Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Neighbours!

With Halloween fast approaching, let's make it easy for families to find those welcoming, spooky doorsteps around East Dulwich. If your street is planning to hand out treats, share the location here! It'll help families plan their routes & make sure no little ghouls & goblins miss out on the fun.

Looking forward to a safe & festive Halloween
🎃


Here's one of our oh-so adorable little lions @ twb. as we're all getting into the Halloween spirit!

E4D906A2-9EC2-492A-BEFD-4698B5B1B0C0.jpg

  • Like 2

Think this year I might encourage the kids to go to the family mausoleum and pick up some goodies and relics, which will ready them for yule, life, birth, and for hell (which isn't an eternally bad place, it's just where you can have a wash before you're born again) and then rebirth. 

Or I might ply them with processed factory trash riddled with sugar after having ordered online their obsolete costumes made by slaves in Asian sweatshops.   X

  • Haha 5
  • Confused 1

Please stick to your own streets.  I don't understand why you need to go further.  We are pretty child friendly round our way.  Pumpkins are often put out to say it is OK to knock.  Why do you think it is OK to other locations.

Edited by malumbu
  • Agree 3

To me, it’s  bizarre to go to streets and ring strangers’ doorbells purely for the reason of getting free sweets.   There needs to be some interchange with the people who are giving you sweets, they are supposed to vaguely recognise you even though you are costumed and say how great you look which hopefully you do.  The trick or treaters should know who you are.  I’ve heard too many older bratty children (age 10 plus+) walking the streets round here and audibly saying how great it is to be given free stuff while not even wearing a costume.   The tiny children are the only ones I’d have any time for now.    I lived in North America for a while as a child and we only went round our local streets and rang the doorbells of people we knew.  When I was too old to trick or treat , it  was fun to hand out the treats while seeing kids you knew, younger brothers and sisters of your school friends,  and who had spent time and effort organising their costumes.  Some of our neighbours with garages organised bobbing for apples and had hot mulled non alcoholic cider and donuts for both children and the grownups.  

Trick or treaters (age immaterial, but costume important!) don't forget Lordship Lane - a number of houses opposite The Lordship Pub are ready to welcome you. Personally I've never had anyone not dressed up and all the children have been polite and charming.  I have no problem with older children - when you're too young to go to pubs or parties and too grown up to go with parents you need to have some fun too and my kids loved it at this age. It's only one night of the year and really exciting when you're young. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2

When did all this start in England? It seems to be quite recently.

When I lived in Scotland there was guising every year,  but I never remember it in England.

I have very mixed feelings about it, as although it's obviously fun for the children whose parents are financially or otherwise able to participate, it also seems like yet another way for big businesses to take the opportunity to make money.

This is an interesting article about the history etc, though North American centric in parts:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trick-or-treating

 

Edited by Sue

I don't understand why you need to be 'financially able to contribute'? I was a single mum without much money but rustling up a witch or cat costume was easy and pumpkins and sweets are cheap (or you can make biscuits). One of the joys of Halloween is that, unlike Christmas, it doesn't need to be expensive. I agree that the marketing around it is not ideal -maybe there's pressure to buy stuff now. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Trick or Treat is fairly benign these days.

When it first became a thing in Manchester in the 80s, it was just another scam to raise funds for a bunch of 'Screamer Repeaters' &  'Airbombs', except it was essentially demanding money with menaces rather than basic begging.

It was far more profitable than 'cob coaling' or dressing your mates' smallest brother in an anorak and mask, sticking them in an old pram and asking for a 'Penny for the Guy'.

Teenagers can't buy fireworks now. It's health and safety gone mad.

18 minutes ago, Dulwichway said:

What a sad bunch of boring negative killjoys that frequent this forum! let the good kids have their fun, it's no wonder only a handful of members bother posting on here. 🙄

A forum is for people to express their opinions! It would be very boring if everybody had the same opinion!

You presumably didn't "frequent this forum" in the old days?

It was toxic compared to how it is now.

Edited by Sue
2 hours ago, satsuma said:

Good Lord, so many of you are absolutely miserable.

Well, that's a cheery post which has really contributed to the discussion  🤣🤣🤣

6 hours ago, claresy said:

I don't understand why you need to be 'financially able to contribute'? I was a single mum without much money but rustling up a witch or cat costume was easy and pumpkins and sweets are cheap (or you can make biscuits). One of the joys of Halloween is that, unlike Christmas, it doesn't need to be expensive. I agree that the marketing around it is not ideal -maybe there's pressure to buy stuff now. 

I did say "financially or otherwise" able to contribute x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • London is lawless. The amount of brazen shoplifting that goes on is appalling.  The police do nothing about it  we just pay the cost in our own shopping bills.   Gun crime is also very problematic after the recent early release of some very bad people. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/gun-crime-london-ladbroke-grove-shootings-chris-kaba-kensington-chelsea-gangs-b1196552.html  
    • Does this list satisfactorily summarise the trips Reeves, Rayner and Starmer have so far succeeded in tripping themselves up with? i) 5.5% pay increase for public sector  ii) £300 Pensioner heating allowance withdrawn  iii) Budget increasing employer NI contributions iv) Two consecutive months of GDP reducing by 0.1% each month v) Farmers Inheritance Tax to be increased  vi) Inflation increasing vii) WASPI women compensation scheme denied  viii)  still to happen viiii)  still to happen x)  still to happen
    • These figures are of course shocking but are restricted to London and the UK. Without the context of like for like statistics for other global cities they do not provide evidence for your assertion that   
    • I think it's possible to view several of the mistakes labour has made as "not good" without it equalling a disaster I know there is a narrative out there that this will play into Reform hands - but  you would have to look at all of the major issues and think Reform would do a better job. No sane person could think that.  And then there is the obvious problem with Farage - people don't like him. Oh I know in some heartlands he has a big enough core - but the country as a whole? Nah I think labour are being clumsy in some areas, wrong in others, deeply dissapointing in some cases - and yet even before they were elected I knew most of this was likely - just because of the  size of the problems facing the country  (and I still reckon most people haven't quite grasped how bad things are after 14 years)  coupled with the fact that labour talent pool is  mid-table at best, compared with New Labour years.  All still HUGELY more desirable than what we have had previously tho    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...