Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A real shame, wish there was some form of rent control on highstreets, otherwise all that will happen is local traders will get priced out of the market and it will become a generic street or worse still an empty shop...


I'm not stupid enough to ingore the market dynamics of simple supply vs.demand but really wish it wasn't like this.

Good they are staying local even if its not on the main high street anymore. However, its a shame that valuable services like a locksmith can't afford high street rents. The high street will end up just shops and restaurants which I love but you also need DIY stores, a locksmith, shoe repairs, dry cleaners etc. They may not be as exciting as a new restaurant but certainly more necessary.

Good shop with helpful staff. Well at least they will still be in ED.


The 'Pessimistic' ?? Fox has been predicting the demise of Lordship Lane for some time now.


Well the likes of those Favouring the ?12.00 burger and ?12.00 bottle of Craft beer only have themselves to blame.


The Snob Element has helped to establish a situation where only those places charging such prices can afford

the rent and rates.


Well now the Greedy Landlords or raising the bar. Even those places can no longer compete.


The Bubble has Burst.


So more generic stores , estate agents.. or indeed Closed down Shops.


Not the first time in the History of Lordship Lane / North Cross Road.


DulwichFox

I always think why isn't the Threshers being rented, better to get ?20k than ask for ?40k and have it empty for years.


It's been said before on the forum before that the lease has some odd provisions that it has to be used as an off-licence and the landlord won't change it.

Opposite the locksmiths, the old photographic/print shop next to Kaival's newsagent is still empty (despite signs saying it has been let) and soup dragon (as was) is host to yet another pop-up shop full of tat so shop premises on this part of LL hardly at a premium - unless greedy bastard landlords are holding out for the Poundland money?*


*The locksmith premises letting includes garages at the rear so Poundland could be on the way.

DulwichFox's comment about minimal rates isn't correct. Businesses get 3 months exemption and are then liable for 100% of the rates, unless the rateable value is below ?2,600, which I doubt any commercial property in SE22 is. Residential property used to get a six month exemption from council tax with an extension if it required refurbishment. Since April 2013 this is at the discretion of the LA and all London boroughs now demand 100% from the first day the property is empty. Some LA are increasing the council tax to 150% after 2 years.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good shop with helpful staff. Well at least they

> will still be in ED.

>

> The 'Pessimistic' ?? Fox has been predicting the

> demise of Lordship Lane for some time now.

>

> Well the likes of those Favouring the ?12.00

> burger and ?12.00 bottle of Craft beer only have

> themselves to blame.

>

> The Snob Element has helped to establish a

> situation where only those places charging such

> prices can afford

> the rent and rates.

>

> Well now the Greedy Landlords or raising the bar.

> Even those places can no longer compete.

>

> The Bubble has Burst.

>

> So more generic stores , estate agents.. or

> indeed Closed down Shops.

>

> Not the first time in the History of Lordship

> Lane / North Cross Road.

>

> DulwichFox


I really doubt that it will be another estate agent. Surely they are all represented on LL already and in any event they will work out soon that, since the emergence of the internet and the likes of Zoopla/Rightmove, they are wasting their (or indeed our) money with high street offices - the tide is already turning in ED with companies like No Flies and Fish Need Water (although I note the latter have succumbed to an office recently).

The Iceland debacle - which will create (possibly) another blighted retail spot in the Lane - will exacerbate the situation - Callows (I am presuming) can't afford the rent-rise because it's not getting the footfall and custom to generate sufficient revenues (it's locksmithing business, installing locks etc., isn't so location dependent). As retail 'holes' appear in the street so will footfall fall away (the bars and restaurants are a different type of trade) - making high rents for retail stores increasingly non-viable.


It is a moot point whether a small M&S would have been sufficient to stimulate greater retail footfall and have a positive knock-on to other retailers - but the apparent future of that site is clearly not going to be retail beneficial to LL.


Regular small independent retailers have to make their money (often) out of single sites - where they can't they will move or fold.

dumpertruck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> host to yet another pop-up shop full of tat

>

> actually host to a place flogging some rather nice

> furniture


If your idea of nice is ?60 for a single 1970s dining room chair and a collection of 'retro' crap from the city's charity shops with a hefty mark-up then yes, 'nice'.

It is a real shame that Callows are leaving LL, but as already mentioned, good that they're not leaving the area. There does seem to be a pattern at the moment of commercial landlords seeking big rent increases,forcing out established businesses, and then finding that big paying tenants are not (immediately) to be found. The market is clearly due for a 'correction' but I would favour a business rate regime that has a strong disincentive to leaving properties vacant.


BTW, I can't believe that anyone is still trotting out this old nonsense:


"The Snob Element has helped to establish a situation where only those places charging such prices can afford

the rent and rates."


People have money, they spend it on what they want. Some have more, some have less. Are you suggesting that if there were more people in ED with less cash it would be healthier for shops?

The trouble with ED is this. Estate agents have spent years telling us about how the place has 'arrived' and house prices continue to rise etc. This misleading hype then leads landlords of shops to presume that a rate hike will attract bigger, wealthier chains to the area. Aside from the fact LL lacks enough retail space suitable for any such high rent payers and the lack of footfall in what is still a relatively inaccessible area of zone 2, the fact remains that ED is NOT Notting Hill, it is not Richmond, it is not Islington - the collapse in house prices in 2008 and lack of high end spenders in the area indicates to most sensible people this area is often seen as a fairly comfortable area that is quite fragile to any big economic downturns - unlike some safe areas of gentrified London. ED is not the big investors safe haven the estate agents may like you to think it is, and probably never will be!


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A lovely bit of writing, which perfectly captures that strange world. I know few men undamaged by public boarding school. 
    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...