Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I see what you're getting at now, jrussel.


If I may present my own parallel experience:


The other day I had a disagreement with an orange, who I accused of behaving exactly like Celine Dion. I understand that there are differences between oranges and Celine Dion (geographical origin, accents, cruel thin nose etc) but in the context of our disagreement - first and foremost - and without (herewith) no further ado, I, er..


And other nonsensical made-up stuff.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see what you're getting at now, jrussel.

>

> If I may present my own parallel experience:

>

> The other day I had a disagreement with an orange,

> who I accused of behaving exactly like Celine

> Dion. I understand that there are differences

> between oranges and Celine Dion (geographical

> origin, accents, cruel thin nose etc) but in the

> context of our disagreement - first and foremost -

> and without (herewith) no further ado, I, er..

>

> And other nonsensical made-up stuff.



You need to try a bit harder with your analogy. To start with, you need to explain the context of your disagreement. Otherwise I cannot comment and you are really just wasting everyone's time.

What's the context of your disagreement Dogster?


I'm assuming it's one of the following:

(a) Can't tell the difference in accent

(b) Think everyone who is doing 'something' (unspecified) is Ozzie

© Think that everyone in the world is a figment of your imagination and you can label them as you wish without redress


If (a) then there's no need to tell people they have no identity, just tell them you can't differentiate their accent.

If (b) then as per your request to Bob, please tell us what that 'something' is, and we'll try and help.

If © then see a psychologist as you have no friends to help you.


I suspect the underlying problem is ©, but it's exacerbated by (a), and that you're pretending it's (b) because that means you can blame everyone else.

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You need to try a bit harder with your analogy. To

> start with, you need to explain the context of

> your disagreement. Otherwise I cannot comment and

> you are really just wasting everyone's time.


I shall expand.


I don't like oranges (excluding Satsumas & Clementines), as I find them difficult to peel and they make my fingers all sticky.

I don't like Celine Dion, as she is difficult to peel and makes my fingers all sticky.

So, whilst I am happy to recognise that there are differences between Celine Dion and oranges, in the context of how they both make me feel - ie angry - there are no differences between Celine Dion and oranges (excluding Satsumas & Clementines)


I hope this is now clear enough for you.

Yes, it would seem to be true, on the basis of the information given, to say that in the context of how they make you feel, there is no difference between the orange and Celine Dion.


So? What is your point?


*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jrussel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You need to try a bit harder with your analogy.

> To

> > start with, you need to explain the context of

> > your disagreement. Otherwise I cannot comment

> and

> > you are really just wasting everyone's time.

>

> I shall expand.

>

> I don't like oranges (excluding Satsumas &

> Clementines), as I find them difficult to peel and

> they make my fingers all sticky.

> I don't like Celine Dion, as she is difficult to

> peel and makes my fingers all sticky.

> So, whilst I am happy to recognise that there are

> differences between Celine Dion and oranges, in

> the context of how they both make me feel - ie

> angry - there are no differences between Celine

> Dion and oranges (excluding Satsumas &

> Clementines)

>

> I hope this is now clear enough for you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know whether any local pharmacies are providing both flu and Covid jabs this year? If so, can you have them at the same time?
    • Hard to tell, because people arrived and left at various times! Not a huge crowd, but more than were at the first two (this was the third). Probably around a dozen in all.
    • Hi if anyone has Ikea draws. 6 or 4 draw please message me we will collect asap thanks 
    • Fair point. But this is the same Starmer, as I said before, that was seen to be the adult in the room pre-election, following the recent run of chancers, crazies and failures?  I really think the demonisation of him is wrong and it seems to be an epidemic. Johnson got away with things because he was this funny clown.  May was seen to be wooden but didn't attract the same backlash and she facked up Brexit. I saw Corbyn speak as a back bencher and he was excellent.  Didn't make him a great leader.  What would are country have looked like if Brown had got in.  Another person demonised by the media due to his bank manager persona. Yes, I get it, that we lampoon our politicians, based on some of their personal characteristics.  Life was so much more fun during the original series of Spitting Image,  Many politicians loved their send ups.  Some even bought the models/puppets.  Blair was first seen as a little school boy sitting between Prescot in his boiler suit, and Becket perhaps unfairly characterised.  Not sure how they'd send him up as a (alleged) war criminal....  Just concerned that we are now so shallow in considering politics. Anyway, it is not just Starmer, it is his party, in particular his advisors. But perhaps give him a break.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...