Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, jazzer said:

Exactly, the cycle lane was an excuse to slow traffic, it's unnecessary because it's never used, never seen one cyclist cycle along there, EVER, EVER. It is an excuse to solve another problem.  

It's meant to slow the traffic.  Narrows the road, so naturally slows the traffic.  That is because before it was a race track up to the cameras.  Much nicer now.

Yeo, it slows journey times, its a road designed to move traffic along it at 30mph, reduced by a clown to 20mph, creating greater levels of pollution as a result. And don't argue ulez or cpz or ltn's all designed to purely make money schemes. Why have road tax then???????????

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

The road is often gridlocked due to cars now being able to park thus reducing the whole road to one lane for both directions buses are often getting stuck - and if a cyclist happens to use the cycle lane the council throws a party for them when they reach the other end....such is the rarity of such an event. That whole road is now a festering relic to the whole botched active travel experiment- the very best visual reminder of the ludicrous approach taken by our council as they waste tax payers money to satiate the demands of the cycle lobby.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

I see that Southwark cyclists website says cycling in the borough is lower than average, which is an interesting admission, given the amounts being spent on infrastructure.

March, you are right, I am reposting this elsewhere.

Edited by first mate
10 hours ago, Rockets said:

The road is often gridlocked due to cars now being able to park thus reducing the whole road to one lane for both directions buses are often getting stuck - and if a cyclist happens to use the cycle lane the council throws a party for them when they reach the other end....such is the rarity of such an event. That whole road is now a festering relic to the whole botched active travel experiment- the very best visual reminder of the ludicrous approach taken by our council as they waste tax payers money to satiate the demands of the cycle lobby.

Have you even read the traffic management order for it? Clearly not.

What were you banned for?

  • Agree 1

I got suspended for calling someone out for using the death of an engineer as a personal jibe. I should of learnt a lesson from some sage advice a rugby coach once gave me - it's not the player who throws the first punch that gets yellow-carded it's the player who retaliates. I think admin deemed me repeating my accusation against said poster for using the death of someone as a personal jibe as too much - fair enough - admin sets the rules....I did plead my innocence but got no response so I served my time (for a crime I didn't commit!!! ;-))

Snowy, yup you're right - invariably the person who retaliates get punished not the person who threw the first punch! Lessons learned and all that - and certainly I will be stickler for obeying the rules to the letter now - also acutely aware that there are probably some who will go out of their way to try to get people banned to silence dissenting voices in the debate!!

Probably good advice to everyone else to follow the rules for fear suspensions etc get issued to them.

45 minutes ago, Penguin68 said:

Mal, you do seem desparate to trivialise what are clearly disruptive and poorly planned and managed roadworks, implemented with no thought or care for the road users and tax payers. 

Yeah, would want to know which part of Dulwich this individual lives in - or even if it is a real person 🤔

Edited by ab29
1 hour ago, Penguin68 said:

Mal, you do seem desparate to trivialise what are clearly disruptive and poorly planned and managed roadworks, implemented with no thought or care for the road users and tax payers. 

Passed there today on the bus.

There were people working on them, and no apparent disruption to traffic.

The road being dug up outside ED station seemed to be causing much worse problems when I passed on Monday.

12 hours ago, Rockets said:

What work are they doing outside ED station? Another route in and out of Dulwich disrupted...it's becoming a badly organised joke.

It's very annoying as they actually did a good job of working on resurfacing the road there over a series of nights to minimise disruption, only to finish and then start digging up another bit during the day. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...