Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Unless you're in the big city bonus rich plus, huge numbers of people are thinking 'it's now or never'...and I don't just mean first time buyers, I mean everyone in the chain...people wanting to move from a flat to a house, people wanting a bigger house etc.....i work with a load of pretty well (but not extravagantly) paid 30 somethings, at lunch they are practically all on the phone talking to estate agents/solicitors/vendors...it's really noticeably accelerated since christmas even

I would back up quids's post by saying same thing is happening where I work


My take on that is that it underlines my whole point - people who can are now behaving as they always do before a crash, with a herd-like mentality. It may make individual sense for them (then again it might not in the near future), but it's very panicky behaviour

Same where I work too. The more prices rise, the more desirable houses are and the stronger the urge to buy. According to classical economic theory demand is inversely proportional to price but the opposite can happen with status symbols (Veblen goods) and that's currently the case with London property. Rises of 50% a year can't be explained by a shortage or population growth and aren't sustainable.

isn't that a bit laissez faire EP?


yes London housing market is always ferociously active, yes a bubble isn't news


But the amounts of money involved, the number of people pushing/stretching because "now or never" and the ramifications of this particular bubble bursting are what make the current situation so troubling

"isn't that a bit laissez faire EP"


errm, not quite sure what you want *me* to do about it. It's obvious there's a bubble, just pointing out least newsful headline ever.


Not sure this one's any more troubling than the last one, just the timescales are shorter.


The normally disturbing think tank civitas suggested placing limits on foreign investment which seemed sensible to me.

Though not sure foreigners buying up acres of riverside penthouses and chelsea mansions is really the root cause.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless you're in the big city bonus rich plus,

> huge numbers of people are thinking 'it's now or

> never'...and I don't just mean first time buyers,

> I mean everyone in the chain...people wanting to

> move from a flat to a house, people wanting a

> bigger house etc.....i work with a load of pretty

> well (but not extravagantly) paid 30 somethings,

> at lunch they are practically all on the phone

> talking to estate agents/solicitors/vendors...it's

> really noticeably accelerated since christmas even



Very true and exactly the position I am in. It isn't a property ladder as such anymore - its a ladder with missing rungs. Once you're on, it doesn't mean you can easily move up to the "next level".

heh - not suggesting anyone on here be responsible for doing anything


But if you think it's less troubling then last one then I guess we dffer on that point. I see the attractiveness of that argument (if it's cyclical we've been here before and will be again) but as I said, the amounts of money this time are of a different order of magnitude.


In 2008 most of the western economies were interchangibly affected by the global nature of events. There was a motivation to look at global solutions. But this is entirely local and self-inflicted. And with too much resting on it


I think the fall out of this crash will far exceed the 2008 one


suggestions about what to do? Pick any measure you like, but if the population with property is too self-interested, or the powers in charge too in-denial then any discussion is moot. It will just play out to it's natural conclusion


But off top of my head, the usual controls - much stricter lmits on borrowing multiples, multiple home ownership, buy to let etc. - seem entirely sensible

Purely anecdotally, but I think that more properties are coming onto the market now in the area in which we have bought, as I am still getting alerts for Wallington, Carshalton and Cheam. I seem to be receiving more alerts, and more with two properties on. Luckily of us, I've not seen anywhere else I prefer the look of! I wouldn't say the market was flooded, but I have been wondering if people have heard that the market is more buoyant, and therefore post-Christmas have put their properties up for sale. Presumably this will have an effect on the supply/demand/price equation. Are many more properties coming on the market in ED yet?

It's madness out there. I viewed a three bed maisonette in Nunhead at the weekend. It had been advertised as "needing cosmetic work" and was on at ?285,000. The reality was somewhat different and instead if the paint job and new carpets i was imagining, you would need to gut it totally and spend a good ?15,000 to ?20,000 to make it somewhere you would want to think about living.


When i said to the agent that at that price we simply wouldn't have the immediate spare cash to do the work the place required to make it habitable she replied - "oh if you buy it it will gain in value in the next two years even if you do nothing"


It didn't seem to have occured to her that we were looking for a place to live in not an investment.

I think that more than ever, a lot of local estate agents are really taking the piss, i.e. 3 bed houses in SE15 in uninhabitable condition, with ludicrous asking prices which they will surely never acheive. Just because some smug git with gelled hair says that your house is worth a million, you shouldn't necessarily believe it. It's not indicative of the wider London property market, which is currently increasing at around 11% year-on-year.

For lots of people (like me) it really is "now or never". I am never going to save a 20% deposit. This Help to Buy Scheme won't last forever, so I've had to jump.


I am well aware that in a couple of years time, the mortgage payments may well get nasty, but it's this or keep renting til our parents die (which hopefully won't be for a long time).

If you look at asking prices vs actual sold prices, there does seem to be a big inconsistency. There is of course a lag in terms of published sold prices and current asking prices which may account for some of this (assuming prices have actually soared over a period of just a couple of months), but I suspect that asking prices are pretty optimistic in some instances.
You're right rahrahrah. To be honest we could probably have pushed this vendor down by at least ?10,000 - ?15,000 and funded the work that needed doing but the i didn't like the place that much to do the work and live in a building site for a few months (as we can't afford to rent and pay a mortgage at the same time for any longer than a couple of months). It would have to be a real project - the boiler was broken, the bathroom was a health hazard and it had been disconnected from gas and electricty, and oddly all the internal doors had been replaced by those odd temporary chipboard doors locksmiths use. Not for the faint hearted!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...