Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I thought they were legit too.


It was a young man who came to my house tonight - I didn't see any others.


However I object to being approached by chuggers in the street, let alone in my own home, and I particularly didn't welcome them knocking on my door after dark (8.30pm), even though he was perfectly polite.

If you want to give to Cancer Research, or any other charity for that matter, DO NOT SIGN UP WITH A CHUGGER. Instead, Google the charity of your choice, go to their home-page, and sign up directly with the charity. Why should chuggers cream a percentage off the top of your donations? Give direct. If you've already signed up then cancel that standing order and do a new one that goes direct.

I seem to be getting people from various charities several times a week and often when I've just got our baby to bed. It drives me mad and I find it really intrusive. I respond that I pay via the payroll which I do and it's far more beneficial to both the charity and to me to do it that way. I was furious on Sunday when they knocked at 2pm - surely if a family is every going to have Sunday lunch together it would be then.


In addition to this I've also had a guy selling cloths etc. this week..... Several friends have found the constant door knocking really intimidating particularly when it's in the evening and they're home alone. Is there any way we can stop it?

LadyNorwood Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've got a camera on my front door which is linked

> to my TV so I can see who is at the door.....

> Also, if I'm not expecting anyone I won't answer

> the door after dark....



That sounds interesting. Was it expensive? Does it need a cable, or does it work remotely?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The driver was male he was on a mobile No one was hurt l. Complete dick
    • Surely the question is whether James Mcash is effective in his various roles? I've seen nothing to suggest otherwise as a GG councillor or cabinet member. No idea about the teaching but he's made a career of it, so one would think he's perfectly fine on that front too. What I do object to is him being elected under one banner and hopping under another one, I suspect out of naked self interest. His headline rationale for the move is scarcely credible. He claims "the council was “planning for funding gaps larger than those faced in almost every year of Conservative and Liberal Democrat austerity, this time imposed by a Labour government...Unless something changes, Labour cuts will devastate the local services that as residents of this fantastic borough, we all rely on.” But what he's actually talking about here is the new Fair Funding Review, undertaken by notorious Tories Angela Rayner and Jim McMahon.   https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-fair-funding-review-20/the-fair-funding-review-20 The Fair Funding Review is explicitly about the redistribution of resources based on updated needs assessment, which, last time I looked was a key tenet of the left (including the Greens). Mcash also claims Southwark "cannot and does not stand up the the government" but that simply isn't the case as Southwark, Lambeth and London Councils have objected to the FFR because it fails to take into account Londoners' high housing costs. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/news/2025/southwark-and-lambeth-leaders-call-fair-funding  He seems high on bluster and low on actual detail. And the great problem Greens have to overcome, like everyone else, is that the country has no money.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...