Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MelbourneGr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Take Clive for example - he goes off on

> one when challenged, clearly annoyed by this, the

> man is probably getting into a lather in front of

> his LCD PC screen. I usually link that kind of

> behaviour to bratty kids...


Well fair enough. :)-D


Its not every day I get called a racist and a liar because I dont go to some of the shops in the area I live in...

"So no one can say they don't go Peckham Rye because it smells or its dirty - it just makes me wonder what the real reason is"


Er, you've just answered your own question.


If I go to Peckham it's because I have to - to get a train as the links are good, Argos for electrical/household appliances and for some ?2 thongs from Primark!! However, it's not somewhere you'd go just for a stroll as that high street is so bloody depressing.


Unlike Rye Lane, I do not need a reason to go to Lordship Lane. I can happily walk about, sit outside and have a coffee/drink/something to eat without the smell of rotting meat and littered pavements. Am sure most people will agree and it doesn't make us all racists.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

It's just a fact that in the last decade or

> so, Rye Lane has gone down hill and is now rough

> and, in parts, smells a bit grim.


So we're all in agreement then: Rye Lane is dirty and it smells*


*Like lots of other places in London but then we're not talking about them we're talking about Rye Lane.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> It's just a fact that in the last decade or

> > so, Rye Lane has gone down hill and is now

> rough

> > and, in parts, smells a bit grim.

>

> So we're all in agreement then: Rye Lane is dirty

> and it smells*

>

> *Like lots of other places in London but then

> we're not talking about them we're talking about

> Rye Lane.


yes, Southwark Council should 'Febreze' it!

>

In my opinion not that dodgy. I think that you were extremely unlucky to have witnessed the amount of street drug activity in such a short time. Though I think on first visits to an area one tends to be a bit twitchy. I'm sure that if you made a few repeat visits you would feel more relaxed walking the streets. Saying that it's hardly a drug free zone. My nine year old was having a yard sale in the area with a friend when they were approached by two men whom she described "as very skinny with missing teeth and spots" who asked if they could "borrow" a tenner, so it certainly ain't the mythical land of estateagenteese. If you had made your visit on a Sunday morning on the other hand you may have got an entirely different impression as the streets are populated by the devout, besuited, behatted or in traditional dress. In short I'd say it's a diverse area and the main quality you'll need to make a life there is an open mind.

Apologies for any personal comments I made.


I still think Peckham is a nice area. Also agree it can be rough - especially the north part where you have gangs. Bellenden area is fine.


There is always the bus to Blackfriers from Honor Oak- but it takes forever.


JJF - I never implied that anyone was racist - just making that clear


Keef - I wouldn't go as far as Sydenham to compare houses, the houses there are whack.

jumpinjackflash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "So no one can say they don't go Peckham Rye

> because it smells or its dirty - it just makes me

> wonder what the real reason is"

>

> Er, you've just answered your own question.

>

> If I go to Peckham it's because I have to - to get

> a train as the links are good, Argos for

> electrical/household appliances and for some ?2

> thongs from Primark!! However, it's not somewhere

> you'd go just for a stroll as that high street is

> so bloody depressing.

>

> Unlike Rye Lane, I do not need a reason to go to

> Lordship Lane. I can happily walk about, sit

> outside and have a coffee/drink/something to eat

> without the smell of rotting meat and littered

> pavements. Am sure most people will agree and it

> doesn't make us all racists.


Here Here and Here again JJF....

MadWorld74 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jumpinjackflash Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "So no one can say they don't go Peckham Rye

> > because it smells or its dirty - it just makes

> me

> > wonder what the real reason is"

> >

> > Er, you've just answered your own question.

> >

> > If I go to Peckham it's because I have to - to

> get

> > a train as the links are good, Argos for

> > electrical/household appliances and for some ?2

> > thongs from Primark!! However, it's not

> somewhere

> > you'd go just for a stroll as that high street

> is

> > so bloody depressing.

> >

> > Unlike Rye Lane, I do not need a reason to go

> to

> > Lordship Lane. I can happily walk about, sit

> > outside and have a coffee/drink/something to

> eat

> > without the smell of rotting meat and littered

> > pavements. Am sure most people will agree and

> it

> > doesn't make us all racists.

>

> Here Here and Here again JJF....



is that here, here - meaning east dulwich?


this thread really is a bore with people on both sides running the opposing arguments to illogical extremes, (deliberately?) misinterpreting eachother and speaking on behalf to too many others rather than just themselves - e.g. 'not somewhere YOU'D go' above whereas they mean 'not somewhere I'D go' and 'MOST people would agree' when they mean 'MOST people I KNOW would agree'


is racism a part of it? i dunno, but i think that being prejudiced doesn't require you to hate all or any other ethnic groups, it just requires an element of 'prejudgement' so you expect something different (or worse?) of another group than you would expect from your own, even when that is based on fact - so more people are perhaps guilty than would consider them selves to be racists

what the hell is the problem with these bloody people banging on about racism. FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST.......stop making a mountain out of a mole hill.


I said that Peckham was grubby and dirty and needed some TLC, as did many other people!


Some people could start an argument in am empty room.

As a new person to this forum I can't believe the debate I have just ploughed through concerning Rye Lane. I live just off Bellenden Road and East Dulwich was where I grew up and went to school (JAGS). Back then in the 80's and early 90's East Dulwich was a "dump". I have now returned to find it cleaned up and full of nouveau riche types from other parts of London. Peckham and Rye lane was a slighter smarter place with lots of shops and a thriving mixed community. Now it has been taken over by the market vendors and cheap shops, it is certainly vibrant and during trading hours noisy and dirty as all markets are; but dangerous?!

As a Londoner born and bred I have lived in just about every corner of this city and one thing never changes. Any town with an ethnic presence is labelled dangerous and undesirable. There are many people in this country and on this forum who have racism inbedded within them and they don't know it. They spout their ignorance in pubs and at dinner parties and get away with it because most people belong to that huge club which is the silent majority, the ones who pretend that nasty things are not being done and said on their doorstep and thus they enable it.

I have seen white people on Rye Lane recoil because a black person has brushed against them and then seen those same people on Lordship Lane pretending not to notice the group of foul yobs outside the EDT vomiting in the gutter.

To the person who started this debate, move to Peckham, if you are worldly wise enough to know a drug deal when you see one or can tell when someone is smoking Heroin, you can clearly take care of yourself and can live anywhere.

As for the rest of you and you know who you are, yes YOU ARE RACIST but you already know that hence the indignant babbling. Grow up and put your time and energy towards helping the hundreds of black kids who attempt suicide every month no doubt because they are fed up with being told who they are and what the area they live in is like (ie a dangerous dump full of dodgy characters). Look in the mirror and realise that in 2008 one of the hottest debates on TV is the fact that a mixed race man ( dubbed Black by Whites across the Western world as are all people who have one white and one black parent - no agenda there I'm sure) is running for President of the USA. "Oooh do you think he'll win" you all ponder over your pints of cider but not one of you has the soul to ask why has it taken so long for this to happen. Maybe its because so many of you still think and talk like those nasty hood wearing types someone saw fit to make a crass joke about. Just because you speak in code and use different words doesn't mean you're not one of them. Every time I see a police car on Lordship Lane its to break up a fight and that is nearly every week. Normal people know and understand that every area has nice parts and rough bits and everywhere has crime. Choose your postcode and someone will be able to show you a corner where yobs of all ages and colours gather to make a nuisance of themselves and break the law. Anyone who says different about any particular place is an ignorant fool with an agenda.

Please ... no sniffy and defensive retorts you only embarrass yourselves just grow up.

  • Administrator

Yellowdee, I appreciate that it is you first post but, as I have previously requested, please refrain from insulting people on this thread. Please feel free to start another thread in the Lounge about what racism means to you.


Thank you.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oi Sydenham has lots of beautiful houses, you just

> need to get off the high street.



Quite right. Bishopsthorpe/Queensthorpe/Dukesthorpe etc and Mayow Road and Cator Road have stunning houses. (Had to step in and defend SE26!)

Can I also point out that if you do decide to live in the area of Peckham that is now called Bellenden, and for whatever reason you want to avoid Rye Lane, it is highly likely that you will be closer to Lordship Lane/East Dulwich Station/Denmark Hill Station/Sainsburys than a lot of people living in East Dulwich!

MadWorld74 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> what the hell is the problem with these bloody

> people banging on about racism. FOR THE LOVE OF

> CHRIST.......stop making a mountain out of a mole

> hill.

>

> I said that Peckham was grubby and dirty and

> needed some TLC, as did many other people!

>

> Some people could start an argument in am empty

> room.



typical example of what i was talking about - a response to a post that didn't try to think about the preceding post, rather jumped to an immediate conclusion - not trying to start an argument or making arrogant statements about 'bloody people' just trying to express an opinion


i wasn't calling you a racist - to you i was pointing out that you don't know how to spell 'hear, hear' (and can't be bothered to check despite the fact that you're sat on the internet)


my comments re racism were about the wider thread, but guess that you're not open to others' opinions

Bloody hell Yellowdee that is quite an introduction to the forum!


I agree with your initial points about Peckham and East Dulwich a few years back, I'm from here too.


As for

"As for the rest of you and you know who you are, yes YOU ARE RACIST but you already know that hence the indignant babbling.",


I don't know if I'm one of those at whom that's directed, as I was involved in the "debate", but that's like saying you can accuse anyone of anything, and if they defend themselves because they're a bit annoyed at an accusation, it's just proof that the initial accusation was true. That makes no sense!


I am also loving


"Please ... no sniffy and defensive retorts you only embarrass yourselves just grow up.".


It kind of reminds me of saying whatever you like to someone you don't know at all then sticking fingers in your ears and going something like "La la la la la la la la la la".


Man this is the first thread I have gotten involved with in the main section of the forum for months. I'm off back to the lounge to talk about football, it's safer there.

As I said before, if it was just a matter of calling Peckham Rye grubby or messy, as I said you could understand that, all markets are the same the world over, but I don't actually currently have the time to trawl through every post and actually quote the various terms and comments I have heard used to describe it, basically "e-coli ridden", "stinking", "smelly" etc. the list goes on, "normal" shops! "I wouldn't shop there" walk there, etc. or its just that people from East Dulwich would have no need to shop there, i.e. they are white and have no need for ethnic shops, foods, clothing, anything??? Come on guyz, you've got to get it, tell me you are not sooooo ignorant as to not see why people would get upset?

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> "Please ... no sniffy and defensive retorts you

> only embarrass yourselves just grow up.".

>

> It kind of reminds me of saying whatever you like

> to someone you don't know at all then sticking

> fingers in your ears and going something like "La

> la la la la la la la la la".


It's exactly like that Keef. The Violet Elizabeth Bott revival starts here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...