Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sounds as expected and obviously firmly catering towards the middle classes who can afford to drop £80 on a meal for 2 with a round of drinks without breaking a sweat.

I dont suppose they have an affordable lager for those who dont fit into the above group? 

Do they have a pram/buggy park like they do at a creche? As that would come in handy im sure. 

Its a shame because going back before covid it was still an affordable pub, mostly used by drinkers. 

52 minutes ago, PickledPorcupine said:

Sounds as expected and obviously firmly catering towards the middle classes who can afford to drop £80 on a meal for 2 with a round of drinks without breaking a sweat.

I dont suppose they have an affordable lager for those who dont fit into the above group? 

Do they have a pram/buggy park like they do at a creche? As that would come in handy im sure. 

Its a shame because going back before covid it was still an affordable pub, mostly used by drinkers. 

They always used to have at least one (relatively) low priced ale on.

Don't know about lager.

And to be fair, if you are running this kind of  business, and the local demographic has changed around you, you have to allow for that or your business is going to fail.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 5
10 minutes ago, Sue said:

They always used to have at least one (relatively) low priced ale on.

Don't know about lager.

And to be fair, if you are running this kind of  business, and the local demographic has changed around you, you have to allow for that or your business is going to fail.

That was when Antic ran it. For all their faults, they did have an in house policy of always having at least 1 lager and ale on tap that was affordable, and i dont know if anyone noticed (unlikely around East Dulwich as prices are rarely an issue here) but they always priced a dish of sausages and mash at an affordable price, around £8. The idea was that even those without wealth could still come to the pub and have a meal and pint. 

I doubt that'll be the case now, with a new Pubco who own pubs in places like Bank, Fitzrovia, Clerkenwell and Highate Village. 

54 minutes ago, nivag said:

An £8 meal ain't exactly affordable IMO if you're on low income.

It used to be cheaper, before inflation. And maybe even people on a low income are allowed to treat themselves with a meal in a pub from time to time. 

And its certainly more affordable than the £17 the Cherry Tree charges. 

Edited by PickledPorcupine
1 hour ago, Insuflo said:

If you fancy an affordable lager, head to Watson’s General Telegraph on Forest Hill Road. I forget the name of it but a 4% lager, brewed in east London somewhere: £8.20 a pint. Form an orderly queue…

My least favourite pub on the planet, and there are some awful places out there.  I'll give it a miss.

7 hours ago, PickledPorcupine said:

 i dont know if anyone noticed (unlikely around East Dulwich as prices are rarely an issue here) but they always priced a dish of sausages and mash at an affordable price, around £8. The idea was that even those without wealth could still come to the pub and have a meal and pint.  

Their sausage and mash was an absolute bargain in the days when they did a really good veggie sausage and gravy.

Then they got a new chef.

The veggie sausages (I assume bought in, and from a different - presumably cheaper - source)  became absolutely disgusting, verging on inedible.

So no longer a bargain.

If you are looking for a bargain lunch, head to Chern Thai, near the station.

Lunchtime special 12 -3 Monday to Friday.

£9 for a main, £12 for main plus starter. Thai lager on draft. 

Very nice food and lovely people.

10 hours ago, malumbu said:

 It had a certain decrepit charm before. I'm sure it will be more profitable but I am less likely to visit.  Pub sign is awful.... In my opinion. 

Sadly The Palmerston has (imo) gone the same way.

A gradual deterioration from the quirky charm it once had to a bland sort of corporate style and (imo) a horrid font for the pub name over the door outside  and terrible (imo) art inside (apologies if you are one of the artists, but I understand the art was shipped in by the pubco).

Tastes differ, obviously, but it all sets my teeth on edge.

In one of its incarnations, it used to have regularly  changing art displays by local artists. These  were much more interesting and engaging, and if one particular set were not to your personal taste, at least they weren't there permanently.

I will still continue to go there, because the manager and the staff are lovely. The changes aren't their fault, and I'm sure the pub will do well, because - as with the EDT - it is presumably meeting what research has shown the present East Dulwich residents want.

ETA: To be fair, some of the most recent changes have been an improvement, eg changing some of the  lighting to fit in better with its surroundings.

Edited by Sue

A few of us went to the reopened EDT on Wednesday and opinion was mixed. Plus points - opening the upstairs room permanently (unless there's a function); generally good decor; better furniture (no more wobbly school chairs). Minus points - the prices are up about 10-15% on pre-closure; the food offering is underwhelming and overpriced. Having said that, I never went there to eat - well, the occasional bowl of chips - and I've been going since the late 90s.

I fear that the 'mixed' pub of the past in our area is a thing of the past - out of the price range of 'ordinary' people, though things have been heading that way in any case. Pubs as interesting, mixed social spaces in much of London are fast disappearing and there's probably not much the new owners could have done to turn that tide.

  • Agree 1

Thanks Ianr and Jenijenjen.

So from what Ianr has found, it has been the EDT since at least 1990, so I don't know why the new owners should have put 1999 on it (unless I misread it - I was over the road).

At least my memory is correct, as I was sure it was the EDT when I moved here in  1991!

24 minutes ago, Sue said:

Thanks Ianr and Jenijenjen.

So from what Ianr has found, it has been the EDT since at least 1990, so I don't know why the new owners should have put 1999 on it (unless I misread it - I was over the road).

At least my memory is correct, as I was sure it was the EDT when I moved here in  1991!

It was EDT probably even before then, we did the comedy, and this had been there already for a number of years.  It was the East Dulwich Comedy then, the wiki entry says 1988, but before then I think the comedy went as "Off the Tube" "or South of the River at this time of night mate" (cabbies apparently said this) or names along those lines.  

 

  • 5 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
    • The situation outside Oru is far worse with their large tables immediately adjacent to badly parked bikes using the bike racks there. And the lamppost also blocking the pavement.
    • Urgently looking for a garage in SE London - Brockley, Crofton Park, Catford, Lewisham, Honor Oak, Dulwich, Forest Hill, Sydenham, Deptford, New Cross, Hither Green or Lee would all work. Willing to pay market rent. Must be available long term. Please call Andrew on 07740 339669 if you have one available.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...