Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bottom line is, a man of fairness would have

> realised why his actions might have led others to

> misinterpret and would have had the grace to

> apologise and see where events went from there


Perhaps, but equally a man who has decided incorrectly that he has been accused of something would be big enough to realise that and move on, no?

I think he did move on


but pointing out that today you are posting overly-aggressive posts on multiple threads on a lovely spring day is unrelated to the previous incident


But again, instead of taking a breath and going "am I?" you barely pause before saying "am I fook!" and plough on regardless


just chill a bit is all people are saying

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think he did move on

>

> but pointing out that today you are posting

> overly-aggressive posts on multiple threads on a

> lovely spring day is unrelated to the previous

> incident

>

> But again, instead of taking a breath and going

> "am I?" you barely pause before saying "am I

> fook!" and plough on regardless

>

> just chill a bit is all people are saying



By calling me names he's moved on? Ok right. Clearly I'm the one who needs to chill

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> given you have been banned MULTIPLE times from the

> forum in the past, the name calling may not be

> grown-up but it has basis in truth

>

> Why don't you try and show him to be wrong instead

> of acting like a 12 year old


If you must know I sent him a polite PM asking to lay off the name calling nad he said that I hadn't apologised, again I've not accused the man of anything, and that I had spoilt his enjoyment of the forum and "to do one". Don't say I didn'y at least try.

over the years I have had my share of run ins with our quids - and one thing I've learned is that if he believes he is being accused of racism it aggravates him mightily


I remember one thread where he deemed something I wrote to be accusatory along those lines - and when I reread it I saw why. And publicy apologised to him on the forum. Job done. Line drawn


leaving you and he aside - as a general rule, if it kicks off publicly on a thread between people, then I think amends have to be public as well. Otherwise yer average reader is going to have a different impression of what went down

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If you've got a problem message me privately.

> You've accused me of calling you a racisr, which

> was bollocks, and then had the nerve to call me a

> K*nt.


Surely PD best just to apologise for what was perhaps a misunderstanding and move on?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > If you've got a problem message me privately.

> > You've accused me of calling you a racisr,

> which

> > was bollocks, and then had the nerve to call me

> a

> > K*nt.

>

> Surely PD best just to apologise for what was

> perhaps a misunderstanding and move on?


In order to set matters, hopefully, right I apologise to ???? for the incident. I certainly wasn't referring to him as a racist, nor was I trying to offend him. Not sure what else I can say.

I missed last nights match, but all the comments I was reading on the beeb basically said Arsenal had 10 men fighting bravely, and they had Ozil.


He has undoubted quality, and I know you didn't buy him to stick his boot in, but you must be a bit concerned about his apparent lack of interest or fight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And the Sainsbury’s own brand chocolate mini rolls have gone from £1.15 to £1.40 overnight, so 22%-ish. I prefer them them to the Cadbury original because they have a lot more chocolate on them, presumably because they’re made in a less advanced factory. I would think that getting the Rizla thin coating of chocolate that Cadbury’s accountants demand onto a piece of sponge is quite a sophisticated operation. Discuss.
    • Another recommendation for Leon. He was able to come out to our electrical elergency within 24 hours of me contacting him. His communication was great and whilst he could not solve our problem, he was able to perform tests to identify this and did so quickly and efficiently. He charging  is very fair and his manner very pleasant. Both of these in contrast to some experiences I have had elsewhere.    happy to put my name to recommending Leon. His number is  07707 925039.
    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...