Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's a hilarious quote from a local estate agent (Mr Wooster of Wooster and Stock) in today's Sunday Times. Without a hint of irony he says: 'It's frightening - I don't know where we're going.....People are getting greedy - it's bringing out the worst in them.'

*jimmyraj* I like your Mr Wooster quote! It's unfortunate that our attitude to our homes seems to involve viewing them as cash cows instead of, well, homes. And don't get me started on the smugness of some of my friends who bought in Peckham Rye back in about 2006 and have seen the value of their homes almost double in some cases, through no skill of their own, just by being able to buy at that time in that area.


There are still some reasonably priced places around Nunhead if you're prepared to take on some work and live with dated decor for a while until you can afford to fix it.

The value of my house (Peckham) has doubled in eight years. I can't see how it's worth what it's "worth".


In the twenty odd years i've been in London, I've always been forced to move into less salubrious areas to buy the property I want. Invariably these have then become popular and the house prices have soared accordingly (including now with Peckham). There is still a lot of value in places like Catford, Lewisham, Forest Hill, and so on for around ?200k.

Well we've left East Dulwich (renting) to move to Catford (buying). We did look around the area's surrounding, but either just couldn't afford it, or there seemed to be very poor value. (size, condition, storage space, standard of fitting out etc)

Blackcurrant Wrote:


> November to December is the best time to pick up

> bargains. The dark evenings make everything look

> less appealing and people are distracted by

> Christmas, so demand is lower and prices are a

> touch softer, usually.

>

> I think the second phase of help to buy will be

> watered down until it becomes irrelevant, as it's

> a totally stupid idea. But Osborne can't do a

> U-turn at the moment without looking daft, so

> don't expect any announcement. Same situation

> applies to the governor of the Bank of England who

> has set himself up to look like an idiot over

> forward guidance.

>

> Mortgage rates might creep up next year. Even so,

> London keeps pulling people in and not enough is

> being built, so prices here are never going to be

> cheap.

>

> If SE London gets too expensive, have a look at

> the ends of Crossrail, e.g. from Acton to

> Reading/Maidenhead. The commute from those areas

> to the City will drop substantially, which should

> push up prices faster than the rest of London.


Thanks for this... quite a few estate agents told us on Saturday that August was a terrible month for new properties coming onto the market but they've been instructed to value quite a few in the last week or two so we should start seeing a few more potential's soon. It was quite reassuring actually, most estate agents told us we'd have no problem finding what we want, it's just a bit of a waiting game. Makes a change from some of the less-respectable estate agents (bottle of Perrier anyone?) who seem to want to scare us into thinking we have to move way out of the area to get anything near our budget.


I don't think we'll need to do anything as extreme as head towards the Crossrail links to be honest... if we can't buy in SE15/SE22, our second choice is Deptford/New Cross, and there are still a pretty decent amount of properties available in that area.


Girl82 - we have indeed considered the Queens Road area, but similarly to the rest of SE15, barely any properties have come onto the market in the last month or so.

A house near me on Barry Road has been in the process of renovations for over a year now. It's on the market for 1.1 million. On Barry bloody Road! It has 6 bedrooms, a cinema room and a 2 TVs in the bathroom (one in the shower and one at the end of the bath, apparently) but if I had 1.1 million pounds I would NOT be spending it on Barry Road. I really hope they don't get the asking price.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You'd have to be on some sort of illegal substance

> to pay over a million quid for a house anywhere in

> SE London other than Dulwich Village. True story.

>

>

> Louisa.



Posh houses around Blackheath must go for a bomb. Went to a few parties in such houses as a teenager, and they are huge!

The government surely now has to cancel the second part of Help to Buy planned for January. It's impact has been to push prices up further so it's not helping anyone, especially those who need it most. I find it all very depressing.


I've said it before, but things are out of control and this is another temporary debt fueled bubble. Interest rates are at a 300 year low. And when they rise (as they surely will) anyone with say a ?450k mortgage or higher will stick a minimum of ?1000+ per month onto their mortgage on a 4% rise in rates.


There are plenty new buyers now who've forgotten what 5-7% rates feel like....

"Maybe inching up 0.25% a year over a period of several years."


well, that was also the thinking people had back in the early 90s. I know times are different etc etc but I wouldn't be betting on such a gradual incline either

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The government surely now has to cancel the second

> part of Help to Buy planned for January. It's

> impact has been to push prices up further so it's

> not helping anyone, especially those who need it

> most. I find it all very depressing.



I see your point, but it's still the only chance a family like mine has to claw our way on to the bottom rung of the ladder somewhere not particularly local. Rochester looks nice...

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well, that was also the thinking people had back in the early 90s.


To be pedantic... rates actually fell in the early 90s, it was the late 80s when rates rocketed from 9ish to 15ish over 2 years. But even then, there'd been a long history of rates at around the 10% mark. And proportionately, it was much less of a shock than a sudden rise from say 0.5% to 4% would be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
    • The situation outside Oru is far worse with their large tables immediately adjacent to badly parked bikes using the bike racks there. And the lamppost also blocking the pavement.
    • Urgently looking for a garage in SE London - Brockley, Crofton Park, Catford, Lewisham, Honor Oak, Dulwich, Forest Hill, Sydenham, Deptford, New Cross, Hither Green or Lee would all work. Willing to pay market rent. Must be available long term. Please call Andrew on 07740 339669 if you have one available.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...