Jump to content

Recommended Posts

AbDabs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two relatively normal houses are shown as having

> been sold in Melbourne Grove for exactly ?1M each.

> That must be the reason why someone in

> Chesterfield grove thinks they can get ?1.2M. I'm

> tempted to start a book on that one.


But at least the Chesterfield Grove is 5 bed, how about the three bed in Crawthew Grove for ?1.2 million?

Two years ago, a property on my street went for 345k. Last November, one went for 485k which seemed an incredible increase for such a short period of time, yet a mere 5 months later, another property is up for sale at 625k. Overheated market, yes I think so.
The fact that the one on Frogley at 895 is still not sold tells me everything. Popular properties at a vaguely credible price go before they come to market. Properties still on the market after 3 weeks will inevitably be reduced and leave the owner with their greed publicly and hilariously unsatisfied. There's currently hardly anything on the market so anyone who's in a mood to buy at that price would already have done so.

What's even more galling is the amount of money estate agents earn for such sloppy, unprofessional work. Here's an ad from Haarts for a flat in a "Quite road" at which viewing is "Recomened" and which apparently has a nearby fishmonger called "Moxtons". Sigh.

http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-45512843.html

aileking Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AbDabs Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Two relatively normal houses are shown as

> having

> > been sold in Melbourne Grove for exactly ?1M

> each.

> > That must be the reason why someone in

> > Chesterfield grove thinks they can get ?1.2M.

> I'm

> > tempted to start a book on that one.

>

> But at least the Chesterfield Grove is 5 bed, how

> about the three bed in Crawthew Grove for ?1.2

> million?


I'd hardly call the additional rooms bedrooms... just rooms. There's nothing special about the house and the state of the bathrooms and garden? What kind of idiot is seriously going to pay that kinda money for that rubbish? I've I had that kinda of money to burn I would expect a high end spec for that money. I'm disappointed and confused how that price tag can be applied to a property that doesn't really offer value for money *shrugs*

Looking rather like prices have peaked for the time being. Sales activity has also slowed a bit. Plenty houses coming on at daft/greed driven prices in the past month haven't sold? and are now taking offers?.there;s a limit to what the buying public will take.
The estate agents are the worst in SE22! Soooo arrogant & many unprofessional. ED is a nice area, and the property is worth as much as people are prepared to pay. I wish people would sell privately and bypass these agents. It's so easy & you just go straight to the conveyancer.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looking rather like prices have peaked for the

> time being. Sales activity has also slowed a bit.

> Plenty houses coming on at daft/greed driven

> prices in the past month haven't sold? and are now

> taking offers?.there;s a limit to what the buying

> public will take.


Yeah I've definitely noticed a few places sitting on the market... i.e. 3 bed houses in Peckham which need a total refurb for 750K. Or pimped-up terraced houses in ED for >1M. It's just not realistic, and in some cases just plain greedy. Hopefully we've reached a point where buyers are thinking "enough is enough".


But I fear selling privately won't take off until private sellers can add their properties to Rightmove/etc, and even if that happens, sellers will probably still get greedy with asking prices.

I think Wooster & Stock offer a 'sell it yourself' 'flat fee' service which gives you access to their usual advertising packages including portals such as Right Move - but you do the rest yourself. I think it was ?1k or something like that.


Everyone likes to make noise about doing away with the agents (at least as far as possible) but I wonder how many people have taken them up on the offer - when it came down to it?


Sounded like pretty good value to me.

The main advantage for me would be that the agents conduct the viewings. That might seem easy at the moment (show a load of people round on a Saturday and wait for the offers to flood in) but that's not how these things traditionally work... in "normal" market conditions it can take weeks or months to sell a property, and giving up your evenings and weekends to show people around would be a serious pain in the ass.
*Bob* I did mention elsewhere that we'd rented out using a portal company (uPad). and when I suggesteed maybe people should use them for sales everyone bleated on about false economy, which was just a bit weird if you ask me, seems like the future to me.

The common moan is that the agents do sod all but have access to the advertising which sells your house by itself etc etc.


I thought it was interesting to see an agent who's prepared to challenge that moan with a proposition along the lines of 'if you think it's that easy, you do it'

The thing I resent is that estate agents are usually the slowest link in the chain. Always find it hilarious to get a call from the agent saying, 'we've managed to agree x or y with the buyer/seller' and my response is usually, 'yes I know, I spoke to the buyer/seller and agreed it 2 days ago.' If you want your property transaction to take 4 months, leave it to the agents and lawyers. If you want it done in 6 weeks, do it yourself.
I can't believe that I am writing this, but having recently sold and bought, both sets of estate agents were, on the whole, brilliant. Admittedly my flat sold in 4 days, and I expected them to lose interest after that. But they nursed both deals all the way through. The weak links in the system turned out to be my solicitor (whose standards had clearly slipped since I last used them), my buyers common sense, then my lender being unable to read plain English and deciding there was a problem with my purchase, despite the surveyor telling them 4 times that there wasn't. The estate agents were great. Now I need to go and have a lie down to recover from the shock of praising estate agents...
Oh mine did lots. Lots of emails asking questions which I diligently answered, sometimes multiple times. This was followed up by an email asking ME to collate my responses! They received a very choicely worded email back telling them politely to do their job, and if they wanted one email with all the answers in, to just send one with all the questions in. He backed down pretty rapidly.

Like most things in life you get what you pay for.


From what I have seen, people try and scrimp and save on legal fees when it comes to buying / selling property and end up going with the cheapest solictor they can find...it is hardly a shock when they end up being rubbish or slow. At these low fee levels it is all about volume for a surveyancing solicitor so they will have a lot of potential transactions running at any one time.

We've tried super cheap and eye-wateringly expensive and experienced much the same service with both. The only difference with eye-wateringly expensive is that they have a shop-front on a nearby street where you can make a nuisance of yourself. Super cheap means a call centre somewhere far away which makes it far more difficult to hassle people.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...