Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone


I'm currently running a survey about the economic climate, what peoples views are compared to what the media are continually reporting. And as part of that i wanted to ask the people of East Dulwich (and i'm a resident too!) what views they had.


The survey will take no longer than 5 minutes and its totally independent. We've not been commissioned to do this by anyone, we're not being paid any money to do this, we simply want to know the truth and report it as such.


To take part simply visit, www.clarityuk.net and follow the link.


I've asked the administrator's permission to post this here, which was granted. So please take part, give your view and if you want to see the full results when we close the survey, simply register at the end.


We'll be running regular surveys which people can take part in and we'll share the results in our secure area, warts and all. So have your say and thanks for listening.


Paul

ClarityUK.net

Thank you to everyone who has so far completed the survey, much appreciated.


Thanks to ??? and willdex too for your honest opinions. I'll always listen to feedback with the intention of constantly improving what we do.


Again thanks for your views.


Paul

Great point Macroban.


There isn't an agreed formal definition of recession, the newspapers seem to have grabbed this simplistic 'two quarters' and politicians have followed suit because it conveniently means that recessions of up to 10 months can go un-reported.


This isn't necessarily a bad thing. Economies are built on public confidence, so 'recession talk' generates recessions and damages lives that would otherwise have been unaffected. A 'technical truth' isn't such a good thing if it makes the pain worse.


Secondly, recession can be misunderstood. We expect recession to refer to the bad times. However, recession only refers to a shrinking economy. Businesses are often slow to react to tighter cashflow, and redundancies and smaller bonuses can be slow to show. We often suffer the worst pain from recessions 1 or 2 years after the recession has ceased to exist.

The current climate has made me feel a bit poorer for various reasons. But I've not really altered my spending habits as a result. Food is supposed to be 10% more expensive. Why have eggs gone up by 37%? If they are free range then its not the bttery farm lighting and fuel to transport them is not quite 37% more expensive....yet.


I'm more interested in the behaviour in this climate by age i.e. how those who have seen 3 recessions before (I'm guessing Macroban) behave vs those of us who have only known the good times i.e. under 32 years of age. Or home owners versus non home owners goven property makes most of us feel "rich" or "poor". That's a good angle Paul, that would be more useful from a marketing perspective. And I think you might get a different response.


Do you become more risk averse with age having lived through at least 1 recession? Or do you take the contrarian view and see it as opportunity? I take the Standard headlines with a pinch of salt - I can see with my own eyes whats happening (and yes its not great but IMO not as bad yet either). Annoying how all these "post"casters have popped up telling us the economy is bad when they didnt have the guts stick their neck out to say it would all end so suddenly in a few months.


What goes up must come down. Before coming up again after some pain. The economy is cyclical. Is that really news? Are we really suprised?


Anyway... expensive eggs? Why?

Yes, I was around in the last real recession which ran from roughly 1978-1982 whatever the "official" statistics say. What came since were just minor blimps. 1978-1982 was difficult to manage but we got through without me making any staff redundant.


This one does not smell quite the same as 1978-1982. It has some striking similarities to the 1946-1954 austerity too.


At present it seems that young people are maintaining their lifestyle and consumerism by increasing their unsecured debt (still increasing rapidly until people hit their multiple credit limits), not saving (savings ratio lowest since 1956), and drawing down on savings (cashing in policies, ISAs and suchlike). Some are said to be paying their mortgages with their credit cards. It may be true that there is a very sharp learning curve coming.


My peer group have a tendency to try and save more in these circumstances. It may be only a few pounds here and a few pounds there and the savings will attract negative interest rates.

Hi MrBen,

i can tell you re ; EXPENSIVE EGGS ;it's because of the fact that chickens are fed on wheat (or maize) and that is what has risen in price massively dut to fuel/demand/biofuels/speculative traders. The other rearing costs have also risen but less so. I may make the final, minor point, that given the above rises, the cot of agricultural land has risen by 40% in 1 year, affecting free range chicks.



lots more to say re there not having been a early 90's recession but the eggs issue is frankly more interestng to all those except people who have no clue how the economy works. Im also interested in why the main dishes in the Bishop dont come with fries!??!?


Will

There's certainly merit in that as an idea Mr Ben. Thanks for putting your head above the parapet.


It's funny you mention comparing age ranges and how people react. It was something we considered at the outset. The reason we didn't in the end was a perception of being branded ageist and also a negative effect on people completing it.


We're currently debating what to run next. The top of the pile is relating to the Olympics. It could be sport related, it could be political, it could be a variety of things and as London is the next host following Beijing we probably have more than a passing interest.


So if anyone's interested or wants to put forward an angle.... we're all ears.


By the way... the economic survey will be closing at midnight Monday.


Thanks everyone


Paul

Clarityuk.net

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...