Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't know if anyone else feels this way but I do think there is an excess of t-wats in East Dulwich and I think this can mainly be attributed to the laziness of the council.


This is not the countryside, it is a capital city. Therefore it seems quite unacceptable to allow the t-wats to get out of control in the way that they do. They stir up arguements with their stupid concepts which can cause people with thinking difficulties many problems, and dead conversations can fall off and injure people?s intellegence. Discussions blocked by rotting concepts can cause serious harm to your mental health. They also encourage stupid postings and other pests.


I am not anti-t-wat per se but I think they should be kept to appropriate areas. I would like to hear other peoples' views on this matter as I am currently drafting a letter to local councillors as well as Boris Johnston.



understand more about this post here

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3712-too-many-t-wats-in-east-dulwich/
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see what you guys are saying but perhaps ease

> off a bit. Wouldn't want it to end up all,

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?0

> ,file=1327

>

> in here.


Do not worry, Brendan, I am quite thick skinned and perfectly accustomed to these attempts at satire perpetuated by those who would rather not take my points seriously.


This one is not too bad, and has caused me very mild amusement, although I think I could probably have done better myself. My main criticism would be the use of the term "T-wat" which feels a little contrived and clunky; I think with a little more time the author could have come up with something more imaginative.

Precisely what points are we meant to be taking seriously?

I thought this was all for fun.


jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I see what you guys are saying but perhaps ease

> > off a bit. Wouldn't want it to end up all,

> >

> >

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?0

>

> > ,file=1327

> >

> > in here.

>

> Do not worry, Brendan, I am quite thick skinned

> and perfectly accustomed to these attempts at

> satire perpetuated by those who would rather not

> take my points seriously.

>

> This one is not too bad, and has caused me very

> mild amusement, although I think I could probably

> have done better myself. My main criticism would

> be the use of the term "T-wat" which feels a

> little contrived and clunky; I think with a little

> more time the author could have come up with

> something more imaginative.

jrussel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I see what you guys are saying but perhaps ease

> > off a bit. Wouldn't want it to end up all,

> >

> >

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?0

>

> > ,file=1327

> >

> > in here.

>

> Do not worry, Brendan, I am quite thick skinned

> and perfectly accustomed to these attempts at

> satire perpetuated by those who would rather not

> take my points seriously.

>

> This one is not too bad, and has caused me very

> mild amusement, although I think I could probably

> have done better myself. My main criticism would

> be the use of the term "T-wat" which feels a

> little contrived and clunky; I think with a little

> more time the author could have come up with

> something more imaginative.




Jrussel


Ypu are correct in your assumption, sadly the word I really wanted to put in wouldn't be acceptable to a lot of people, even though they were thinking it.... so "T-Wat" was the most 'appropriate' in this situation....but I am sure, now that I have had beer that I could come up with a different word, however I can't be bothered (does this tree look bothered?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks - an overnight stay,  a drip and painkillers seems to have done its work!
    • Depends on who can afford to purchase or lease it and what The Dulwich Estate, Stonegate and Southwark Council will allow to be built or operate on the site. Whatever it is, it needs to attract footfall for itself and businesses around it. The question to ask is what does that part of Dulwich need, that is not within the locality, which will attract custom and footfall, that the site can accommodate and that can offer parking which it already has available. In between Cox's Walk, Dulwich Village, Dulwich College and the park, some sort of establishment that sells drinks and meals. Bit then I'm just chucking ideas around, or maybe someone, Dean, has some radical idea's to take it in a totally different direction.    Whatever it becomes it has to be better than the rotting site and eyesore it currently is. Good luck to anyone who takes on the project to redevelop the former Grove Tavern. 
    • Some of the problems with the drains are down to the council I think. There was a small lake on the northern side of goose green this morning (probably not a bad thing as it might float some of the dog waste out of the park into the drains eventually).  anyway, I saw it resolved by some bloke clearing the leaves on a drain in East Dulwich Road north (at least the bit in the road drained away and stopped flooding the park further). If the council cleared the leaves and streets more than once every three months these problems would happen less. There's plenty of surplus revenue from the roads so I dont understand why the council can't keep them clean.
    • Hi all,  We recently had the front badge stolen from our VW Golf, the car sensor is kept behind the badge and was also stolen. This was two weeks ago and since then have noticed other VWs around ED had also had the same issue, a badge and sensor stolen.  We've been quoted over £1000 from our local VW garage to replace these.  I am aware this has been going on for some time in South London generally (https://www.theguardian.com/business/article/2024/may/04/vw-cars-parts-theft-cruise-control-sensors-insurance-golf-passat), which leads me to think... a.) It's VWs issue for this terrible design fault so why should we pay b.) If we do get a new sensor and badge the same thing will surely happen again, thus leading to further costs down the line I wonder if anyone else who had this issue is on the group? And how they dealt with VW? They are being very unhelpful and in our most recent correspondence said we 'should have kept the car in a garage' 🫠
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...