Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone!!


May be we are not alone in this but at the moment we are in the difficult position to choose the secondary schools for our kid next year moving to year seven.


After expending hours reading about it as much as I could about the top schools in southwark, I still not understand quite clear how this schools are rating.


Anyone out there who can give me some tips will be very much appreciated!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/36633-secondary-schools/
Share on other sites

As far as I know most schools have a G&T programme. If you are concerned make sure you ask at your school tours. All secondary schools in my experience stream so even if you're unsure of G&T programmes your child is likely to be sufficiently stretched if they perform highly. We looked for a school where we felt that our child would be nurtured and recognised as an individual as we knew that in a large school with lots of very high achieving children he may be lost. One year down and we're pretty happy.
Which school is your child at, EDMummy? The pastoral side is extremely important to us too (see my thread on Deptford Green) but for complicated reasons beyond just stealth boasting, we would like to know which schools are viewed as being best with G&T kids. We've asked on every tour so far, and will continue to do so, but what they tell you about what they do, and what actually happens, might not really match up!

As EDmummy says most if not all secondary schools have a G&T programme (although it may not be called that). I don't think your child will automatically get into it though. The schools assess the children with CATs test at the start of Year 7 and based on these results the children will be selected for G&T programme. I think also they are picked for particular abilities eg maths, literacy, sport etc rather than a blanket G&T for everything.


You could try him for one of the super selective grammars in the suburbs if you think he is that able?


ETA have not fear about under stiumlus at secondary school - so much bigger and busier and lots of new subjects to learn!

It's a complicated situation which I don't really want to go into but grammars aren't really an option. I've had some very interesting PMs so thank you. I do feel reassured that he will be more stretched than at primary (thank goodness) but we do need to know whether there are schools that are particularly well known for good G&T programmes and there seems to be no way to find out, so maybe there aren't any differences.

G&T is no longer a nationally required measure (mainly because it was a completely bunkum salve to be honest) - some maintain it as a register but I have never seen the point as all students should have individual learning plans


However you are right to question whether your child will be stretched and that should certainly happen at any good secondary - being set with children of similar or higher ability can makes a big difference to some who have always been at the top. If you have a bright child then secondary can be a far better environment as they are in a bigger pool and possibly no longer than the brightest in their class nor will they find the work as easy s they will be taught by subject specialists with specialist knowledge,


If your child has a talent in sport or maths, music or performing arts then specific schools do have a reputation for being good or offering scholarships.


If you have a truly gifted child - a child who is years ahead (in NC levels we would be talking considerably higher than a level 5 or 6 child at primary) then I'm not actually sure any secondary school is particularly well equipped for that if I'm honest

I'm only using G&T as shorthand although at least one school seems to use the term still, from what we've seen so far.


We are looking forward to seeing him be stretched AND find out he is not the cleverest child ever made - both will be equally good for him, I hope. As I said, there are other factors, but I am feeling increasingly assured that we'll be able to find the right place for him. Luckily, he's not a genius!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...