Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No-flies Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Mick Mac ? we would just like to clarify what we

> mean when we say we are an ?online agent?. We do

> not have a high street office and it is in that

> sense that we are online. Some ?online agents?

> list your property on Rightmove/Zoopla, etc and

> then leave the rest of the process to you. We are

> not an ?online agent? in that sense. We provide a

> full service, including valuation, marketing,

> accompanied viewings, feedback and sales

> progression after an offer is accepted. Anybody

> using us will notice no difference from using a

> high street agent (whether in terms of generating

> competitive tension amongst buyers or otherwise)

> except that they will be dealing with grown ups

> (who have bought and sold their own homes on a

> number of occasions so understand the possible

> frustrations), getting better service standards

> and lower fees.

>


So you are an Estate Agent without a shop. The OP said you were an online only estate agent, hence the confusion.


I have bought and sold houses before without ever having been to an estate agent's shop.


Maybe you should call yourselves "No Shops" instead of "No Flies" ;)


Given the additonal info I cant see that you are much different from a normal estate agent excpet that you are significantly cheaper. Good luck!

katanita Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can vouch for No-Flies, they are friends of mine.

> Haven't bought or sold through them


I don't think you've got the hang of this, katanita. It should go something like:


"Having tried many of the established estate agencies in East Dulwich, I was left feeling crushed and devalued. Finally I found No Flies agency - they were like a breath of fresh air, and they really valued me as a client and as a person."

Dammmmmnn. You're quite right. And I should be using this post to get all defensive about my true identity as one of the directors of No Flies and accuse everyone of pursuing personal vendettas.


I'll get it right next time, promise, and remember to add the requisite telltale spelling mistakes and bizarre punctuation.


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katanita Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can vouch for No-Flies, they are friends of

> mine.

> > Haven't bought or sold through them

>

> I don't think you've got the hang of this,

> katanita. It should go something like:

>

> "Having tried many of the established estate

> agencies in East Dulwich, I was left feeling

> crushed and devalued. Finally I found No Flies

> agency - they were like a breath of fresh air, and

> they really valued me as a client and as a

> person."

If I were ever to sell-up there would be nobody in the running except for Brendan. I thought "estate agent with integrity" was an oxymoron before meeting him. If you search for "No Flies" on the EDF then you will find plenty of recommendations from satisfied customers and I predict many more to come. Yes, they face challenges in the future but who doesn't.


Px

A good idea. Although I'm very familiar with that classic thread already. Amazing.


El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katanita, we probably need a crib sheet page of

> forum in jokes.....

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,279511,279511#msg-279511

Oh. No, I thought I was just continuing the joke!


El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> my bad, I thought you were being snippy, not

> getting in the spirit of things :)

>

> knee jerk reaction to 7 years of overly sensitive

> folk with green ink!!! (cripes has it been that

> long!?!?!)

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm with you there Michael. Snorky, Moos,

> CitizenED, ratty, Keef (whoever he was),

> woofmarkthedog (who she?). Oh, and erm, Mikecg

> and Hal9000.



Matthew123 as well. As for Mikecg, i thought he was gone long before that.

mcg was an oddbod. actually a nice enough fella who could contribute to a debate, but a short fuse, terrible bass youtube uploads, and some very big shoulder-based chips were his undoing.



...that and the concerted campaign enlisting hackers to break the forum with DoS attacks and the like....

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> As for Mikecg, i thought he

> > was gone long before that.

>

>

> He was around in March 2009, received a PM from

> him...


Ah - I knew he had one friend.

  • 2 weeks later...

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds like my suspicions were unfounded, so my

> apologies to jbodey for doubting you.

>

> Out of interest, what is the commission that

> No-Flies charge? (awful name, IMHO)


They are advertising on the forum on the left-hand side banner, the name makes more sense - very clever. I've only ever heard good things about them too and I think they way they respond to queries on the forum is excellent.

Sadly, I'm old enough to remember when Virgin Records first opened for business (70s). That seemed like an outrageous name at the time but these days nobody bats an eyelid at an odd moniker (Orange, Apple, O2, Smeg, R Soles, Yahoo, Google, Flickr). Odd.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I saw this house a few doors down from me with

> pieces of wood all over the door and window which

> had the word 'infected' on each of them. Is it a

> new estate agent?



No, that is street art.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...