Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

My partner & I are looking to potentially buy a place near the intersection of Lordship Lane and Barry Road.
 

We’ve read reports that the Lordship Lane area suffers from higher than average levels of historical building subsidence, and we’re worried - based solely on appearances - that this might be the case for the house we’re looking to buy (a Victorian terraced). 

 

Have any of you based in a similar location (Lordship Lane-Barry Road intersection/broad area) had problems with building subsidence, or heard/noticed that it is a common problem in the area?

 

Any input, guidance, or experience very welcome & appreciated.

 

Many thanks in advance!

Kieran 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/352816-widespread-building-subsidence/
Share on other sites

There have been incidences of real subsidence, of course, in East Dulwich, and building on a clay substrate clearly has issues, but I bought my house nearly 40 years ago with a 'crack' in one wall, which has subsequently pretty well closed  and disappeared. Insurance companies (a) hate to pay out and (b) like to charge as much as they can; so supporting a 'history' of local subsidence is absolutely in their best interests.

Of course get a proper, independent, survey done and take engineering advice. There are lots of good reasons for the appearance of cracks (the presence or recent absence of biggish trees for one),  which are not indicators of significant topological movement which puts the structure in jeopardy. And with the absence of industry (particularly brewing) local water tables in the Thames basin have risen. 

But there is little evidence, which I have seen, for large scale engineering works locally to address subsidence issues (there was one a 100-200 yards or so away from me on a hill about 20 years ago).

So don't worry unnecessarily.

Oh, and some builders are still seeing signs of house movement as a consequence of war-time bomb damage following V weapon strikes. Which does need repair but which isn't, in any strict sense, subsidence.

  • Like 3

Our neighbour in Barry Road had subsidence about 15-20 years ago and the insurance company thought it was caused by the roots of a large tree in street. At that time there were similar occurrences else where in the borough, and Southwark Council were forced by various insurance companies to increase their tree maintenance including felling of unsafe trees.  

It maybe worthwhile checking the foundations of the house because some houses in Dulwich were designed and built in such a manner as to eliminate/reduce the risk of subsidence.

One such design feature was "raft foundations"These are thick, reinforced concrete slabs that spread the building’s load evenly across a large surface area, reducing the differential movement caused by subsidence. Raft foundations "float" on the clay and accommodate movements without major structural damage.

Another factor worth considering is if the terrace of houses is on level ground or on a slope . On a downhill slope, the houses lower down the slope are potentially more prone to subsidence damage  because the houses higher up the slope tend to "lean" on those further down if subsidence movement has occurred.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Some new reviews up since I last posted here. Link below. Just to clarify I'm not a grifter, this is not a con or a scam to defraud the good people of SE22, I'm not flogging anything and even if I was I'm not exactly twisting your arm. If you don't approve don't click. You can donate if you want but you don't have to. Not many donate, though it would be nice of course if more did. I've been a professional writer for over thirty years and I now find I have more time on my hands so have decided to write primarily about things that interest me. If people object they are going to object. One thing I have learnt over those years is you can't please everybody! https://eatsdulwich.substack.com/ 
    • Seems sensible. Good to see the school street going in too. That part of town could do with some public realm improvement.
    • One question that needs to be understood about both sections that proposals for changes for buses, is "are there currently problems that cause major delays alreay?"  Granted buses can be slow going north towards Rye Lane however often it is caused by either other buses at the Nigel Riad bus stop or the junction with Heaton Road which causes tail backs.  The north side of Peckham Rye (proposed bus gate beyween Scylla Road and Nunhead Lane ) never strikes me as a busy section but I don't traverse it often. However it does look like they are rerouting the 342, p12 and 78 northbound along it, removing their stop at the corner of East Dulwich Riad and Peckham Rye (a good spot for changing from a 37, 12, 197, 63 and 363 to the other buses, now forcing the change at the Nigel Road stop)  I guess the current flow patterns need to be understood o make sense of this prooposal and questions raised over passenger preferences on buses as well. 
    • Wondering about impact of Gala on all this too?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...