Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Actually the French appreciate people trying to use their language even if they can speak English. Who said one story is a reflection of the English race? The more you write and the less you read seems to actually to reflect on you being arrogant.


Who said your thuggish football fans are a reflection of the race as a whole? The fact is that even if they are not, they are preceived as such.


You specialise is two expressions: 'can't accept' and lazy pop'. Perhaps you could try being witty or original. One will do.

Bajesus! Its kicked off on here today,to be sure!(?)

Perhaps tomorrow we will all adjourn to Sauchiehall Street and take up residence and have a pop at the natives...I have the distinct belief that they might be a little,er,restlessB)

Don't get me wrong there ARE some English folk(misguided arrogant fools say I) who might think it a little rich being castigated(poetic licenceB)) by a group of people who are guests in their house but not I.I think its all part of lifes rich tapestry myself:)-D

I love this kind of petty nonsense Declan, it's kind of housing estate yob isn't it?


'English race'? I wasn't aware that there was one.


*Makes note to self, must pursue racial purity as social strategy*


'Perception is reality'? Oooooh, goodie.


*Makes note to self, use stereotyping as a weapon*


'History as justification'? Plenty of giggles with this one.


*Makes note to self, visit sins of fathers upon the sons*


Mix those little jugs of glee together and waddaya get.... ooh, I don't know Declan, use your imagination ;-)

I will say this however:


Irish television coverage of football is miles ahead of the sycophantic drivel on UK TV. That isn't anything to do with anything - it just is a current fact. It could all swap over in a few years. Except I've been waiting decades


Oh and it does bug me when successful athletes are British and unsuccesful ones are Welsh/Scottish etc..

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Perhaps tomorrow we will all adjourn to

> Sauchiehall Street and take up residence and have

> a pop at the natives...


EDF is hardly Sauchiehall Street... though I was in Piccadilly Circus waiting for a friend a few years ago, minding my own business, when a young man swaggered up to me and started banging on about how he hated the English because he was Welsh blah blah.


Before I had a chance to respond, an enormous shaven-headed Ingerlaaand caricature of a bloke tapped him on the shoulder (obviously having overheard the Welsh nationalist ranting) and said to him, "Yeah, but you are BRITISH, aren't you?"


It was a joy to watch the piss and vinegar evaporate from my new Welsh friend. I left them to discuss the matter.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Eamonn Dunphy on a rant

DO NOT EVER,EVER mention that No-Good,useless,pussyfaced,gutless Bustard...filthy,evil piece of human excrement...

He missed a Penalty for Millwall against Bury in 1968 and I still haven't forgiven the horrible...(6)(6)(6)

....Not that I'm one to bear a grudge...lifes far too short...

Oh there you are you slimey greasy Portugese good for nothing pric*! That's what I would say if I was to belittle myself. Obviously I wouldn't want to do that. However it is about time you showed your face. You started the thread or don't you remember?

Just thinking about what you said earlier Declan. You said that the title of this thread is blatantly offensive (or some thing similar). I have to disagree with you there. If you look at the phraseology used it is quite blatantly tongue in cheek. Especially the use of the words hostile (over the top) and looking (a little silly in this context).


Now if the title was something like, I hate the French who?s with me or What?s the difference between a Frenchman and a Belgian I would agree with you. But I can?t see anything serious in, I feel hostile towards French looking people today, followed by And normally I only feel this way about pigeons.

Oh and the whole the Irish have the right to hate the British thing, I've been saying in Ireland that this is just daft, British rulers were every bit as cruel to their own subjects (should we hate the French because those damn Plantaganets massacred Wat Tyler and his troop of good English men? - don't be silly).


Those with power just happen to be bastards to those without, not just to foreigners, and then I read this wonderful article in the Irish independent.


"more perverse was the general attitude that saw Ireland as being oppressed for centuries by the British, and especially by the English.


In this context we see how language is abused: for "Britain" you should read "Britain's power elite". Innocent people grew up with the concept of one nation persecuting the other. Of course this is absurd.


The seas between our two islands are not boundaries -- they are roads. For centuries there has been great coming and going between the two islands. The sweet music of the Gaelic language was heard in London in Shakespeare's time. Most of Wellington's army at the Battle of Waterloo were Southern Irish. It is said that after Gallipoli there was a crepe in every second house in the Coombe. I'm merely trying to say that these two islands have long been bound together. The British power elite abused their own common people just as much as they abused us. The eviction of the Highland Scots was an example of a people being cruel to their own.


We will come nearer home: even in the worst times of the bombing in England by our "Freedom Fighters", there was no significant backlash. This proved, if proof were needed, that George Orwell was right when he always claimed that the English were essentially a decent people."

Mostly good stuff Piers - but again, I don't think it was Britain's in-power elite who posted the


"No blacks No dogs No Irish" signs in B&B's across the land in teh 50's 60's and 70's


Not that the Irish are behaving any better now they have a few coppers mind you....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...