Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James, your phrasing makes it sound like the two are miles apart (the distance can more accurately be measured in yards), and with Turnham School as far from the border on the Lewisham side, is there an Honor Oak ward councillor equally getting their knickers in a twist about this?!

James, the proposal is that Ivydale should move from 2FE to 4FE so 60 additional reception places. In reality, Ivydale has coped with an additional bulge class in each of the last two years so the leap will not be that great. Being spread over two sites means that children will not feel they are in a massive 720-pupil primary. The knack will be in minimising movement between sites during the school day.


As Renata says, everything is at an early stage and Ivydale governors have yet to move this beyond "agreement to engage in consultation with Southwark".

Hi buggie,

They are clearly close but with the catchment areas for some schools being 250-400m even short distances can make a huge difference.


Hi Mugglesworth,

Coping with the odd bulge class is quite different from adding permanently 420 more children to a school. Ivydale having 840 pupild is getting secondary school size.

It would be better to open a new school on Stuart Road with 60 pupils per year. Same overall pupil numbers but a better experience for the children and better chance of creating an outstanding school.

Does the area really need another school from the Harris chain?


They seem to be expanding aggressivley, despite most parents not wanting them. Parents and Camden Juniors Carshalton and at Roke in Croydon have not been happy with the conversion of their schools as seen in this story:

Harris Chain Fails to Win Over Parents


"Girls were having their pinafores unzipped to check they had a logoed Harris top underneath." What nice people they have there at those Harris schools!


It is clear that the Secretary of State for Education favours the Tory Party donor Lord Harris. It also appears that he has lesser politicians doing his bidding as well.


Very sad.

Hi ticket2ride,

We've 249 local families supporting two new Harris primary schools being built locally in East Dulwich area. The agreed vision is schools aiming for progress and results in the top 10% for England & Wales. Selection on distance.


Do we need them? We appear to have a stark choice. Expanding existing schools above the ideal size for the children and getting/keeping great experiences and results OR more schools. Tony Blair introduced that the only way to build new schools is via Academy/Free schools. Harris have an amazing track record of creating new schools. No local authority can match them.


I can't say where Harris have been parachuted in it's looked great - such as the two examples you've given. And yes the Harris Federation have been helpful to the SoS in such contentious situations. But that's not what is happening locally. Harris are not being asked to take over existing schools.


To be honest I'm not bothered whether Harris funded by a Tory supporter or within reason any other type of political supporter. It's about ensuring great school places for local children not about political preferences.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...