Jump to content

Recommended Posts

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yes, big problems

>

> am on my 17th consecutive day of no hot water or

> heating

>

> and have half a living room, as a lot of water

> came in through the front of the building, and

> through our ceiling- also for the past 17 days


xxxxxx


OMG that's terrible.


Who are these people?

Same here, but obviously not as bad. Had some minor electrical problems to sort out. Apparently the new Kier/Grainger team don't deal with electrical issues, so it was sub-contracted out. The sub-contractors phoned me the following day and the earliest they could deal was after the weekend and could only give an AM/PM- up till 5.00pm appointment time. So much for men in smart new Kier/Grainger uniforms with ID cards and appointment times to suit, including evenings and weekends.

Looks like Kier promised the earth to get the contract, but cant deliver.

I counted six new Grainger/Kier maintenance vans parked in the square the other day, which must be quite galling for Rach1983. Hope you get your problems sorted soon.

Thanks pcmesq :)

Yeah Grainger's own team were brilliant, we never had any problem with them at all and they always fixed everything really quickly. I think that's what makes it worse that they were taken away and replaced with this company. It just really annoys me when small local businesses/services are taken over by national companies who are so impersonal and you can never actually speak to anyone in charge. Grrrr ;)

Also having nightmares which is a huge shame given how brilliant Grainger and the team in Dulwich have been in the past. 2 week wait for a maintenance appointment, says they do saturdays and evenings but it turns out they don't, also have failed to turn up for booked in appointments. Really hoping this is teething trouble and it gets sorted as its a huge hassle at the moment.

Thank you for the feedback above. We apologise for the inconvenience and problems you may have experienced during the first few weeks of our new service. We believe that all the outstanding repairs mentioned above have now been resolved.


In order to help us ensure that we can avoid such problems in the future, please make sure that your provide feedback to our staff when you are asked. Feel free to also contact either Kier by telephone on 0345 300 5824 or at [email protected] or Grainger at [email protected]. Thank you, Grainger plc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...