Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is anyone else finding that rents in East Dulwich are getting ridiculous?


Since when did people start charging ?1600+bills for a 2 bed with no garden, yes it might be recently referbished but most rental properties in London are refurbished nowadays and I wouldn't call neutral decor and some decent tiles in a kitchen a particularly high spec refurb. I earn a very decent wage but am loathe to pay nearly ?2k for a normal flat which a year and a half ago only cost ?1300 max to rent. No wonder no one can get on the property ladder, because we can't keep any money to save.


Anyone agree or disagree?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/37464-extortionate-rents/
Share on other sites

I am sure that it is a very expensive area to rent now and I do feel sorry for anyone needing rented accommodation here. What I do notice is that nearly every newly built or refurbed flat of house soon has a 'To Let' sign outside. It seems that as soon as property becomes available along comes the 'Buy To Let' brigade ready to make a fast buck leaving first time buyers will little chance to get a place.

I think that this is the case throughout most of the country and this government is unlikely to really do much to change the situation.


Good luck joepud - welcome to 'New' East Dulwich.

i*rate you're so right. We are trying to move house to get something a little bigger but can afford practically nothing in ED/Peckham/Nunhead/Camberwell. A run-down house that needs everything doing to it came on the market on saturday at the top of our budget. I rang up yesterday (i.e. 2 days later) and was told that there had already been 40 viewings, 12 offers and the highest offer, so far, was over ?50,000 above asking price. They were still accepting viewings and offers! Rental and sales in property in London have gone nuts recently. Grrr...

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But do you remember what it was like? My partner

> lived here in the 90s and you can't really compare

> it. Whether you preferred it before or now is a

> different question but the place has changed as

> have the rents.

>

> There are still cheaper places in London to live.


It was - a different place. If anyone had mentioned gentrification we would have laughed like drains! I quite liked it though.


I have to agree re affordability - you move where you can afford. The ideal would be that all areas in London had affordable housing/rents but there is a fat chance of that sadly.

joepud Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is anyone else finding that rents in East Dulwich

> are getting ridiculous?

>

> Since when did people start charging ?1600+bills

> for a 2 bed with no garden, yes it might be

> recently referbished but most rental properties in

> London are refurbished nowadays and I wouldn't

> call neutral decor and some decent tiles in a

> kitchen a particularly high spec refurb. I earn a

> very decent wage but am loathe to pay nearly ?2k

> for a normal flat which a year and a half ago only

> cost ?1300 max to rent. No wonder no one can get

> on the property ladder, because we can't keep any

> money to save.

>

> Anyone agree or disagree?



there are plenty of decent 2 bed flats in se22 for under ?1400.


me thinks you exaggerate a bit to make a point

I just passed Haarts window, and there was a spacious-looking 2-bed, modern, nice kitchen, in SE22 for ?1,100/month. I think there will always be a few expensive exceptions, if the landlord can get away with it, but there are cheaper options available in SE22 by the look of it.
We moved here to pay less rent and have more room compared to a flat in Limehouse. What I can't work out is how the rent is cheaper but the house up the road is going for 30% more than the place we moved out of went for (we only moved because it was sold by the landlord). Am I missing something?

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Willing to bet anyone going to that 1100 flat will

> find out a few significant problems

>

> But hey it's only 1100 English pounds. Every

> month

>

> Nothing to worry about


We rent out our 2nd property, a 2 bedroom garden flat on a nice quiet handsome road in SE23, very nicely done up, and with tip top fixture and fittings, for a grand a month. Not all of us are greedy b4stards.

edd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, but SE23 isn't East Dulwich, is it? It's all

> about the postcode for some people.


I don't see why. Well, technically I do, but it is actually rubbish. And to be honest, we're thinking of moving back to CP. It's got a more... friendly feel to it, in my opinion. We've not massively enjoyed living in ED these past 5 years, it can be very staid, and we miss a lot about CP.

a fish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edd Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yeah, but SE23 isn't East Dulwich, is it? It's

> all

> > about the postcode for some people.

>

> I don't see why. Well, technically I do, but it is

> actually rubbish. And to be honest, we're thinking

> of moving back to CP. It's got a more... friendly

> feel to it, in my opinion. We've not massively

> enjoyed living in ED these past 5 years, it can be

> very staid, and we miss a lot about CP.



Well spent five years then, still it,s only FIVE FOOKING YEARS OF YOUR LIFE so nothing lost, good work

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well spent five years then, still it,s only FIVE

> FOOKING YEARS OF YOUR LIFE so nothing lost, good

> work


At least we gave it a try. Plus, I have a feeling we'd be back to Moxons most weekends, CP doesn't seem to have a fishmonger.

Rents/ house prices are high when an area is desirable and when there are insufficient properties there to meet demand. If you want there to be more properties in ED to rent or buy (and hence reduce the 'premium' on local property which is now in short supply), then you need to get local politicians to re-think their local zoning plans to allow more properties to be built and higher density living. If people, for instance, who then want to keep cars close to their properties find that is no longer possible in ED then that in itself will reduce a certain sort of demand for accommodation and reduce the pricing opportubities for landlords and sellers (by making ED less desirable).


Of course, ED may well become less desirable as LL becomes blighted with closing shops and higher shop rents, so maybe that will reduce the pressures for people to live here.


The irony is that all the things that make ED a good place to live-in (desirable) are making it more desired, which is pricing out (some) of those people who do want to live here. Make it less desirable (e.g. by increasing housing density to meet housing demands) and then fewer people will desire it. At a certain cross-over point that makes building more accommodation no longer economically attractive (as returns fall).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...