Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 28/02/2025 at 13:16, granadaland said:

Rules in the window of the bishop today.

gone full suburbs.

IMG_8222.jpeg

Expand  

That is SO naff!! I never go there but still....

It almost makes me want to turn up dressed like 'Honey G' in full on shell suit look accesorised  with a hard hat and a pair of paint spattered workboots just in order for this to 'sedate' 65year old to tell them they need to get a grip or move to Orpington when they tell me I'm not 'suitably attired' and therefore cannot enter their establishment.

Edited by NewWave
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/357879-the-bishop/#findComment-1699080
Share on other sites

It is a bit provincial.  I assume it is a way to keep out groups who have caused trouble in the past if they need to?  I doubt middle aged ladies turning up in trainers and a hoodie are going to be turned away.

You do sometimes see those signs in central London pubs, usually on football derby days or ones near construction sites.    On the latter I am not sure if builders are particularltly badly behaved in pubs or if they think their more middle class clientele would be offended by the sight of a load of blokes in work boots and plaster spattered trousers. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/357879-the-bishop/#findComment-1699096
Share on other sites

To be fair, anyone wearing a hard hat & tool belt after 8 pm is either seven Stellas into a post-site session or a member of a Village People tribute band. Neither is particularly appealing.

The hat/hood thing is pretty commonplace in loads of places now, not just Bromley - it's for CCTV.

They've had a few problems in there in the past, you can see why they've had to make some changes. 

Strangely enough, curing the gents of the pong probably won't have helped. You could barely go in there without holding your breath, let alone take a great, big nasal draught of something.

Edited by David Peckham
Sp.
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/357879-the-bishop/#findComment-1699103
Share on other sites

 

Along with actress it was sold to GK.

Going back further it was part of Scott's chain. The actress (formerly uplands) was named to go with "actress and bishop ".

It got the name Bishop to match Castle in Camberwell. 

Before that Foresters Arms.

This thread may help or confuse https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10052-the-uplands-to-becomelounged/#comment-297733

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/357879-the-bishop/#findComment-1699367
Share on other sites

  On 03/03/2025 at 16:31, OutOfFocus said:

 

Along with actress it was sold to GK.

Going back further it was part of Scott's chain. The actress (formerly uplands) was named to go with "actress and bishop ".

It got the name Bishop to match Castle in Camberwell. 

Before that Foresters Arms.

This thread may help or confuse https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10052-the-uplands-to-becomelounged/#comment-297733

Expand  

There was a competition to name the old Uplands when it was taken over by the person  who owned the Bishop,  and "The Actress" won for obvious reasons 🤣

The Foresters was vile (in my opinion).

I'm interested that there are still problems with the smell from the Gents, because in the Foresters days you could smell it as soon as you went in, and my memory is that  it felt like you were squelching your way over the carpet, though I'm sure that can't have been true 🤣

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/357879-the-bishop/#findComment-1699393
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not with all the bins currently stored there.
    • We both own the freehold. They’re in the maisonette and I’m in the flat. They’re older, so with any luck, they’ll be selling soon. Unfortunately, due to recent events, all of this now has to be disclosed on the TA6 form. Honestly, I’d move out of sheer shame if I were them. Poisoning fruit trees planted for children is just cruel, and they haven’t even apologised. I genuinely wonder how they justify this to themselves. Envy is such a toxic and destructive emotion, and sadly, it often explains behaviour like this. I just wanted to say how grateful I am for the support from so many of you, especially at the East Dulwich Forum drinks and for the kind messages on both this forum and the Nextdoor app. It’s genuinely reassuring to know there are still decent, supportive neighbours around.
    • Hmm, you seem to have an agenda.  I like ait of measured that they have done to promote active travel, improving pedestrian and cyclist safety, whilst improving the streetscape. I avoid making sweeping statements about wildlife management as I don't know enough about their policies, and expect some in Southwark are passionate about what they do. Go along to a relevant local meeting and ask, I doubt if you will change a thing by posting here.  
    • It wouldn't surprise me at all.   The council used to spray the pavements all the time b4 lockdown.  They are probably doing it again.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...