Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Due to widespread discontent with Royal Mail (late, delayed and disappearing post), a local consortium of businesspersons is starting a competing service for local mail in the London area.

Starting 1 April and for a trial period of 2 weeks any mail posted to an address in Greater London, will be delivered free of charge providing CITY MAIL is written in the top right corner of the envelope. In East Dulwich, please post in the GREEN postbox outside William Rose at 126, Lordship Lane.

After this period stamps will be available to prepay postage at approximately half the rate of Royal Mail stamps

Contact City Mail (London) at [email protected] for more information.

 

April Fools

Edited by Joe
April fools
  • Haha 1

This is interesting and I wish the service well.  But the biggest problem appears mostly to be with incoming mail which gets as far as the sorting office and then appears to be only randomly delivered to final destinations in East Dulwich.  Is City Mail able to help with this?

  • Agree 1

Agreed that there has been little evidence of problems with collection, the problem lies with the ED Delivery Office and its removal to Peckham. This is the office which is tragically under-staffed and poorly managed. Very few of the letters sent to me seem to originate in Central London, and this service will thus not benefit me that much. 

  • Agree 1

Despite the date (and the fact that starting up such a service would likely be illegal) an earlier post, in March, and thus presumably not date related, suggested problems with collection as well as delivery. I had thought to discount this whatever the seasonal intention of the OP.

What's wrong with spaghetti trees?  I understand that the conditions are ideal for a good harvest.  When I was younger I'd spend a couple of weeks in Italy helping with the harvest before moving onto pick grapes in vineyards.  I'd urge youngsters to do similar, for example during the school and university summer holidays 

  • Joe changed the title to Alternative to Royal Mail (April Fools)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi Hillbilly, Your obviously correct that the committee members must consider the scheme in the context of planning laws, Southwark Policy documents. Those policy documents are clear the site should be considered suburban. As a Councillor when this was decided I can assure we considered this site and all others in the then East dulwich Ward and the Dulwich Community Council area. Ignoring that as the officer report does unconvincingly in my view would be a poor decision. The officer report states I believe highly inflated economic benefit of students to help justify the scheme. I have a student currently and they really don't have the sums being talked about and nor do their network for friends.  The council officers report states students will move in at the academic yea start over two weekends/4 days. 360 students will suggest worst case 360 cars. Unlikely to be perfectly balanced hence 50-100 vehicles per day.  The proposed building top 2-3 floors look like metal cladding and not the local vernacular of bricks and tiled roofs. The top two stories and roof enclosures will be invisible for some distance. I don't think it unreasonable to call that out of character for the area. I think it would be hard to argue it would be in keeping.  Yes, we have a housing crisis. But we have falling student numbers. The site could be used for more regular homes that the proposed 53. Southwark has the highest number of unoccupied homes for a borough. Southwark Council fixing that and they have plenty of powers to really dent those figures.  The development will have a huge negative impact on the neighbouring streets in dominance of the proposed structures parking pressures, etc. Your username suggests you wont be one of those affected. Nor will I directly. But I hate to see injustice from a poorly thought through scheme. If you feel strongly you could attend the Planning Committee Tonight as supporter.   Hi malibu, Far from. The homes completed on Bassano and Hindmans were sites I proposed to the council for them consider for new council homes. I have campaigned for the council to approve schemes with 35% social housing for many years. I dare not comment on people football team :-0 Hi the-permit, Southwark has zoning for density to protect the character of areas and to protect peoples confidence to move into, purchase and live and put down roots in areas. East Dulwich is under Southwark planning rules suburban. In the north of the borough the density rules are much higher.
    • So you are against affordable rents and ownership for those on low incomes, key workers etc.  Who is going to clean our buildings, serve in our shops, and look after us when we are old or ill? Some state intervention, particularly social housing, extremely welcome.  Sorry if I have misquoted you. Meanwhile with the quality of football I'm surprised that DHFC aren't considering relocating to Peckham Town FC.  
    • https://ukfoundations.co/ They highlight the most important economic fact about modern Britain: that it is difficult to build almost anything, anywhere. This prevents investment, increases energy costs, and makes it harder for productive economic clusters to expand. This, in turn, lowers our productivity, incomes, and tax revenues. In many cases today, as many of 40 percent of a new development’s homes must be subsidised for ‘affordable’ renters instead of being made available at market rates. These requirements function as a tax on new housing (and so local objectors often support them), redistributing income from every other private tenant to a lucky few. Countries with expensive rental housing also see movements for rent controls, and punitive rental regulations, like giving every tenant the permanent right to live in the property they occupy.
    • We also havent been getting any letters, this happens so often and its so frustrating 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...