Melbourne Grove South CPZ consultation

[geh]

5 minutes ago, malumbu said:

I cycle there. 

I don’t think that’s entirely correct, and how about imposing your views on those who do live in that location, or is it ok because you live there (part time) which you don’t in the current consultation area?

Edited Saturday at 22:47 by geh
Spelling

[first mate]

11 hours ago, malumbu said:

I cycle there. 

Hmm, I am sure you do cycle when you are 'there'; you are an exceedingly keen cyclist. But, do you really cycle door to door, each time, that is to the ferry terminals and train stations either side, or to airports? Perhaps you do, but your part of France is a good way. If so, good on you; it is wonderful you enjoy the fitness, health and time to make that journey each way.

Back on thread, I was not quoting you in terms of asserting people should move house if they are not close enough to their workplace to cycle. That was someone different, but someone else very involved with LCC/Southwark Cyclists.

In terms of the current Melbourne CPZ consultation, I was taken aback that the large development planned for land to the back of Charter and adjacent to Melbourne Grove, includes plans for car parking. I do not personally object to that but it seems at odds with the council's declared aspiration to rid the area of cars. Perhaps I misread the plans- I did skim.

[march46]

Where does it say it includes car parking?

[first mate]

I used the link provided in the development thread and found the link to the development and it was there is the first para, if I recall. I may have misread it. 
 

Suggest this is pursued in relevant thread in main section and keep this focused on the CPZ consultation. I have also commented in the other thread.

Edited Sunday at 11:14 by first mate