Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Monday 17th February: 2 - 4 pm

This focused two-hour revision session is designed to strengthen key skills for GCSE Physics Paper 1, covering:

 
 6-Mark Prose Questions – Techniques to structure extended responses clearly, using key terms and phrases 
 Formula Mastery – Understanding and applying combinations of equations, identifying key variables, and improving accuracy in calculations by noting prefixes and units 
 Required Practical Plans – A checklist to ensure required practicals plans meet the level 3 (5-6 mark) standard every time

Students will work through past paper questions, refine their exam technique, and gain confidence in applying knowledge effectively. The session is interactive, ensuring active participation and clear takeaways for revision using Pencil Spaces software for the online classroom.

Visit my website for more information and to book a space. 

https://www.physicswithkate.com/gcse-ph ... ses-online

🎯 Limited Places – 3 places left. 

Timings and Cost

  • Mon 17th 2 pm - 4 pm
  • 2 hours revision and a pdf of all the questions (and answers) that we'll cover in the session for £50
  • Max 6 students in the session


Find Out More
 

 

 

 

2hr feb half term gcse phsyics v3.png

Edited by KPL123
update attachment image
  • KPL123 changed the title to Struggling with Physics GCSE - 2hr Online Feb Half-Term Revision Session

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • On what basis do you object to the economy spend numbers in the report and describe it as "extremely unlikely"? Is that objection based on data or is it vibes-based? Where does this estimate of "50-100 vehicles" come from? The objectors:supporters ratio doesn't speak volumes. Planning applications of this sort always receive objections from various curtain twitches and NIMBYs. It doesn't mean those objections are well-founded or sensible. The planning officers and councillors need to consider the issue objectively, not just count the letters. It's not a public vote. Saying the building is "out of character" is meaningless out of context. It's an unusual building on an unusual infill site. It's not supposed to be a model for future development across Dulwich as a whole.  We are in the middle of a housing crisis. London desperately needs more housing units. This is an opportunity to get a whole bunch of them on a small, unloved industrial site on top of a transit hub. Not building it because people like the Dulwich Society complains it's "visible" is crazy.
    • Not if someone wheels over it with a pram or a heavy footed person steps on it and it hasn't been tied up or is tied but explodes everywhere. Yuk! Agree we definitely need dog poo bins back again, particularly near Peckham Rye park, along Crystal Palace Road, and by Goose Green.
    • I would also like to thank James Barber for his full outline. Given what seem to be clear mistakes in interpretation of the plans by Southwark Council planning officers, there seems to have been a lack of due diligence. 
    • Many charity shops still take and sell CDs! Many people buy them! Locally, both the Mind shop and the Vision shop sell CDs. Possibly others who I've forgotten.  If memory serves, the Oxfam shop in Herne Hill does as well, though it sells them at a higher price than most charity shops. My partner is constantly looking through charity shop CDs, and delighted when he finds music he likes! Please don't bin them!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...