Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey


We are renting our flat out soon and will be looking to have a deep clean done before we get the tenants in, does anyone know what is included in it? Are we talking carpets? Skirting boards? Oven? windows? it is a really simple and small flat with mainly wooden floors and white walls (will be unfurnished) so not talking a massive amount of hard work but just trying to work out what we need to get done without spending a fortune.

What is the difference between a professional deep cleaning company and just using normal cleaners for a bit longer?


Thanks!

I think the difference is how sterile a finish you're ordering. When people talk about 'deep cleaning' I think of hospitals and catering kitchens.


However, getting the flat clean is the right thing to do. I wish the rental agencies were as good as their word. They promise absentee landlords to get places properly done between tenants. We have noticed they do the very least they can get away with. University accomodation is often a disgrace.


What if the place housed people who carried TB, Hepatitis, HIV, etc?


Careful landlords recoup the cost of deep cleaning by writing it into each tenancy agreement. Tenant arrives to a spotless place, and signs the agreement knowing there'll be one charge for a cleaning firm hired to do the carpets at the end of the contract. This can be non-negotiable.


Steam-cleaning is good for tiled floors and carpets. Curtains & sofa covers -> laundrette service wash, or dry cleaners. Bathroom and kitchen should be, well, germ free - tiled walls & ceilings as well as the suite. London water makes regular lime scale removal worthwhile.

A professional would take your order & arrange all this for you, plus clean things like mirrors and windows and skylights, lampshades & light switches, plugs and handles, the fridge, oven and hob and drains, front doorsteps and bins.


Cheapie firms: a warning. 'Normal' cleaners are sometimes people whose passports are being held by a middleman while they work for peanuts in this ideal, hidden, black-economy job, paying off those who smuggled them in.

fl0wer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ....When people talk about 'deep

> cleaning' I think of hospitals and catering

> kitchens.


Whereas I think of discretion.


But deep cleaners also have equipment for what are politely termed "specialist" tasks. So it depends what, exactly, you want got rid of. Here are some questions that might help the OP decide:


1) Are you particularly ashamed of your grubbiness? Although most of us can tolerate a surprising quantity of filth, landlords, naturally, tend not to. Whether this is because they wish to avoid the basilisk glower of lettings agents, who are professionally withering at the best of times, or simply because they calculate that a bout of outsourced scrubbery can be both claimed against tax and rooked back from tenants, is a moot point.


2) Have you any communicable diseases that your tenants might catch without their prior consent?


3) Is the vermin more exotic than the normal stuff (fleas, bedbugs, dust mites, weevils, silverfish, woodlice, black fungus, rats and/or mice)?


4) Have you ever smoked, kept a pet or been in contact with anyone who has done either? Although I don't think any landlords have yet been sued for inadvertent allergens or third-hand smoke, it's only a matter of time.


5) Is there anything, or anyone, you've done that might have left traces you'd prefer not to be found? There's a range of substances - DNA, fingerprints, bodily fluids and certain unfortunate solids - that, though a natural and normal feature of rented accommodation, can become problematic if you have tenants that ask questions, bear grudges or both. Unfortunately, forensic science (or the courts' willingness to fall for it) has moved on by leaps and bounds, so you can no longer reliably pretend it's a wine stain or a special sort of caulk.


If the answer to any of the above is 'yes' (as this is a public forum, it's best you keep the answers to yourself) then a discreet, professional, deep-cleaning company might be what you need. I am no expert, however, so you should check with your insurance and legal advisors if you're still in any doubt.


Question 5, incidentally, may not be relevant. It depends on where you're going to be living in the meantime. If it's somewhere like Holloway, then I doubt you'll need to worry. But if you're heading for the sunshine of, say, Ecuador, you'll not want anything to interfere with the natural flow of rent.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...