Jump to content

Charter North Dulwich - material Safeguarding issues at the school? CND hiding key Safeguarding information? parents' experience?


Recommended Posts

Hello

I'm keen to understand the differing view of parents of pupils at Charter North Dulwich with regards to the school's approach to dealing with bullying, misogyny, threatening, violent and abusive behaviour including physical assault and Safeguarding in general.

And whether parents believe that Charter North Dulwich meets its Duty of Care obligation to its pupils at all times?

In July 2023 it was communicated to parents that there was a very material failure of Charter North Dulwich's Safeguarding rules and procedures .

The Designated Safeguarding Lead was immediately removed from this role.

There is a reference in the September 2023 Minutes of the Board of Governors that there will be a full discussion of Safeguarding at the next meeting which was held on 23 November 2023.

No Minutes of the Board of Governors Meeting on 23 November 2023 are publicly available on the website of Charter North Dulwich but Minutes of subsequent meetings are available.

Charter North Dulwich has had 5 different Designated Safeguarding Leads in the last 3 years.

Do parents believe that Charter North Dulwich has actually improved its Safeguarding rules and procedures in practice or do parents believe that Charter North Dulwich has an institutional problem with its Safeguarding?

Are parents worried about their child's safety and security at Charter North Dulwich in the light of the material failure of its Safeguarding policy and procedures in July 2023?

What is their experience and the experience of their child since that time?

Do parents believe that Charter North Dulwich and its Board of Governors are deliberately hiding the information with regards to its material Safeguarding issue by not publishing the Minutes of the Board of Governors Meeting on 23 November 2023?

Thoughts and experiences welcome.

  • Like 1

If there was a safeguarding failure of the magnitude you’re describing then it should have been referred to Ofsted. There may well be an investigation and/or subsequent inspection triggered by this.  Schools are required to publicise no-notice inspections on their websites so you may not have long to wait to find out if this is the case.

Thank you for your reply

There is no obligation on Charter North Dulwich to report this material Safeguarding incident in July 2023 to Ofsted

The obligation on any person or body regulated by Ofsted to self report relates to something called a “Significant Event”

 

However there is no definition of a “Significant Event” 

 

The regulated party, in this case, Charter North Dulwich, has complete discretion in how they define if a matter constitutes a “Significant Event” and therefore whether or not to report such a matter to Ofsted

 

The letter to the parents in July 2023 from Charter North Dulwich reporting the material Safeguarding issue is very clear as to the steps the school is taking to address the matter.

 Equally, the letter very clearly makes no reference to the school reporting this material Safeguarding incident to Ofsted.

 

There is no other evidence in the public domain that Charter North Dulwich reported this material Safeguarding incident to Ofsted.

 

What ICO says at https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/foi/freedom-of-information-and-environmental-information-regulations/public-authorities-under-foia/ may be relevant:

Schedule 1 may not list an organisation in the way you expect. For example, within the education sector, the school itself is not the public authority. That falls to the governing body of a school, further education institution or university.

The police will not investigate a Safeguarding issue at a school as it is not a criminal matter per se and do not have the available resource 

The local authority does not have any oversight or regulatory authority for an Academy school

A complaint to Ofsted will initially be answered within 30 working days or 42 calendar days

A complaint may be made directly to the school or to a parent Trust of such a school; however, they determine how it will be processed and by whom

Separately, under the UK Government Guidance dated September 2024 

"Keeping Children Safe In Education 2024: Statutory Guidance for Schools & Colleges"

It is stated in Part One: Information for all School & College Staff

"Part 1, 2: In order to fulfil this responsibility effectively, all practitioners should make sure their approach is child centred.  This means they they should consider, at all times, what is in the best interests of the child"

 

Other than the two routes outlined above, there appears to be no alternative way to ensure that a school abides by their Duty of Care at all times and in a way whereby such breach can be immediately or quickly cured and in a manner which is in the best interests of the child at all times unless someone is able to refer to an alternative route?

 

  • 1 month later...

Good Evening, 

Thank you for this post.

Yes, I agree TCND are not Safeguarding the children properly and I am concerned that members of staff do not take report’s seriously. I too have concerns and was going to address the Governors, however, reading what you have written makes me think that they are all init together. I just can’t wait for my children to finish at this school. 
 

So to answer your question, no they have not improved their Safeguarding and yes I believe that it is an institutional issue. I hope that helps.

  • 3 weeks later...

Nice bit of defamation of character 

Just checked and you said similar about the Head 

Have you complained or would you prefer to be anonymous and go through social media?

Edited by malumbu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I remember halfpennies. Farthings had gone by my time. 2/6 (half a crown) that looked very similar to 2s.  
    • Looks like moths have been at it!
    • "They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. " This simply isn't true. Global issues all play their own parts (as they do with other countries) but the UK govt had  been especially abject for years. Improvements could not be made with them in power. That's not to say everything is all roses when they go To claim parties shouldn't try and sell themselves in an election is absurd - but if labour did overpromise or dig into specifics (which they partly couldn't because they didn't have their hands on the books) then we live in a country where a population and media is happy to punch on them and relect the shabby last govt I mean if any argument I made was supported by some posters I would rethink it but thats just me
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...