly obstructive and as a result it was a

> tedious and time consuming process but for me had

> a good outcome.

> during the process all sorts of ridiculous charges

> that the council couldn't back up at all were

> discovered so it is worth keeping on it and

> insisting for clarity and information - not

> something they were willing to give..



Hi there Asset,

I'm currently preparing a case against Southwark council regarding exorbitant service charges. Could you please tell me more about your experience with the LVT when you took the council there?

maybe some do's and don'ts. Did you represent yourself or did you use the services of a solicitor?



Many thanks,

Hi


I am now in this situation as well. I have asked for clarification of the items being charged as 'responsive repairs'. The itemised bill stated that they repaired a door on two separate occasions at the cost of ?600 each time however in N email from the council, an officer stated it was to replace a door to which I challenged. This person then sent it on for another officer to review, she stated the cost related to changing of locks whilst the property was void- ?600 per lock?. I have sent a further please explain email and waiting to hear.


I too would like to know more about your experience, Asset.


Many thanks M

Hi,


I have a file about a foot thick....

I'll try and keep it brief.


I represented myself. I had engaged a solicitor initially but after the first few letters it became clear the council would not back down and wanted to go all the way so I had deal with it myself as I couldn't afford the legal fees.


The whole situation was ridiculous. When I bought the property my solicitor questioned service charges in the lease and we had a letter from Southwark Council confirming no service charge was payable on the property. For the first several years we weren't charged any and then out of the blue I began to receive invoices for service charge. I queried the charges and never paid them and kept on maintaining no service charge was payable and the sums built up until it was a couple of thousand.

Eventually they slapped a county court demand on me so I counter claimed for stress and harassment etc and wrote up my case blah blah and said I wanted the case directed to the LVT and the court ordered it to go to there (thankfully).


My main argument was my property was an individual street property and not part of an estate and therefore had no shared space for which I could be accountable so this is quite different to charges relating to estate repairs however my experience showed the complete incompetence of Southwark council's leasehold management department.


The LVT does provide clear information on the information required and the steps necessary for the procedure so that is helpful.

Prior to the hearing you have to gather all the documentary evidence possible - this meant the council had to provide itemised information on the charges being brought to me - seriously, there were charges for sewage works on there that the council had no idea where actually the works had taken place, there were charges relating to repairs on houses at the other end of the road - I repeat I am a street property not an estate property but even if it was an estate you would query having to pay towards repairs on individual dwellings, service charge is only supposed to cover costs relating to shared space.

I also had charges for maintaining a piece of green space at the other end of the road - now if I lived next to it and received some benefit I wouldn't have minded contributing to the minimal costs for maintaining it but the LVT agreed that as it was so far away no costs could be apportioned to my property.


I'm not sure what else I can say, before going to the LVT you have to get Southwark to give you all the information relating to charges. I found in my case I was getting invoices that had a non-specific figure for repairs and maintenance and it took me quite some time to get them actually to provide the itemised information necessary for me to challenge them.


As highlighted in MirandaS's case above there is a lot of misinformation floating around and the LVT has to decide what is fair and reasonable.


I had people from the panel coming to inspect the property and the surrounding area and it was at times quite an intimidating process but for me had a good outcome.


It annoys me that someone else would just have rolled over and paid these charges quite unnecessarily and would still be paying unfair charges now had I not gone through the process.


So basically, if you've got the time and strength to go through the process it is worth it probably.

That's brilliant Asset.

a true David vs Goliath tale.

An inspiring one too. I really admire people who will stand for what they believe is true.

It must have been a difficult episode for you at the time.

Thank you for taking the time to share it with us.

Assest's experience at the LVT (now the First Tier Tribunal) has inspired me.

I wonder if there are many members on this board who have gone to the LVT in the past and would be willing to share their own experience: give useful tips, pointers, do's and don'ts, practical advice, etc...

Perhaps the topic of a new thread? Any title suggestions?

m

Just a reminder that the council are hosting a leaseholder/freeholder meeting on the 28th by London Bridge and I would URGE each and everyone of you having problems with service charges/major works to go. We are alot stronger united so the more of us that come together and question/dispute these cowboy bills the better.

A possible route for communication with the Council is through your local TRA - Tenants and Residents' Association. These are "Recognised" by the Council to represent Council tenants and leaseholders.


BARA, the Barry Area Residents' Association, directly represents the area bounded by Friern Road, Lordship Lane, Crystal Palace Road and Upland Road. but membership is open to any Southwark residents. Many historic local TRA's have faded away over time, and the surviving ones are mostly Estate based. Estates of course include leaseholders, but BARA is probably the only remaining TRA representing an area almost entirely of street properties. About one fifth of all the residents in the BARA area are Council tenants or leaseholders


BARA does not have a team of experts to directly respond to these issues. The experts are the individual leaseholders, such as those who have contributed to this thread on the Forum. But it can offer a forum to explore the issues and develop collective strategies and it can provide an official route of communication with the Council.


BARA meets on the second Tuesday of the month at the East Dulwich Community Centre in Darrell Road. That's tomorrow night Tuesday 10th November at 8pm.


MarkT

  • 3 weeks later...

I went to the homeowners seminar at PWC today and left with a wealth of knowledge and confidence knowing that if this ever happens to me any time soon, then I will know how to deal with the Cowboys at Southwark council. The event started at 11:30am and finished around 4:30pm but didn't mind as I sat through aspirational stories of fellow leaseholders challenging the council over major works bills and service charges and winning.

I urge EVERYONE who is a Southwark leaseholder to find out about these events and come to the next one. It was my first and certainly not my last!

We were charged for an item that was not used in our last service charge and have got this removed over ?400.If there had been two council tenents in the property instead of one and us this would have gone through without any check by Southwark.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The voters in these redwall seats all complain of a broken Britain etc etc - yet see no connection between the  country voting tory for 14 years and those towns voting for Brexit despite being warned it would lead to problems - they just moan about everything - often quite correctly (services are expensive or being cut, roads are a state, housing is expensive etc etc) but when you ask them when things were better.. well the answer is either    a) under a labour government when we part of the EU or b) some fictional Facebook sepia tinted picture of Britain "when you could leave your front door open, we didn't know how lucky we were" Voters say they want the truth but when someone sane (if dull and sometimes wrong) gets into power and says "lads, things are worse than we realised" they bleat about a lack of instant fixes and say it's wrong to keep blaming the last government (despite the lie about Labour crashing the economy in 2008 STILL being a stick labour get beaten with in 2025) as for rejoining the EU - the barriers are immense - you have a press and a large portion of teh population that will behave just abysmally. You have an electorate that recognises the mistake but is all very English and "made out beds, mustn't grumble" etc etc - no backbone. And you have an opposition party (or two) that is plain bonkers and when labour do lose power they would renege/reverse any progress made in matters EU in seconds Meanwhile EU countries can see all this clearly and have no incentive to engage until this country grows up and is able to demonstrate they won't act hysterically when reintegration starts
    • This is an extract from an edition with Dave Walker, mediator extraordinaire, born at the Elephant & Castle and still living in Southwark. One of his great achievements is training young people to be peer mediators ... who even step in to work with disputing adults! Just shows what can be achieved and who can achieve it. Pretty much anyone and everyone.  Next week we publish a special edition with Jo Berry who has very powerful story to tell. Further more, there was an invited audience of local people young and old, with whom she engaged in open discussion for an hour. Insights galore!
    • Yes, given the clear (and predictable) failure of Brexit, all the negative effects, and the overwhelming proportion of people agreeing that it has failed, I really can't understand why Labour have gone down the "making it work" road. But then I have no idea of what reversing some or all of it might involve. Also, Reform don't mention Brexit much, do they? If at all.  They push other aspects of what they say they stand for. So the people inclined to vote for them have probably completely forgotten they were ever associated with Brexit.
    • Latest news from the sunlit uplands, on the same day the UK economy 'unexpectedly' shrank 0.1%... As an aside, the cognitive dissonance shown by large parts of the UK electorate over Brexit is quite a thing to behold. I don't think it's controversial to say that Brexit is now considered by a large % of the population to have failed, with the % who see it as a success in single figures. Yet, initial polling for the upcoming Runcorn by-election shows Reform winning what is a relatively safe Labour seat. Now I get protest votes and all that, but Reform were literally the Brexit Party before the rebrand. If there's such a large consensus that Brexit failed, why would so many even consider voting for a party that actively helped deliver Brexit and all the known economic damage it would cause? And that's before you even get to the fantasy economics it presented at the last General Election. Labour haven't helped themselves either, by pursuing a nonsensical 'We can make Brexit work' approach, they have in effect made themselves impotent when it comes to attacking Reform and what they stand for...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...