Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I may have the name of the pub wrong but... Did they just paint over a significant mural on the side of the pub?

I know people don't consider murals important but this one was painted by a significant artist

 

Mural by Remi/Rough, side wall of The Bishop, Crawthew Grove and Lordship Lane, East Dulwich, London SE22 8EW

 

Edited by Autofill
spelling
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/354452-bishop-pub-mural/
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Insuflo said:

I hadn’t realised it had been painted over. Seems a damn shame. 

It wasn't one of the murals connected with the project reinterpreting  paintings from Dulwich Picture Gallery, so far as I know,  so I guess nobody was protecting it or bothered about it, sadly.

2 hours ago, Kathleen Olander said:

It was awful, in my opinion.

I liked it! 

I'm very glad the one on the side of what is now The Lordship has gone though.

But sad about the one which used to be up by The Plough and was painted over with something else completely.

Edited by Sue
38 minutes ago, SpringTime said:

I hear it's going to replaced by William Bouguereau's 1850 Dante and Virgil in Hell, or Mattia Preti's Martyrdom of St Peter, circa 1660.

Nah, the windows of the men’s bogs are in the wrong place for either of those.

Edited by Insuflo
  • Haha 1
3 hours ago, Autofill said:

Just because something is abstract doesn’t make it dull… 

Also the artist is a respected artist who has created street art all over london and the world. Commissioned by councils as well. The piece deserved to be protected

 

What piece needs to be protected, the one that's been painted over?  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's a few years since I last grappled with a Windows installation, but I don't recall ever having done any apparent harm by using a Windows installation or recovery drive for repair purposes, and it can be effective.  Reinstalling the boot manager software shouldn't be a big or precarious deal for it.  It's already identified the problem and knows how to repair itself.
    • But has it been established that poor sewerage infrastructure can be a cause of flooding;  and then such as to attribute a legal responsibility for it to a water company?
    • They're not. But the work to build bunds which hold significant amounts of water in Dulwich and more recently Peckham Rye parks, was undertaken to mitigate the impacts of poor drainage and sewerage infrastructure (which was under invested in for years) causing flooding to properties. The latter is (as I understand it) the responsibility of the water companies. I believe taxpayers have paid for the underinvestment in infrastructure by the water companies in two ways; firstly, by paying to have the changes made to the parks (I never got a clear answer from Renata on this forum when I asked, but think this is the case); and secondly through the loss of amenity those schemes inevitably create when those parks are waterlogged through the winter months. As I said, privatised profits, socialised costs.
    • Our waste collectors tip the food bins straight into garden waste. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...