Jump to content

The dark side of the forum. (stupid, aggressive "we'll ruin you on the EDF" comments)


Recommended Posts

20 October, 2010, when you twice used asterisked obscenity to attack me as a poster.


***


My case is -- you post CEASELESSLY. You monitor, chide, contradict, and rebuke across all aspects of the forum, and you do so all the time. What breathing space do you leave to other people?


To be tagged as a member of the ten-thousand-club should, I think, cause one to ask herself -- Am I simply loud? Do I offer more opinions than I have thoughts? But you seem to glory in how much noise you have made.


In my eyes, your postings above are characteristic of the lack of insight for which I initially took you to task.


But, that said: A perception of mine, nothing more.

Eh?


I am asking for examples.


You've given one , from nearly three years ago, which you haven't even posted up here - with the context, as presumably I was responding to a post or posts from you - so that people can make up their own minds.


You must have searched for hours to find that one. I hope you think it was time well spent.


It seems to me - judging from your very personal attack on me on this thread - that you, ironically, are a prime example of the kind of low-level bullying that makes some people fearful of posting on this forum.


Unlike you, I am "out" on the forum. Many people know who I am in "real life", as I am half of http://www.thegooseisout.com


If you have an issue with me, you can come and find me easily and have an adult discussion with me face to face, instead of childishly insulting me on here.


Meantime, I will continue to post about whatever I like, as much as I like and however I like - including (recent posts) abour a fox in my garden, thanking people for suggesting London-based activities for my grandchildren's visits, defending the existence of SE22 magazine, and promoting the Goose community and other music events.


Why shouldn't I post on here? I have lived here for over twenty years and clearly have an interest in what goes on in the area.

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was someone who used to post regularly who

> was an intellectual bully, who regarded himself as

> superior to most other posters and who always had

> to have the last word. Happily I haven't read him

> recently on the MB. I hope that his absence is

> permanent.

>

> This may be the same person as the one mentioned

> by other posters.


I agree. H was a bullying poster much of the time, and he was always joined by 2-3 regular posters whenever and wherever he posted. Maybe they supported H for fear of being bullied themselves.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes though I think earlier in the post others were

> referring to U...


that was my thinking too LondonMix!


anyway, on the subject of the venerable H, I had my fair share of run-ins with him. He could be breathtakingly rude at times but I feel the place lacking without his intelligent and humorous contributions (am i really typing this?). Just goes to show if you can see past the sometimes arsey posts, there were helpful contributions too.


A bully though? Never.

Huge Nut never made me laugh I must say.


He did know when he'd gone too far sometimes but then he'd retreat into, 'I'm just one of the chaps joshing' mode, rather than apologising.


But nothing on here is like Urban75, which can get brutal

Bullying and harrassment whether on-line or not is about the perception of the perceiver. Thats what counts. I would suggest 'chasing' someone around the forum on different threads/demanding answers from posters/posting immediately in response to a particular poster all of the time/belittling posts/joining other clique posters in same behaviour to a poster are all examples that may constitute bullying and a posters perception of being bullied.

People who use the forum to complain about local businesses can often find themselves shot-down by other forumites who are happy customers of that business. I suppose if someone has genuine cause for complaint then we want to hear about that, but I think most people on here can rise above the petty posting that occasionally goes on.


I don't think any local business should allow themselves to be bullied by someone who threatens to post a bad review on the forum. Bullies should always be stood up to.


I find false recommendations worrying. People who join the forum just to rave about a particular service and then, surprise surprise, they never post about anything ever again. I would go so far as to say that if someone recommends a business and it's their first ever post on the forum, ignore the recommendation and assume it is false. Cynical, I know, but there we are. By the same rule of thumb, I'd take a complaint about a local business from a first-poster with a pinch of salt.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "being set upon by the forum bullies."

>

> has anyone compiled a list of who the bullies are?


H has already been named but I think the others are


O

S

E

K


.....they have been known to operate as a pack.

Sheemy,


Really?


This being your 2nd post, how do you know anything about the forum?


Me, being a regular & having some idea of who you might be referring to......


I can guarantee that none of them are bullies. Neither was H !

Sheemy. Don't be shy.. What's with the fourth grade coyness?


Sandnot. Probably a cross-post-timing thing but looks like the post was addressed to sheemy not you


It is odd that someone who has "never posted before" would suddenly start posting on a thread, with accusations and allegations against hinted names isn't it?

sandnot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you referring to me?



I'm pretty sure he/she wasn't referring to you.


He/she is misguided anyway, so I wouldn't worry about it!

I am a regular observer of the posts, debates and arguments on this forum.


I have been watching this forum for the nearly a year. I do not post as frequently as you but this is my perception from what I have seen.


I am not sure about H, he is not the first person that came to mind for me but Strafer Jack suggested a list and I am adding to it.


I think bullying should be called out, sometimes people don't realise they are doing it. I don't think there is any harm in this as I think it is not an accusation against anyone.


If you think that the initials above refer to you then you might want to think about your behaviour.



-------------------------------------------------------

> Sheemy,

>

> Really?

>

> This being your 2nd post, how do you know anything

> about the forum?

>

> Me, being a regular & having some idea of who you

> might be referring to......

>

> I can guarantee that none of them are bullies.

> Neither was H !

sheemy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am a regular observer of the posts, debates and

> arguments on this forum.

>

> I have been watching this forum for the nearly a

> year. I do not post as frequently as you but this

> is my perception from what I have seen.

>

> I am not sure about H, he is not the first person

> that came to mind for me but Strafer Jack

> suggested a list and I am adding to it.


with intials? adding what apart from speculation?


>

> I think bullying should be called out,


so have the courage of your convictions and name names.


Huge was often forthright, sometimes patronising/superior, sometimes dismissive and cynical, sometimes humorous but was never a bully and far from having a coterie of acolytes often faced regular posters ranged against him in his various posturings.

I have not named H, but others on the thread have. I cannot think of any bullying I have witnessed from Huge in particular.


Yes speculation is sometimes a good thing. The people I am referring to know who they are and might just think about whether their behaviour can be perceived as bullying by others. I think this will be a good thing all round.

A phrase springs to mind when encountering someone like sheemy


I will give you the first letters of the phrase


S

R

P


Sheemy will know what it means but

if you can work it out then I'm afraid you might want to have a long, hard think about yourself

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I recently had a utility room built, next to the kitchen. Dean Richards and his team carried out the works, they did a fantastic job. Thorough, with attention to every detail.  If you are considering an extension, refurbishment or renovation, Dean comes highly recommended.  Dean Richards  07888 651798  
    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...