Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And yet several people who dont use that petrol station have also been cloned


I agree that the circumstantial evidence weighs against it. . But given that there are pages of people warning against using the machine there and yet people continue to do so i begin to wonder what the point is

Dont fall for the Banking industry lies - its their responsibility to sort this out - its not your money - their systems COULD be secure, but they chose to take the cheaper security options in order to maximise their credit card division profits - this is what happens when greed takes over sense


masters of their own problems - their huge profits were generated on the back of easy credit , like the billions of cards that they pumped out for decades and made money hand over fist.Obviously now they are a bit concerend, as they few % they built into their numbers for fraud write downs once seemed a small price to pay, it is now a serious issue as they scramble for liquidity and survival.


Dont blame the garage or its workers, thatsn not on

Well yes... the banks could use biometric devices or something, but they choose not to... but I'm sure that people would still find a way to crack the technology (although it would be harder to do).


But I don't see how they are more to blame than those who steal the money.


It's like having your car stolen, and blaming the car manufacturer for not making the car more secure.

penk Wrote:


> That would be moderately newsworthy, no?

>

> Funny how I can't find even a suggestion that that

> occurred, apart from on here.



I emailed customer support at Somerfield (as I said I would) and got nothing back. No surprise there. So I wrote to their Chief Exec saying that I understood that staff had been removed because of card cloning. Here's the response I received...

  • 1 year later...

Jeremy wrote on 25 February, 2009

-------------------------------------------------------

> for me the weight of circumstantial evidence against the petrol station over the

> last couple of years is too much to ignore.


Another conviction today, not the first, of people involved in petrol station card fraud. In this case they compromised the Pin Entry Devices to get card data, and then cloned cards for use principally in ATMs abroad. R4 You and Yours (in ?last ten minutes) reported on it, but it'll be in all the papers. Principal fraudster a 29 year old Sri Lankan software engineering graduate allegedly called Theogones De Montford.


It sounds all too easy to do, with the right expertise, in places where management is lax and possibly unsupervised access is easy.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


R4 You and Yours (in

> ?last ten minutes) reported on it, but it'll be in

> all the papers.


It has been in the papers already...


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1288492/Credit-card-fraudster-hits-35-000-motorists-petrol-station-scam.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

There's a little pice of kit called a key logger. It looks a bit like an adapter for the end of a computer cable. What it does is store all the data transfered through it and can be attached to any card reader or computer in any shop, restaurant etc. That data on that logger contains all your card details and pin etc and then the criminal makes a cloned card with the same data on it and they are off and away. It's actually very easy to do. And encryting data doesn't make any difference as there is software that can decrypt data at high speed. Basically unless you trust the establishment swiping your card, pay in cash.

cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > How did he get access to the machines? Did he

> get

> > jobs at all the garages??

>

>

> I looked at the article and it isn't clear.

> Assume he must have befriended managers.


xxxxxxx


That's quite worrying if there's so many managers who would go along with this :-S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Jellybeanz Food poisioning can take 4 hours or so for the symptoms to become apparent. you mention and I quote  "This incident was most defintely the ice-cream or the person serving it having dirty hands or gloves" I think that is a sweeping assumption again pointing blame at the cafe. Kids and adults can be violently sick out of the blue for any number of reasons..I've had situations where I have eaten the same as my partner prepared in our own home and then been sick once only-he was ok and after I'd been sick I felt fine. I feel you're very quick to point the finger at a local establishment frequented by many with a good hygene rating. To mention the other thread where you slated a local buisness because you and your child disliked their vegan hot chocolate (or something like that...)..It was'nt to you or your childs taste-fine don't blame the establishment. I'm fussy about coffee and matcha latte some places do coffee I enjoy and ditto Matcha latte-I would not post on a public forum that XXXX's matcha is rubbish because someone else may favour it. one mans meat is another mans poison as they say and my personal taste does not give me good reason to slate a local buisness (except in the case of a certain chain 'on the lordship' which is frankly all round pretty meh.  
    • I think we can agree trees are fantastic, beautiful and a welcome part of our environment... the issue occurs as Nigello stated above when they aren't cared for or pruned regularly. When they cause damage to payments and property that isn't right, and unfortunately as trees mature - particularly some varieties - they show that it really isn't practical for them to be planted in close proximity to properties. 
    • Sadly I think, apart from more dog poo bins, the only things that would  deter these selfish people from not cleaning up after their dogs is more CCTV and very large fines. But that is not going to happen, is it?  Too expensive to run, and problems with identifying the owners/dog walkers concerned. Didn't there used to be (grammar) dog licenses? Why were they stopped? Maybe people should have to pass a dog owning test, a bit like taking a driving test.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...