Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That is exactly why I have them. I have more control of my bike when I am attached to it esp when pulling away. Your feet don't slip or move on the pedals allowing me to get out of the way of traffic as quickly as possible.

I generally use brakes to stop.

I have pedals that are SPD on one side and flat on the other so makes life easier I guess but SPDs are so easy to click in and out of that I barely notice myself doing it..

jimbo1964 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where in ED were those taken? The second blur

> particularly impressive.


It's Smithfields meat market.


Lots of issues around Holborn - it's very dangerous for everyone

so I bet the cyclists try and avoid it.

JohnL Wrote:

> It's Smithfields meat market.


One of them is. The other - the blur - is, appropriately enough, on the pavement outside Bart's hospital. Yes, it's a wide pavement, but there's also quite a lot of pedestrian traffic on it, it's a good cut through from St Paul's/Holborn to Clerkenwell, plus there's an entrance to the hospital there. However, King Edward St is one way, so you regularly get idiots cycling on the pavement. A friend of mine who works nearby was hit quite badly last year on the precise spot that photo was taken, and called a c*nt for his trouble.

Another blur this morning. Just past the guy with the trolley is the Lycra Lout who actually clipped my elbow as he shot past from behind. I yelled at him to cycle on the road, his answer was "Well don't walk in the middle of the fcuking pavement then". So now we have to give way to the selfish w4nkers? At 6:30am when the road is near-empty? Lovely.

This is the point that Lady D and others ignore (and I speak as a cyclist who has a young child who else cycles).


Pedastrians have priority on the pavement. It's common sense that dictates this, as well as the law, and any cyclist who goes on the pavement must respect that.


Cyclists who behave like a fish describes give all the rest a bad name, but think it's ok because of the massive chip they have in their shoulder. I agree totally with Lady D about the need to have much better provision for cyclists, but until then pedastrians get priority on the pavements.


I used to work on St Johns st, just north of the market, and totally back up a fish's description of cyclists around there. What really annoys me about incidents like he/she has is the way the cyclists never stop to discuss what happens, just swear at us and ride off. Cowards.

I've lived in this area a long time and I can honestly say that I have not seen people cycling along the pavement in ED. If they have been, then they have clearly been doing so carefully enough that I have not had reason to notice them. Whilst I agree that no one should be cycling along the pavement, I'm genuinely amazed that it is such a regular problem for some people on here.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cyclist and bus had a coming together outside

> peckham rye station this morning apparently. Only

> details I know are that he wasn't wearing a helmet

> and there was a crowd of paramedics present.


He was wearing a helmet and looked in a bad way

kenand Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Cyclist and bus had a coming together outside

> > peckham rye station this morning apparently.

> Only

> > details I know are that he wasn't wearing a

> helmet

> > and there was a crowd of paramedics present.

>

> He was wearing a helmet and looked in a bad way


apologies- typo on my part, meant to write he WAS wearing a helmet and it probably saved his life


this is very much anecdotal though

On one occasion I had a No. 12 driver race and over take me down the south 1/2 of Peckham Rye. Very purposefully he gunned around me slammed in front braked hard and stopped at his next pick-up. Poor him (and long suffering you lot) he didn't kill me or knock me off my bike. His job unfortunately made me the "winner" of his lethal game. In a city, a cyclist enjoying the fresh air and great outdoors, more often than not leaves a driver with many horses beneath his bonnet in the dust.

Glad to hear that he's alive - I thought he was under it


All the buses had stopped and everyone from the shops was on the street as I walked up.


titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kenand Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > titch juicy Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Cyclist and bus had a coming together outside

> > > peckham rye station this morning apparently.

> > Only

> > > details I know are that he wasn't wearing a

> > helmet

> > > and there was a crowd of paramedics present.

> >

> > He was wearing a helmet and looked in a bad way

>

> apologies- typo on my part, meant to write he WAS

> wearing a helmet and it probably saved his life

>

> this is very much anecdotal though

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> my old Dad used to always ask pavement cyclists if

> they did it because their Mum wouldn't let them

> cycle on the road.


I do that sometimes, in fact I did it a few days ago. I think he told me to 'buck off front' though I may have misheard him.

kenand Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> He was wearing a helmet and looked in a bad way


He did have a helmet, my sympathies to the guy, hope he's okay now - he was in a lot of pain.


As far as I could see (was also cycling, but a lot further up the road) he came off near a slow moving or stationary bus, but I don't think that caused the accident. It looked like he either collided with the bin lorry flanking the bus, or possibly a person stepped out in front of him. I heard the noise before looking so missed the split second of the collision.

a fish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Today's @$$holes. Number 2 nearly clipped me, and

> is cycling past a sign saying 'cyclists dismount'.


Nobody around - seems safe enough to me.


I do think this thread has been going on long enough, surely these pictures are a sign we need to stop.


On to more interesting topics I think.


Now, how is that M&S coming on at Iceland site????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...