Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Someone chopped our bush with an axe just outside our garden (it grows through the fence)- we reported it to the police who said they would send someone round from the Safe Neighbourhood Scheme - it's now a week later and we have not seen anyone. We are not bothered about the bush (we made this clear on the phone to the police) but we are bothered about someone feeling able to be destructive in a public place. Low level vandalism needs to be nipped in the bud (forgive the pun) - just like the Mayor of New York said 'Zero tolerance is the way to go'. What if we were a 'vulnerable' couple relying on the police for support? What then?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/37475-low-level-vandalism/
Share on other sites

You are legally required to trim your bush so it doesnt grow outside your boundary fence/wall.


I have been provided numerous flyers over the years stating you would be fined by the council if they had to do it for you.


I am not saying this "vandalism" is right, but it is likely you have pi$$ed someone off by not trimming your bush and they have taken it into their own hands.


I am not surprised the Safe Neighbourhood Scheme hasnt stopped by. Stick to the rules, and all will be fine.


Zero tolerance to those lazy hedge trimmers too?

More likely that you've annoyed someone by letting it grow out onto the pavement than someone has vandalised you. Not saying it's right to do that, but if it is the case that it it has been left to grow, causing the pavement outside your house to be significantly narrowed, then that would be annoying to anyone who needs to use the pavement.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> More likely that you've annoyed someone by letting

> it grow out onto the pavement than someone has

> vandalised you. Not saying it's right to do that,

> but if it is the case that it it has been left to

> grow, causing the pavement outside your house to

> be significantly narrowed, then that would be

> annoying to anyone who needs to use the pavement.


xxxxxxx


If it was growing a long way out, then I agree.


Trying to get a double buggy past that kind of obstacle, or even a couple of kids walking holding your hands, without having to go onto the road, could be hard.


Mind you, I'd have thought a polite note through your door might have been preferable to their taking matters into their own hands!


But if somebody was wanting to engage in low level vandalism for the sake of it, I'd have thought there were "easier" ways than fetching an axe and chopping at a bush (I refuse to engage in low level innuendo :) )

I did once threaten on the EDF to chop peoples' bushes if they overhang the pavement because I am sick of having to avoid getting my eyes poked out and/or being forced into the road when out for a walk- but I haven't done any yet. There has always been low level vandalism around here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would disagree that the tables outside the Blue Brick bothered nobody. They were not within the cafe's curtilage (one table was even placed on the other side of the road!) but on a narrow public footpath where pedestrians have a "public right of way". Added to that, some customers rearranged the tables so the footpath was blocked completely. 
    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day. Parents, carers and children aged 18 month to 5 years can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...