Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Help-Ma-Boab,


I wasn't slagging off 'The Ivy House' or posting negative comments. Just stating that I was surprised by the lack of publicity.


As I live nearby, I was looking forward to the opening as I thought it would be quite a big occasion, due to all the work that has gone into it.


I suppose I'm a bit disappointed that the locals (who couldn't buy shares, so got no newsletter) were not even aware it had opened.


Surely, the more publicity, the more likely it is to succeed, which I hope it does.


Anyway, back to the original topic.


Which is about a cinema, not a pub!!

Oh dear, here we go again. "Laid back" or its grimmer stablemate "pretty laid back" just means "clueless, gormless, can't be arsed" and is rampant in Britain. Why should cheap mean crap, or not as good as somewhere where you pay a few quid more? Cheap is good - I love Aldi, Netto, and the pound shops in Peckham; if they can be cheap, cheerful and clued-up, why not a cinema?

I've been going there regularly for the last few years and I can confirm I have never had lice or fleas. I've also never shown up only to find a showing cancelled. The staff do an alright job, never had a problem with them.


PeckhamPlex is great. It gets a decent variety of films, it's cheap, the a/v is decent, it's easy to get to, it's comfortable enough. Yeah, it could do with a deep clean of carpets and a facelift, and some of the screen rooms smell like old people, but those are all minor issues.

It's very convenient, cheap as chips, independent and it has Frank's cafe on the roof, all of which make it an asset in my opinion. But I can't blame people for getting annoyed with wrong schedules, especially if they are queuing up with kids.


Agree with whoever said it will be a characterless odeon in a few years, but would quite like it to turn into something more like ritzy - half pretentious arthouse with obscure & foreign films and half mainstream stuff.

What all the other positive posters said. I'd definitely miss the plex if it closed (despite the fact that last month when I turned up at baby cinema to find out it wasn't on in the summer, I asked if I could see the Alan partridge film, they said I couldn't because the baby was underage. She's 8 weeks - its a 15. Was too dumbfounded to put up too much resistance)

unlurked Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Last time I was there,ages ago,there was a bullet

> shaped hole in the screen. Spoilt the experience.



A bullet would have made a round hole rather than a bullet-shaped hole, so at least it wasn't caused by a gunshot.

Agree the multiplex is great value - went to see the last Dustin Hoffman directed film there ( The Quartet). Every time someone came into the cinema there was a cheer. In the end there were about 20 of us watching the film with most of the audience talking briefly afterwards.

popcorn and drinks a bit too pricey for us .

One night hubby and I went to the pics and then nipped to the Chinese near Morrisons for a meal. Great night out for less than ?25

Last time I went, which was admittedly some years ago, I remember my feet sticking to the floor and most of the rest of the audience talking through the film. Vowed I'd never go back which was a pity as it is very convenient compared to Brixton and of course much cheaper.
You can't possibly complain about an establishment that charges less than half of the going London rate for a screening. We love this cinema and are regular patrons. It's more like a posh student cinema and there's nothing about it which pretends to be more than it is. It does seem a little shambolic at times but the tickets are a fiver. And 2.50 on a Wednesday if you're with Orange. If you expect better, then you're free to avail yourself of the many sparklingly drab major chains. Which in my experience have often screwed up their listings and their film prints, offer laughingly eye-watering prices for their concessions and take far longer to get to from ED than the ghettoplex. Long may it remain.

Blackcurrant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> unlurked Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Last time I was there,ages ago,there was a

> bullet

> > shaped hole in the screen. Spoilt the

> experience.

>

>

> A bullet would have made a round hole rather than

> a bullet-shaped hole, so at least it wasn't caused

> by a gunshot.



Haha, good work.

I love the plex, we go every week and I've never shown up and found something not showing. Its genuinely one of the positives of living round here for me.


We used to live in north london and travel to the cineworld in wood green, that or go on a giant trek to the odeon in swiss cottage. Two of us plus drinks was always 30 quid and the queues were twice as long as the plex, plus it smelled. Really, really badly. 3D tickets at an odeon are nearly 20 pounds a head, I find that very hard to justify.


It can be a little informal, but I have always found the staff polite and helpful, and again - 5 pounds a head for a night out. Just can't argue with that.

It's very handy for me and very cheap. I'm really happy it exists as a local cinema. I see far more films than I would if I had to jump on a bus to the Ritzy, which, admittedly, offers a better cinema experience.


My only criticism is that the ticket/popcorn area could operate more efficiently. They used to have a ticket booth which allowed you to get in quickly. Now, you have to queue up with people who are buying popcorn, drinks etc, which is often quite chaotic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...